Search

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD) presents a significant challenge in clinical management owing to recalcitrant disease with accompanying profound impacts on patient quality of life. Although asthma represents a significant component of this disease, quality of life disruptions are driven primarily by recalcitrant sinonasal problems, olfactory dysfunction, and the associated psychosocial and dietary implications. This review delves into specific quality of life metrics used to assess NSAID-ERD and the associated health care burden and financial implications of this disease, offering insights into the comparative challenges in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps when available. The article reviews the associated costs and cost-effectiveness of NSAID-ERD-directed therapies, including endoscopic sinus surgery, aspirin desensitization, and biologic therapy. Although some of these emerging treatment approaches show promise, they also present numerous unanswered questions, reflecting the dynamic nature of this field. As the landscape of NSAID-ERD management continues to evolve, this review provides insights into the challenges faced by clinicians and underscores the need for further research to optimize patient care and quality of life outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There has been a paradigm shift in the management of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). It started in 2015 when the first biologic was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for severe eosinophilic asthma. Thus, there emerged a new era in the treatment of patients with type 2-mediated airway diseases. This has led to an increasing number of options for patients, undoubtably a great thing, but has left clinicians without a clear answer for how to balance the therapies that exist for AERD, what to recommend for treatment, and how to best assess the benefits and risks of each therapy. This paper aims to explore these benefits and risks, and to provide a roadmap for future studies., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) has a triad of symptoms: nasal polyposis, asthma, and NSAID hypersensitivity. Little is known about symptom timing and disease progression., Objective: The aim of this study is to characterize disease progression in N-ERD., Methods: Patients with N-ERD were prospectively interviewed and classified into 4 groups based on their first symptom at initial N-ERD onset (asthma, nasal polyps, NSAID hypersensitivity, or all concurrently). Associations of patient characteristics with the 4 groups were examined, along with associations within the "asthma first" group., Results: Patients (N = 240) were mostly female (68%) and self-identified as non-White (77%). Half (N = 119) reported asthma as the earliest symptom in the N-ERD triad. Compared with other groups, "asthma first" was associated with younger age of onset (25 years, standard error ±1.3, P < .001) and higher body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.7, P = .02). In this group, age of onset <20 years was associated with female sex, Latino ethnicity, and higher BMI (all P < .05). The "NSAID sensitivity first" group was significantly associated with male sex (OR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.5-7.4, P = .004) and pollution exposure (OR = 4.4, 95% CI: 1.6-11.9, P = .003). At the initial presentation, 27% of patients were unaware of their N-ERD diagnosis. Black and Latino patients were more likely to be unaware of their N-ERD diagnosis compared with White (P = .003). The median diagnostic delay was 3 years (interquartile range: 0-5 years)., Conclusions: In this cohort, N-ERD is highly variable in onset and progression, with sex, BMI, race and ethnicity, and environmental exposures significantly associated with disease patterns and diagnostic delay., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Systemic corticosteroids (SCSs) are associated with short- and long-term adverse effects., Objective: To assess mepolizumab efficacy according to prior SCS use and characterize mepolizumab's SCS-sparing capabilities, in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps., Methods: In the randomized, double-blind, phase III SYNAPSE trial (NCT03085797), adults with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps eligible for repeat sinus surgery despite standard of care treatment received mepolizumab (100 mg subcutaneously) or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The impact of prior SCS courses (0/1/>1) on mepolizumab versus placebo treatment responses (changes from baseline in total endoscopic nasal polyp [week 52], nasal obstruction visual analog scale [weeks 49-52], and 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test total [week 52] scores) was analyzed post hoc. To characterize mepolizumab's SCS-sparing capabilities, time-to-first SCS course for nasal polyps (prespecified) and total prednisolone-equivalent oral corticosteroid dose by patient baseline characteristics (post hoc, in patients with ≥1 SCS course during SYNAPSE) were assessed up to week 52., Results: Mepolizumab versus placebo improved treatment responses, irrespective of prior SCS use. By week 52, the probability of requiring SCSs for nasal polyps (Kaplan-Meier estimate [95% CI]) was lower with mepolizumab (25.4% [20.0-32.1]) versus placebo (37.5% [31.1-44.6]). In patients requiring 1 or more dose of SCSs, total (mean ± SD mg/y) prednisolone-equivalent oral corticosteroid dose was lower with mepolizumab (438.9 ± 350.40) versus placebo (505.2 ± 455.091), overall and irrespective of prior sinus surgeries, blood eosinophil count, or comorbidities., Conclusions: Mepolizumab is associated with clinical benefits in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps regardless of prior SCS use and has an SCS-sparing effect., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is a condition characterized by the triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, bronchial asthma, and hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This article explores the current knowledge on the various pathological mechanism(s) of N-ERD-such as arachidonic acid metabolism, cysteinyl leukotrienes, prostaglandins, platelets, IgE, mast cells, eosinophils, basophils, and innate immune system-and the role of omalizumab in its management. The authors dive deep into the role of IgE in N-ERD and its potential as a therapeutic target. IgE plays a significant role in mediating allergic reactions, is intricately linked with mast cells, interacts with multiple immunopathological pathways involved in N-ERD, and tends to be elevated in patients with N-ERD. Multiple real-world studies, observational studies, and case series, as well as 2 phase III trials, have demonstrated the effectiveness of omalizumab in the management of N-ERD. For a disease with such a well-documented history, the pathophysiology of N-ERD and the most effective ways to manage it remain a mystery. With this background, the authors ask-is IgE a missing piece of the N-ERD puzzle, thus explaining the efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of the disease?, (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) can be a frustratingly complex syndrome to treat. Until recently, standard medical and surgical therapies for patients' asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis were the primary treatment modalities available, combined with either complete avoidance of all aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, or aspirin desensitization and initiation of high-dose aspirin therapy. There are now several targeted respiratory biologics added to the available armament for patients with AERD and choosing between this ever-growing list of options can be daunting for both patients and their clinicians. This review includes our understanding and interpretation of the existing data for each option, along with our own approach to weighing the pros and cons of each treatment for individual patients., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) consists of asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps, and hypersensitivity to aspirin and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Nasal Lysine Aspirin Challenge is an effective tool for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity to aspirin and/or NSAIDs in patients with AERD. However, there is no unified international consensus version to perform nasal provocation tests (NPTs)., Objective: To investigate the effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), montelukast, on the lysine-acetylsalicylate (L-ASA) nasal challenge., Methods: We included 86 patients divided into 3 samples: group A (AERD without LTRA), group B (AERD with LTRA), and the control group (NSAID-tolerant asthmatics). NPT with L-ASA was performed with 25 mg of L-ASA every 30 minutes 4 times followed by rhinomanometry and spirometric measurements and evaluation of symptoms using a novel clinical scale., Results: In group A, 94.5% of patients (35 of 37) developed a positive response to NPT (drop >40% in total nasal flow), whereas only 46% of group B subjects (13 of 28) showed a positive response to the nasal challenge (P < .001). Control subjects did not show any response to the L-ASA challenge. A novel clinical score demonstrated accuracy in classifying the hypersensitivity to aspirin and/or NSAIDs when patients avoid LTRA (33 of 37)., Conclusion: Patients with AERD without LTRA showed a greater positive response to the L-ASA challenge than those taking this drug; therefore, LTRA treatment should be discontinued before the challenge for optimal diagnostic accuracy., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a complex heterogeneous disease with different phenotypes and endotypes. Recent advances in our understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of CRS endotypes have led to the introduction of effective biologic agents for CRS management. Traditionally, CRS phenotypes have been divided into with or without nasal polyps depending on the presence of polyps. Although this classification does not reflect the various endotypes that are recently emerging, it is simple and easily recognized by clinicians. Other phenotypes of CRS are fungal rhinosinusitis (including invasive and noninvasive subtypes), infectious rhinosinusitis, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, cystic fibrosis, pediatric CRS, and CRS associated with systemic diseases. This article reviews the diagnostic approaches and up-to-date treatment strategies for each CRS phenotype with the hope that a better understanding of endotypes will result in a more scientific understanding of phenotypes and precise, personalized treatments., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aspirin challenge and desensitization remains the criterion standard in diagnosis and treatment for patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), but the protocols can be time and resource intensive., Objective: To provide evidence that oral aspirin challenge and desensitization can be safely performed in an outpatient setting in 1 day., Methods: Forty-four patients with a confirmed diagnosis of AERD, stable asthma, and baseline FEV 1 value greater than or equal to 70% of predicted completed an oral aspirin challenge and desensitization protocol. The starting dose was 40.5 mg with escalating doses of aspirin (81, 162.5, 325 mg) at 90-minute intervals until symptoms were provoked. Desensitization was defined as tolerating a repeated administration of the provocative aspirin dose and at least 1 subsequent dose, bringing the total aspirin ingested during the in-clinic desensitization to 325 mg or more., Results: Ninety-three percent of patients completed the challenge and desensitization in 1 day, with an average protocol completion time of 9 hours and 29 minutes. Two patients (4.6%) chose to complete the protocol over 2 days. One patient (2.3%) was discontinued from the protocol because of ongoing abdominal discomfort and diarrhea. No patient required epinephrine, emergency department visit, or hospitalization., Conclusions: Patients with AERD on a stable asthma regimen and with a baseline FEV 1 value greater than or equal to 70% can be safely desensitized to aspirin using a 90-minute dose escalation protocol, starting at a dose of 40.5 mg, and defining desensitization as tolerance of the repeated provocation dose and at least 1 subsequent aspirin dose, bringing total cumulative daily dose to 325 mg or more. This protocol can routinely be completed in 1 day., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The high levels of eicosanoid production and the clinical efficacy of leukotriene-modifying pharmacotherapies for patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) suggest that other interventions targeting arachidonic acid dysregulation may also improve disease control., Objective: To assess the utility of a high omega-3/low omega-6 diet for the treatment of AERD., Methods: Prospective, nonblinded dietary intervention in 10 adult patients with AERD at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA. The primary objective was for subjects to reduce dietary omega-6 fatty acid consumption to less than 4 g/d and increase omega-3 intake to more than 3 g/d. The primary outcome was change in urinary leukotriene E 4 , with changes in other eicosanoids, platelet activation, lung function, and patient-reported questionnaires also assessed., Results: Of the 10 subjects who screened for the study, all 10 completed the dietary intervention. Urinary leukotriene E 4 decreased by 0.17 ng/mg (95% CI, -0.29 to -0.04; P = .02) and tetranor prostaglandin D-M decreased by 0.66 ng/mg creatinine (95% CI, -1.21 to -0.11; P = .02). There was a 15.1-point reduction in the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score (95% CI, -24.3 to -6.0; P = .01), a 0.27-point reduction in the 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score (95% CI, -0.52 to -0.03; P = .03), and no change in FEV 1 % predicted (P = .92) or forced vital capacity % predicted (P = .74). All patients lost some weight over the 2-week intervention period, and there were no diet-associated adverse events., Conclusions: A high omega-3/low omega-6 diet may be an appropriate adjunct treatment option for patients with AERD., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) are distinguished from patients with aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA) by significantly higher baseline concentrations of urinary leukotriene E 4 (uLTE 4 ). However, an overlap between the individual values of the groups exists., Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the discriminative value of uLTE 4 concentration in differentiating between patients with AERD and patients with ATA and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of uLTE 4 measurement alone and added to clinical parameters to predict AERD diagnosis in patients with asthma., Methods: Clinical data were collected from questionnaires. Spirometry, skin prick tests, total IgE, and blood eosinophilia were evaluated. ULTE 4 concentrations were measured in morning urine samples by enzyme-linked immune assay (ELISA)., Results: Patients with AERD (n = 247) had significantly higher uLTE 4 concentrations than those with ATA (n = 239). The uLTE 4 concentration of 800.0 pg/mg creatinine as measured by ELISA on a spot sample best discriminated the 2 groups (area under the curve 0.7; 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.74, sensitivity 49%, specificity 81%). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV), after considering the prevalence of AERD in the population of asthmatics, were 16% and 96%, respectively. Nasal polyps, upper airway symptoms, nasal corticosteroid treatment, asthma exacerbations, forced expiratory volume in the 1 second predicted, and age of asthma onset were independent predictors of AERD diagnosis. The addition of elevated uLTE 4 concentration to the set of clinical parameters enhanced slightly the prediction of AERD diagnosis beyond the level predicted by clinical parameters (P = .036)., Conclusions: A set of typical clinical parameters has a superior accuracy in prediction of AERD diagnosis than the measurement of uLTE 4 concentration alone. The addition of uLTE 4 concentration to clinical parameters slightly enhances the prediction of AERD diagnosis, especially due to a high NPV., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) comprises the triad of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and intolerance to inhibitors of the cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) enzyme. The prevalence of AERD remains unclear, and few studies have compared the clinical characteristics of patients with AERD to those with CRSwNP alone, asthma alone, or both CRSwNP and asthma., Objective: To determine the prevalence of AERD within a tertiary care setting, and to identify unique clinical features that could distinguish these patients from those with both CRSwNP and asthma or with CRSwNP alone., Methods: Electronic medical records of patients at Northwestern in Chicago, Illinois, were searched by computer algorithm and then manual chart review to identify 459 patients with CRSwNP alone, 412 with both CRSwNP and asthma, 171 with AERD, and 300 with asthma only. Demographic and clinical features including sex, atopy, and sinus disease severity were characterized., Results: The prevalence of AERD among patients with CRSwNP was 16%. Patients with AERD had undergone 2-fold more sinus surgeries (P < .001) and were significantly younger at the time of their first surgery (40 ± 13 years) than were patients with CRSwNP (43 ± 14 years; P < .05). Atopy was significantly more prevalent in patients with AERD (84%) or asthma (85%) than in patients with CRSwNP (66%, P < .05). More patients with AERD (13%) had corticosteroid-dependent disease than patients with both CRSwNP and asthma (4%, P < .01) or asthma (1%, P < .001)., Conclusions: AERD is common among patients with CRSwNP; even though patients with AERD have CRSwNP and asthma, the clinical course of their disease is not the same as of patients who have CRSwNP and asthma but are tolerant to COX-1 inhibitors., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are some of the most common culprits of drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions, and can lead to a wide array of adverse effects. The accurate and timely diagnosis of aspirin and NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions is important for both patient safety and for the initiation of appropriate disease-specific management and treatment. Because there are no reliably validated in vitro tests available, aspirin and NSAID challenges are considered to be the criterion standard for the diagnosis of these hypersensitivity reactions, though in some patients the diagnosis can be made on the basis of a clear clinical history., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Some patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and eosinophilia report angina-type chest pain that occurs at rest and responds to corticosteroid therapy. The frequency of eosinophilia-associated coronary artery vasospasm in patients with AERD, a disease characterized by blood and respiratory tissue eosinophilia, however, is unknown., Objective: The objective of this study was to understand the cause of the chest pain described above and determine the most appropriate treatment for it., Methods: A chart review of 153 patients with AERD who are followed at Brigham and Women's Hospital was performed. Patients who reported any type of chest pain were assessed for the presence of cardiac risk factors, eosinophilia, and response of chest pain to a variety of treatments. Two patients with AERD and eosinophilia who had recurrent chest pain due to suspected vasospasm are described in detail, and 8 other cases are also summarized., Results: Of the 153 patients reviewed, 10 had a history of chest pain concerning for ischemia. Of the 10 patients with chest pain, 8 had undergone aspirin desensitization and initiated high-dose aspirin therapy; of these, 6 reported an increase in the frequency or severity of chest pain while on high-dose aspirin with improvement after aspirin discontinuation or dose reduction. Many patients had traditional cardiac risk factors, but none had any evidence of coronary atherosclerosis; almost all had significant eosinophilia. Their chest pain did not improve with typical antianginal treatments but did respond to corticosteroid therapy., Conclusions: Although uncommon, patients with AERD can develop eosinophilia-associated coronary artery vasospasm, which is occasionally worsened by high-dose aspirin. Patients with AERD who present with symptoms of ischemic chest pain should be screened for eosinophilia, as early treatment with corticosteroids can be life-saving., Competing Interests: None of the above authors have a relevant conflict of interest, (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) is a well-validated marker of the cysteinyl leukotriene pathway, and LTE4 elevation has been described in conditions such as asthma, aspirin sensitivity, and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). There have been a number of reports investigating the role of spot urine LTE4 to predict aspirin sensitivity; however, variability in urinary LTE4 may affect the accuracy of this approach., Objective: Here, we explored the utility of 24-hour urinary LTE4 in 5 clinical diagnoses of allergic rhinitis, asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), CRS without nasal polyps, and aspirin sensitivity., Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who had 24-hour quantification of urinary LTE4 by a clinically validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method and their assigned diagnoses after assessment and clinical care., Results: Twenty-four-hour urinary LTE4 elevations were seen in those with asthma and those with CRSwNP but influenced by underlying aspirin sensitivity. Elevation in LTE4 was significant in those with CRSwNP after adjusting for aspirin sensitivity. Allergic rhinitis was not associated with elevated LTE4 excretion. Receiver operator characteristic analysis of 24-hour urinary LTE4 showed that a cutoff value of 166 pg/mg Cr suggested the presence of history of aspirin sensitivity with 89% specificity, whereas a cutoff value of 241 pg/mg Cr discriminated "challenge-confirmed" aspirin-sensitive subjects with 92% specificity., Conclusions: Elevated 24-hour excretion of urinary LTE4 is a reliable and simple test to identify aspirin sensitivity in patients with respiratory diagnoses., Competing Interests: The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is an asthma phenotype with a prevalence that ranges from 2% to 25% of the asthma population. The 2% prevalence applies to patients with mild and 25% to severe, persistent asthma. COX-1-inhibiting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including aspirin, aggravate the preexisting upper and lower respiratory disease, sometimes in a life-threatening manner. The upper airway disease is characterized by an eosinophilic, hyperplastic rhinosinusitis with polyps. Eosinophilia, both peripheral and in the airways with Th2 inflammation, characterizes this disease. The role of allergic sensitivity in AERD is unclear, even though more than 30% of affected patients produce specific IgE to environmental allergens. Clinically, the respiratory symptoms are not usually associated with allergen exposure. The mechanism responsible for this phenotype is likely related to leukotriene (LT) metabolism because patients who are affected compared with patients who were aspirin tolerant, produce greater amounts of cysteinyl LTs. The synthesis of cysteinyl LTs is further increased after aspirin challenge and symptom exacerbation. Eosinophilia as well as a variety of other biologic markers, for example, Th2 cytokines, peripheral blood periostin, and LT enzymes and receptors, are associated with AERD both in the blood and in respiratory mucosa. These markers may help identify patients with AERD, but aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs challenge is the primary means to confirm the diagnosis. A variety of single nucleotide polymorphisms and genes are associated with AERD, but the studies to date are limited to select populations and have not conclusively demonstrated a uniform genetic pattern in subjects with this disease. Treatment of AERD can be challenging because the nasal symptoms, including polyposis, are often refractory to both surgery and medical treatment, and the asthma can be difficult to control. Aspirin desensitization, followed by daily aspirin administration, can improve both upper and lower respiratory tract symptoms in up to 60% of individuals., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: A large percentage of patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) report the development of alcohol-induced respiratory reactions, but the true prevalence of respiratory reactions caused by alcoholic beverages in these patients was not known., Objective: We sought to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of alcohol-induced respiratory reactions in patients with AERD., Methods: A questionnaire designed to assess alcohol-induced respiratory symptoms was administered to patients at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Scripps Clinic. At least 50 patients were recruited into each of 4 clinical groups: (1) patients with aspirin challenge-confirmed AERD, (2) patients with aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA), (3) patients with aspirin tolerance and with chronic rhinosinusitis, and (4) healthy controls. Two-tailed Fisher exact tests with Bonferroni corrections were used to compare the prevalence of respiratory symptoms among AERD and other groups, with P ≤ .017 considered significant., Results: The prevalence of alcohol-induced upper (rhinorrhea and/or nasal congestion) respiratory reactions in patients with AERD was 75% compared with 33% with aspirin-tolerant asthma, 30% with chronic rhinosinusitis, and 14% with healthy controls (P < .001 for all comparisons). The prevalence of alcohol-induced lower (wheezing and/or dyspnea) respiratory reactions in AERD was 51% compared with 20% in aspirin-tolerant asthma and with 0% in both chronic rhinosinusitis and healthy controls (P < .001 for all comparisons). These reactions were generally not specific to one type of alcohol and often occurred after ingestion of only a few sips of alcohol., Conclusion: Alcohol ingestion causes respiratory reactions in the majority of patients with AERD, and clinicians should be aware that these alcohol-induced reactions are significantly more common in AERD than in controls who are aspirin tolerant., (Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)