Search

Background: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) has been described as a neurodegenerative language disorder mainly affecting the left hemisphere. Few cases of right hemisphere damage in right-handed PPA subjects have been reported. This condition, named crossed aphasia in dextral (CAD), is relatively rare and probably related to an alteration during neurodevelopment of language networks., Objective: To explore the prevalence of CAD in an Italian cohort of 68 PPA patients, in order to evaluate whether right hemisphere language lateralization could be a risk factor for PPA., Methods: Clinical-demographic and cerebral [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) scan were analyzed, resulting in 23 logopenic variant (lvPPA) patients, 26 non-fluent variant (nfvPPA) patients, and 19 semantic variant (svPPA) patients. SPM single subject routine was performed for diagnostic purposes in order to identify the hypometabolic pattern of each patient. Based on brain metabolic profile, PPA patients were divided in right and left lvPPA, nfvPPA, and svPPA. [18F]FDG-PET group analyses were performed with SPM two-sample t-test routine., Results: 26% of lvPPA cases were identified as CAD based on right hypometabolic pattern. CAD patients did not differ from left lvPPA regarding demographic features and general cognitive performance; however, they performed better in specific working memory tasks and showed brain hypometabolism limited to the superior, middle, and supramarginal temporal gyri., Conclusion: Atypical lateralization of language function could determine a vulnerability of the phonological language loop and in that way could be a risk factor for lvPPA.

Background: Three variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) have been currently characterized: non fluent/agrammatic (nfv-PPA), semantic (sv-PPA), and logopenic variant (lv-PPA). lv-PPA is most commonly associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD), while nfv-PPA and sv-PPA are related to frontotemporal lobar degeneration., Objective: We aimed to determine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β42 (Aβ42), total tau protein (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau (p-tau), frequently abnormal in AD, could constitute a useful tool in the PPA diagnostic work up, in order to identify subjects with an underlying AD pathology., Methods: We measured CSF biomarker levels in a group of twenty-eight patients, fourteen lv-PPA, nine nfv-PPA, and five sv-PPA., Results: Since there were no significant differences in any of the parameters investigated between nfv-PPA and sv-PPA, the two groups were considered as one (nfv/sv-PPA). At diagnosis, lv-PPA were older than nfv/sv-PPA patients (mean values: 70.7 versus 64.6 years, p = 0.02). CSF biomarker mean concentrations were significantly different in lv-PPA versus nfv/sv-PPA patients (p = 0.000): Aβ42 350.64 versus 661.64 ng/L; tau 631.21 versus 232.71 ng/L; p-tau 101 versus 38.21 ng/L. According to the recent AD diagnostic criteria, (Cummings et al., 2013) eleven lv-PPA and only one nfv/sv-PPA showed a liquoral pattern typical for AD. Finally lv-PPA had CSF biomarker levels very similar to a sample of 72 AD patients from our Department., Conclusions: Our data showed that CSF biomarkers can easily and reliably detect those patients with language disorders due to an underlying AD pathology, thus offering the possibility of targeted therapeutic interventions. However, because of the small sample size, such analyses should be reproduced in larger populations of patients to confirm our data.

We aimed to explore the nature of verbal repetition deficits and infer the cognitive systems involved in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). A total of 63 patients (13 semantic variant (sv-PPA), 17 nonfluent/agrammatic variant (nfv-PPA), 10 logopenic variant (lv-PPA), 23 AD) and 13 matched healthy controls completed a battery of tests that included naming, word comprehension, digit span, repetition of multisyllabic single words, monosyllabic word span presented under similar and dissimilar phonological conditions, and sentence repetition. All patient groups displayed some level of impairment, however, specific patterns emerged in each variant. Participants with sv-PPA were the least impaired, showing marginal difficulties exclusively for sentence repetition, whereas those with lv-PPA had the worst overall performance. Cases with nfv-PPA showed compromised repetition of multisyllabic and phonologically similar words. The deficit in cases with AD was confined to span tasks. These distinctive patterns of language impairments can assist in the differential diagnosis of PPA variants and point toward the vulnerability of specific cognitive systems in each syndrome.