Search

Background: Discordance among amyloid biomarkers is a challenge to overcome in order to increase diagnostic accuracy in dementia. Objectives: 1) To verify that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (AβR) better agrees with Amyloid PET (Amy-PET) results compared to CSF Aβ42; 2) to detect differences among concordant positive, concordant negative, and discordant cases, basing the concordance definition on the agreement between CSF AβR and Amy-PET results; 3) to define the suspected underlying pathology of discordant cases using in vivo biomarkers. Method: We retrospectively enrolled 39 cognitively impaired participants in which neuropsychological tests, apolipoprotein E genotype determination, TC/MRI, FDG-PET, Amy-PET, and CSF analysis had been performed. In all cases, CSF analysis was repeated using the automated Lumipulse method. In discordant cases, FDG-PET scans were evaluated visually and using automated classifiers. Results: CSF AβR better agreed with Amy-PET compared to CSF Aβ42 (Cohen’s K 0.431 versus 0.05). Comparisons among groups did not show any difference in clinical characteristics except for age at symptoms onset that was higher in the 6 discordant cases with abnormal CSF AβR values and negative Amy-PET (CSF AβR+/AmyPET–). FDG-PET and all CSF markers (Aβ42, AβR, p-Tau, t-Tau) were suggestive of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in 5 of these 6 cases. Conclusion: 1) CSF AβR is the CSF amyloid marker that shows the better level of agreement with Amy-PET results; 2) The use of FDG-PET and CSF-Tau markers in CSFAβR+/Amy-PET–discordant cases can support AD diagnosis; 3) Disagreement between positive CSF AβR and negative Amy-PET in symptomatic aged AD patients could be due to the variability in plaques conformation and a negative Amy-PET scan cannot be always sufficient to rule out AD.

Background During the twentieth century, frontotemporal dementia (FTD) was often misdiagnosed, confused with Alzheimer's disease or psychiatric disorders, jeopardizing care and research. Objective To analyze the FTD genes in the DNA samples of patients belonging to families clinically classified as probable Alzheimer's disease (FAD) in the early 1990s and not carrying mutation in the three main genes linked to FAD (Presenilin 1, Presenilin 2, and Amyloid precursor protein). Methods The genetic screening was performed on 63 probands diagnosed as FAD before the early 2000s. Results Four patients out of the 63 studied (4/63, 6.3%) resulted as carrying four different GRN genetic variations: p.T272SfsX10, p.R110X, p.C149LfsX10, and p.W304C. The first two mutations (p.T272SfsX10, p.R110X) are the most frequent ones in Italy in FTD patients; the latter two (p.C149LfsX10 and p.W304C) are not described in the scientific literature. Conclusion Our data suggest that it can be important to re-examine FAD patients diagnosed when the FTD spectrum was not well recognized and the causative FTD genes had not yet been identified. Moreover, we propose initially analyzing genes associated with the first form of suspected dementia and, if the results are negative, studying genes implicated in the other form of dementia.

A new risk gene associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has recently been identified: the Tank-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) gene. Up to now, 90 TBK1 variants have been described in ALS patients with or without frontotemporal dementia (FTD), thus making TBK1 the third or fourth most frequent genetic cause of ALS and FTD. A point mutation analysis in a cohort of 69 Italian ALS patients was performed in order to analyze the frequency of TBK1 mutations and the correlation with clinical phenotypes. The analysis identified the novel variant p.Tyr424Asp in a patient with a rapid progression of the disease. Our data supports the implication of TBK1 in ALS pathogenesis in Italy.

According to the literature, the APP Ala713Thr mutation is associated with Alzheimer's disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. We describe a case of dementia clinically compatible with frontotemporal dementia in an APP Ala713Thr mutation carrier in which both [18F]Florbetapir PET uptake and Aβ1-42 cerebrospinal fluid levels were normal. Further evidences are required to establish if this association is only incidental.