Search

This article analyzes and integrates the 60 nominated articles for the best articles in the Journal of Advertising from its first 50 years, with a focus on the final 15 that were selected as the overall best articles. Hence, the purpose of this article is to highlight the contributions of these articles and their overall influence on advertising research. To this end, the authors synthesize these articles into an organizing framework that is used to analyze the contributions of this research collective. The framework also helps to understand distinct aspects of advertising and identify areas of research that can continue to build on the legacy of the contributions of these articles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, we first compare adolescents' responses to two formats (easily recognizable versus not easily recognizable) Internet ads. We find that Internet literacy and ad skepticism are necessary for adolescents to effectively apply persuasion knowledge to identify both ad formats. Second, we demonstrate that parental mediation and parents' levels of Internet skills are critical for children's development of Internet literacy. As a result, this article advances our understanding of adolescents' responses to different Internet ad formats and the influential role of parental mediation in facilitating children's development of such skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors examine the influence of olfactory sensitivity on the effectiveness of olfactory imagery in advertising. Findings reveal that the use of olfactory imagery can negatively impact ratings for ads, the product advertised, and likelihood to buy, especially for individuals sensitive to smell. The authors demonstrate that the act of sniffing can reverse the negative effects of olfactory imagery in olfactory sensitive individuals. An event-related potential (ERP) study provides evidence of emotions triggered during sniffing and forming olfactory imagery, explaining the underlying mechanism behind the observed behavioral and perceptual effects. Results show that olfactory imagery has an impact on the evaluation of ads, with a possible negative impact for sensitive individuals. Furthermore, the article demonstrates that these effects can be reversed by introducing sniffing cues in the ad. Thus, the use of a multimethod approach, combining behavioral and neuroscience experiments, provides insight into the effectiveness of advertising strategies in consideration of individual differences in consumer olfactory sensitivity. This article provides support for advertisers to consider incorporating sniffing cues (to trigger positive scent- associated emotions) in the construction of scent-relevant ads to enhance positive ratings of ads. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]