Search

A collaborative study was conducted to investigate discrepancies in recoveries of two commonly prescribed compounds, amitriptyline and cyclobenzaprine, in patient urine samples when hydrolyzed with different enzymes from different sources. A 2- to 10-fold increase in analyte recoveries was seen for patient samples hydrolyzed using a recombinant β-glucuronidase (IMCSzyme™) over samples hydrolyzed with β-glucuronidase from Haliotis rufescens We report outcomes from four commercially available β-glucuronidase enzymes (IMCSzyme™, Patella vulgata, Helix pomatia and H. rufescens) on patient samples that tested positive for amitriptyline and cyclobenzaprine. Our results confirm reduced hydrolysis of glucuronides by β-glucuronidases isolated from mollusks, but near complete conversion when using the recombinant enzyme. Our premise is that systematic differences in hydrolysis efficiencies due to varying substrate affinity among enzyme subtypes potentially impacts accuracy and reliability of measurements.

A common treatment for chronic pain is prescription of analgesics, but their long-term use entails risk of morbidity, addiction and misuse. One way to reduce the risk of abuse is prescribing of analgesics in a topical form. Physicians are urged to perform urine drug testing to ensure that patients are compliant with their medication regimens. However, there is little data on the efficiency of transdermal delivery for many analgesic drugs, and no data on expected urine drug levels. This study includes data from over 29,000 specimens tested for gabapentin, ketamine, cyclobenzaprine or amitriptyline used orally or topically. Gabapentin and amitriptyline concentrations were more likely to be below the limits of detection (25-40 ng/mL) in the urine of patients using them topically as compared with patients using them orally. Levels in gabapentin-positive topical specimens were much lower than in gabapentin-positive oral specimens (261 ng/mL vs >10,000 ng/mL). In contrast, ketamine and cyclobenzaprine were more readily detectable in the urine of topical users. Ketamine topical specimens were positive 12% more often than oral specimens, and mean topical specimen levels were 68-100% those of oral specimens. Cyclobenzaprine specimens were equally likely to be positive whether the dose was oral or topical, although mean levels after topical dosing were approximately 13-21% those after oral dosing. These findings are consistent with the reported percutaneous absorption efficiencies of gabapentin and ketamine, and are likely to be related to the absorption efficiencies of cyclobenzaprine and amitriptyline.

Patients taking tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) can experience toxicity or severe side effects. As a rapid and less technically demanding alternative to quantitative serum analysis, most laboratories offer qualitative immunoassays to assist in the evaluation of a suspected TCA overdose. However, the relationship between quantitative serum and qualitative urine levels of TCA-related compounds and their metabolites has not been comprehensively studied. Serum high-performance liquid chromatography results were compared to the qualitative urine results using the Syva Rapid Test and the Biosite Triage. Serum concentrations of amitriptyline, desipramine, doxepin, imipramine, and nortriptyline ranging from subtherapeutic to toxic triggered a positive response on both urine immunoassay devices. On the other hand, neither immunoassay uniformly detected clomipramine, even at serum levels greater than the therapeutic range. False positives due to cyclobenzaprine were more common with the Biosite assay. For virtually all positive urine TCA findings, it was not possible to determine whether the positive results corresponded to subtherapeutic, therapeutic, supratherapeutic, or toxic serum concentrations. Because urine immunoassays are the only option for many laboratories analyzing specimens for TCAs (especially in an emergency setting), clinicians must understand the limitations and interpret results in conjunction with clinical findings and/or quantitation of serum levels.

Cyclobenzaprine and its major metabolite, norcyclobenzaprine, differ from amitriptyline and nortriptyline only by the presence of a double bond in the cycloheptane ring. Three patients developed sufficient levels of cyclobenzaprine and norcyclobenzaprine because of either rapid or long-term ingestion of cyclobenzaprine to cause positive interferences in both a Syva EMIT assay and a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assay for identification and quantitation of tricyclic antidepressants in serum. Cyclobenzaprine coeluted with amitriptyline, and norcyclobenzaprine eluted slightly earlier than, but was poorly resolved from, nortriptyline in this HPLC assay. We found that cyclobenzaprine could be distinguished from amitriptyline and that norcyclobenzaprine could be distinguished from nortriptyline on the basis of gas chromatographic retention times upon gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analyses after derivatization with trifluoroacetic anhydride. The compounds were also distinguishable by mass spectrometric criteria.