1. Challenges in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnostic Work-Up: Amyloid Biomarker Incongruences
- Author
-
Valentina Berti, Silvia Bagnoli, Camilla Ferrari, Alberto Pupi, Sonia Padiglioni, Irene Piaceri, Valentina Bessi, Sandro Sorbi, Cristina Polito, Benedetta Nacmias, Maria Teresa De Cristofaro, Giulia Lucidi, and Gemma Lombardi
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Amyloid ,Concordance ,Pilot Projects ,tau Proteins ,Disease ,Neuropsychological Tests ,Gastroenterology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cerebrospinal fluid ,Alzheimer Disease ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Dementia ,Humans ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Amyloid beta-Peptides ,business.industry ,General Neuroscience ,Neuropsychology ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Work-up ,Peptide Fragments ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Clinical Psychology ,030104 developmental biology ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,Biomarker (medicine) ,Female ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Biomarkers - Abstract
Background: Discordance among amyloid biomarkers is a challenge to overcome in order to increase diagnostic accuracy in dementia. Objectives: 1) To verify that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (AβR) better agrees with Amyloid PET (Amy-PET) results compared to CSF Aβ42; 2) to detect differences among concordant positive, concordant negative, and discordant cases, basing the concordance definition on the agreement between CSF AβR and Amy-PET results; 3) to define the suspected underlying pathology of discordant cases using in vivo biomarkers. Method: We retrospectively enrolled 39 cognitively impaired participants in which neuropsychological tests, apolipoprotein E genotype determination, TC/MRI, FDG-PET, Amy-PET, and CSF analysis had been performed. In all cases, CSF analysis was repeated using the automated Lumipulse method. In discordant cases, FDG-PET scans were evaluated visually and using automated classifiers. Results: CSF AβR better agreed with Amy-PET compared to CSF Aβ42 (Cohen’s K 0.431 versus 0.05). Comparisons among groups did not show any difference in clinical characteristics except for age at symptoms onset that was higher in the 6 discordant cases with abnormal CSF AβR values and negative Amy-PET (CSF AβR+/AmyPET–). FDG-PET and all CSF markers (Aβ42, AβR, p-Tau, t-Tau) were suggestive of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in 5 of these 6 cases. Conclusion: 1) CSF AβR is the CSF amyloid marker that shows the better level of agreement with Amy-PET results; 2) The use of FDG-PET and CSF-Tau markers in CSFAβR+/Amy-PET–discordant cases can support AD diagnosis; 3) Disagreement between positive CSF AβR and negative Amy-PET in symptomatic aged AD patients could be due to the variability in plaques conformation and a negative Amy-PET scan cannot be always sufficient to rule out AD.
- Published
- 2020