Search

Presents a review of paper published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1976–1979 and 1989–1992. Criteria noted on the submission of the papers; Final analysis on the characteristics of authors under the headings; General topics addressed in papers.

Presents an analysis of papers published in the "Journal of Advanced Nursing" throughout 2002. Country of origin of the papers; Categorization of the papers; Data collection methods used in empirical papers.

Presents a brief review of papers published in the 'Journal of Advanced Nursing,' 1983–1992. Classification of paper; Topics covered in the papers; Number of publications and papers featured.

Focuses on the selection of keywords for several research papers to be published in the "Journal of Advanced Nursing." Limitation in the number of keywords for each paper; Categories of selecting keywords for papers.

The article discusses the new format for the "Journal of Advanced Nursing." The section that features research papers is subdivided into the categories Original Research and Research Methodology. The journal will also publish theoretical research studies that offer scholarly analysis and discussion of conceptual, philosophical, theoretical or professional issues that have relevance to the journal's readership.

lindsay b. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 45(1), 84–94 Randomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: creating bias and unreliability? The randomized controlled trial is viewed by many researchers as the ‘gold standard’ research design. It is used increasingly to evaluate the effectiveness of socially complex activities such as nursing interventions. This use is seen by many commentators as problematic, while others are concerned about the quality of many published trial reports. One area of concern is that of intervention bias: the impact that a sentient intervention, such as a nursing one, may have consciously or unconsciously on study outcomes. This paper reports on an analysis of intervention definitions and possible intervention bias in 47 reports of randomized controlled trials of nursing interventions published in 2000 or 2001. This study evaluates four characteristics of the included reports: intervention sample size, intervention definition, involvement of intervention nurses in other aspects of the trial, and the claimed generalizability of results. Reports of randomized controlled trials published in 2000 or 2001 were identified. Full-text versions of 47 papers were obtained and information about the four characteristics was extracted and analysed. Problems relating to possible intervention bias were identified in each of the papers. Inadequate intervention definition was the commonest problem, leading to difficulties in calculating the ‘intervention dose’ and in replicating or generalizing from the studies. None of the included studies met the requirements of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. Four types of intervention bias were identified, and their possible implications for the reporting of trials of nursing interventions are discussed. This was a small-scale study, limited by time and resources. Its results are suggestive of a major problem of intervention bias but larger-scale investigations are necessary to quantify its extent. Intervention bias is potentially a problem in randomized controlled trials. Lack of detail about interventions in published papers could be corrected by stricter adherence to guidelines such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, but this will not correct the underlying problem of inadequate study design that appears to be widespread in randomized controlled trials of nursing interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, the relationship between theory and research has received more attention. It seems that in the past 10 to 15 years more research studies have been published that are more or less conceptualized within (nursing) theories. However, it is not always clear how the theory has been used. The purpose of this study was to analyse the role of theory in nursing practice research. To this end, papers published in six nursing journals between 1986 and 1990 have been studied. It can be concluded that, in comparison with earlier analyses, the use of theories in nursing research studies has increased (from 13% to 21%), but the use of nursing theories has not become more frequent. However, the testing of nursing theories is minimal. On the other hand, research results are being cumulated progressively in regard to theory or to other research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. This paper is a critique of the use of critical incident technique in nursing and a demonstration of how its development has resulted in inconsistency and confusion. Background. Critical incident technique is used globally by nurse researchers to explore a plethora of nursing issues. Its main strengths are flexibility and adaptability, but its popularity has resulted in ambiguity and confusion. Data sources. A search of the CINAHL database for the period 1956-2007 was performed using the search terms critical incident technique and nursing. Together with hand searching, this produced a total of 59 papers. The papers were analysed according to country of origin, research topic, sample size, data collection method, inclusion/exclusion criteria, data analysis and terminology. We then categorized the results of this analysis depending on similarities and differences in the papers. Discussion. We focus on two areas: methodology and terminology. From a methodological perspective critical incident technique has become inconsistent and in relation to terminology, the diverse language associated with the technique has created confusion. Moreover, issues of rigour may be compromised as a result of this inconsistency. A great deal of inconsistency has been created by nurse researchers' attempts to advance critical incident technique. This has led to confusion, which is not helpful for advancing nursing knowledge. Conclusion. While embracing the continued development of critical incident technique, we advocate a standardized approach to its use. Unless nurse researchers are alert to the methodological and terminological inconsistencies in use of the critical incident technique, it risks becoming an interminable quagmire through which navigation will be impossible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Title. Is children’s choice in health care rhetoric or reality? A scoping review. Aim. This paper is a report of a scoping review examining children and young people’s health services with respect to choice in order to inform future development of choice initiatives. Background. The importance of including children and young people in the choice agenda reflects the increasing acknowledgement that, individually and collectively, they are important consumers of health care in their own right. Data sources. A scoping review of all major health and medical research databases was undertaken using current guidelines to identify original relevant research papers and grey literature sources from 1990 to 2006. Review methods. Reference Manager software was used to collate, summarize, categorize, store and retrieve the search results. Papers meeting the inclusion criteria were read in full and descriptively summarized using a data extraction sheet. Each paper was repeatedly selected using a snowballing approach until saturation was reached. Results. Children and young people want more say in the planning and development of appropriate hospital and community health services. However, little evaluative research was found about whether these choices are acted upon and lead to more responsive services. Conclusion. Choice for children and young people is viewed as a positive development in health care and many innovative examples of their involvement in decision-making were found. These illustrated that, given the opportunity, children and young people are willing and able to make decisions about their healthcare services. However, there is a long way to go before the rhetoric of the choice agenda is realized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Title. Exploring research supervision through Peshkin’s I’s: the yellow brick road Aim. This paper is a report of a systematic approach used to explore subjectivity as a research student and demonstrates how the process enhanced the quality of the research experience. Background. High non-completion rates of research students are of global concern and means of enhancing the quality of the doctoral experience are needed. Among the literature on doctoral education, very little is authored by students. This paper is influenced by the work of Peshkin from the discipline of education. Peshkin articulated the need for researchers to systematically identify their subjectivity by searching for their subjective I’s. I share my experience of adopting this approach as a research student by using reflexive journal entries made during 2005–2007 as data. Findings. I use the analogy of the ‘Yellow Brick Road’ from The Wizard of Oz to represent my experience of being a doctoral student and draw comparisons between my subjectivity and the characters in the story. I demonstrate how a systematic approach to exploring my subjectivity revealed aspects of my being as a research student that had potential for influence throughout the entirety of my experience. I argue that cognizance of my subjective I’s improved the quality of my research endeavour. Conclusion. The approach is offered for consideration by other research students as a means of exploring subjectivity. I argue that the resultant self-awareness can enhance the quality of the doctoral experience. The flexibility of the approach means it has transferability across a number of disciplines and cultural contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is concerned with the evaluation of a workshop for teachers of nursing devoted to an individualized teaching and learning strategy. The paper gives a brief account of the history of such workshops and continues by defining individualized teaching. Following this the characteristics of the Keller Plan strategy are outlined. This is followed by details of the course organization; its aims and objectives, and the characteristics of the course members. Finally, the method of evaluation is described and results are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. This paper is a report of a concept analysis of forgiveness. Background. Worldwide interest in and funding for forgiveness research has brought about a body of knowledge from many disciplines that could be clinically useful to nursing. At this time, nurse scholars are beginning to challenge one another to focus on this important area of inquiry. To date, however, most scholarship on forgiveness has been conducted in related disciplines, rather than in nursing. Conceptual and theoretical work is needed in nursing to promote knowledge development in this area. Method. The CINAHL, Medline and PsycInfo databases were searched for papers published between 1990 and 2007 using the keywords, forgiveness, forgive, or reconciliation in the title or abstract. The non-linear evolutionary process of concept analysis was used to identify the concept of interest, its origins, realm, attributes and context, characteristics, and implications. Forgiveness was also explored from an international multi-cultural perspective. An exemplar is included to illuminate the concept. A total of 34 scholarly works from a variety of disciplines were included in the analysis. Findings. A definition of forgiveness emerged from the analysis, as well as a multicultural understanding of the concept. Three important attributes of forgiveness are that it is the relinquishing of a negative response, replacing the negative response with a benevolent response, and a process that occurs over time. Multi-cultural attributes centre on group harmony, re-establishing harmonious connections between people, and the morality of considering others as worthy of love and understanding. Conclusion. A multi-cultural understanding of forgiveness may provide the impetus for further theory development and research in nursing, and could be used to educate nurses on beginning interventions in this area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Provides an overview of studies featured in the October 2005 issue of "Journal of Advanced Nursing." "Overweight and Obese Children: Mothers' Strategies"; "In-Hospital Care Pathway Delays: Gender and Myocardial Infarction"; "Parenting Experiences During Cancer."

kearney p.m. & pryor j. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 46(2), 162–170 The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and nursing Nursing conceptualizes disability from largely medical and individual perspectives that do not consider its social dimensions. Disabled people are critical of this paradigm and its impact on their health care. The aims of this paper are to review the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), including its history and the theoretical models upon which it is based and to discuss its relevance as a conceptual framework for nursing. The paper presents a critical overview of concepts of disability and their implications for nursing and argues that a broader view is necessary. It examines ICF and its relationship to changing paradigms of disability and presents some applications for nursing. The ICF, with its acknowledgement of the interaction between people and their environments in health and disability, is a useful conceptual framework for nursing education, practice and research. It has the potential to expand nurses’ thinking and practice by increasing awareness of the social, political and cultural dimensions of disability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

whitehead l. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 45(5), 512–518 Enhancing the quality of hermeneutic research: decision trail Researchers have ethical and professional obligations to produce research of a high standard. The constituents of quality in research appear to differ between authors, leaving readers unsure about which pathway to follow. This can reflect inadequate consideration of the theoretical framework guiding the study. Many papers fail to consider the theoretical underpinnings of the methodology chosen and the link between these and the methods employed. These need to be accessible to readers in order to assess the trustworthiness of the research. This paper discusses the development of trustworthiness in hermeneutic phenomenological research. Referring to a study on lived experience of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/myalgic encephalitis, I describe the decision trail and discuss the strengths and limitations of the choices made throughout the study. The methodology focused my approach more fully on the importance of recognizing the influences that I brought to the study and the impact of these in generating the data. It highlighted the fact that the process of setting out my horizon can never be complete, the importance of analysing the data at a macro and micro level, acknowledging the evolution of the data over time, and ensuring that analysis does not move beyond the data and out of the hermeneutic circle. In seeking to make the decision trail clear to others, researchers must distill the philosophical principles of the methodology and set these out in a way that is accessible and open to scrutiny. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents a summary of articles and studies featured in the September 15, 2003 of the "Journal of Advanced Nursing." Influence of stress on the genesis, onset and maintenance of cardiovascular diseases; Conceptual framework for collaborative patient-centered care; Critical care nursing research priorities in Hong Kong; Development and implementation of nursing minimum data set.

BACKGROUND: Observation is used in research in two ways - structured and unstructured. Which of these methods to choose depends on the research question but will be defined predominantly by the paradigm underlying each study. Positivistic research generally uses structured observation and interpretist/naturalistic paradigms use unstructured observation. This paper is concerned with unstructured observation. AIM: To discuss the importance of unstructured observation as a research method and to examine critically the problems associated with both access and field notes. APPLICATION TO NURSING: Although unstructured observation has been used in nursing research, it is less favoured than the interview. Furthermore, although some of the dilemmas concerned with observation such as the role of the researcher, covert research and informed consent have received attention in the nursing literature, other aspects remain relatively unexplored. In particular little has been written concerning access to the field and field notes. Both of these aspects have practical and theoretical considerations that require the attention of the researcher. This omission may partly explain nurses' apparent reluctance to use unstructured observation in their studies. This paper seeks to redress this situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIMS: This paper provides a theoretical understanding of narrative research and its use in research. It aims to expose the ways narrative research, when taken beyond the researcher's lone analysis of text, can contribute to the development of clinical knowledge. BACKGROUND: Methodological approaches involving the construction of narratives are increasingly apparent in the nursing and allied health literature. Narratives, constructed from stories of nursing practice, become texts available for analysis. This is undertaken predominantly by a researcher engaged in a lone activity with little involvement of those contributing the stories. METHODS: This paper is drawn from a critical praxis study of nurse-patient friendship utilizing participatory research processes. The nurses involved in the study were co-researchers in an indepth study of their relationships with patients. FINDINGS: The paper traces the movement from naive story, through individual narratives during interviews with each nursing and demonstrates the changes in understanding about the narrative accounts that occurred during the participatory group process. CONCLUSION: The nurses involved in this study were able, through the use of narrative stories reexamined in a group context, to develop new insights and understandings about their practice. Knowledge generated in these ways remains grounded in the real life world of clinical nursing and gives voice to the complexity of those aspects of nursing practice that are taken for granted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Women’s anxieties surrounding breast disorders: a systematic review of the literature A systematic review of the research literature published in English between 1990 and 1999 was carried out to discover whether women with benign breast disorders suffer similar amounts of anxiety to women with breast cancer in the time between discovery of the problem and receiving a diagnosis, to include the immediate postdiagnosis phase. The study was limited to primary research papers with explicit methodology applicable to hospital specialist breast clinics where the main focus of the papers was anxiety and/or psychological distress. Studies focusing exclusively on routine breast screening or exclusively on women with previously diagnosed breast cancer were omitted. A protocol for the review was agreed at the outset, addressing selection criteria, search procedures, methods of data extraction and analysis, and dissemination. Search terms were refined as the study progressed. A data extraction tool was constructed based on Benton and Cormack’s framework (, pp. 80–81). An initial search revealed 89 papers. Fourteen papers were found to meet the criteria for inclusion. The main findings were that women with benign breast disorders and those with breast cancer suffered from similar levels of anxiety and psychological distress in the period from first being aware of the problem up to the time of receiving a diagnosis. Anxiety levels were found to fall more quickly in women with benign disorders postdiagnosis. Methodological flaws were detracted from the rigour of many of the studies. Implications for practice are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Qualitative data analysis is a complex and contested part of the research process that has received limited theoretical attention. This paper explores the relationship between the way in which data are analysed and the nature of findings that emerge. It does this in response to demands to recognize the multiple voices that inform representations of reality, and debates about whether the interpretation of data reveals or constructs meaning. A small segment of data provided by one informant is subjected to both thematic and narrative analysis and the different perspectives that emerge are discussed with reference to whether different kinds of analysis lead to different kinds of meaning being imputed to the same text. The paper suggests that, rather than provide a unified and ever-more refined version of 'reality', the use of dual or multiple analysis helps to elucidate alternative interpretations of the data which might escape consideration with the use of a single approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discusses research design and methodology used in conducting randomized controlled trials. Analysis of the methodological quality of research undertaken by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group; Sources of standards for good practice in the design and conduct of clinical trials.

By examining the relationship between the cultural construction of female sexuality and the lack of potential for many young heterosexual women to be truly sexually healthy this paper submits that messages for women within HIV prevention programmes can be confused, confining and at times dangerous to women's health and well-being. It is suggested that these messages also reinforce a traditional, biologically determined medical understanding of female sexuality that does not take note of social or culturally based research or commentary on female experience or female desire, but rather confines many women to sexual restrictions, doing little to empower women to prevent sexual risk-taking. The ideological basis of the discussion within this paper is informed by the awareness that applications and understandings of 'sexuality' are diverse and contested within sex research traditions and will influence the choice of research concerns. The 'deterministic' explanation of sexuality that 'sexuality' (the abstract noun referring to the quality of being 'sexual', Williams 1983) is your fate or destiny and that biology causes the patterns of sexual life, is abandoned in this paper in favour of a search for a definition of sexuality which brings together a host of different biological and mental possibilities which are given meaning only in social relations. This allows for a framework for the study of sexuality that relates it to other social phenomena, particularly economic, political and social structures (Foucault 1979); in other words, a study of the 'social construction' of sexuality. This paper suggests that health care professionals need to develop an awareness of the diversities within female sexuality and gain insight into their own values and assumptions about female sexuality if these are not to inhibit effective approaches and interventions in the areas of HIV and sexual health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is a methodological discussion on a qualitative research project which involved interviewing lesbians and gay men about their experiences of nursing care. The research project arose primarily because most of the knowledge available on the subject was based on hearsay and anecdote. It is worthy of note that those who felt there was an issue to be addressed, as well as the bearers of anecdote, were by and large what would be termed 'insiders' in ethnographic research, and zealots with an axe to grind in less academic circles. It is the nature of this 'insider' status which is of interest throughout the research process of what was and remains a sensitive research topic. 'Insider' status can reduce many of the problems associated with conducting sensitive research in terms of access, rapport with subjects, ethical concerns, and stigma contagion, but by the same token lays researchers open to the charge of bias thought to be inherent in going native, or rather in this case being native. However, there are some problems associated with 'insider' status as well and this paper offers a discussion of the methodological problems we have encountered in relation to this, as well as more general methodological issues when conducting research considered to be sensitive. Ethical dilemmas also arose during the research when lesbian and gay patients who were currently receiving hospital care contacted the researchers directly because they felt threatened by nursing and medical staff. The paper is an attempt to describe some fairly conscious strategies to use the research team's 'insider' status for methodological reasons and to explain the ethical position we took when we felt compromised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Title. The essence of nursing care: Polish nurses’ perspectives Aim. This paper is a report of a study to identify Polish nurses’ definition of the concept of nursing care. Background. Polish nursing currently is in a period of scientific research focusing on development of precise definitions of concepts. Definitions of nursing are influenced by culture, social expectations and healthcare systems. Accepted scientific definitions of concepts should be based on empirical verification that takes theoretical and practical perspectives into account. Methods. A survey questionnaire was constructed from analysis of a random sample of 27 essays about nursing care that had been completed by 300 Polish nurses. The survey questionnaire, which was designed to measure the essence of nursing care, was completed by 324 Polish nurses during 2004 and 2005. Findings. Analysis of survey questionnaire responses revealed that the essence of nursing care encompasses providing care, communicating, supporting, helping, assisting, accompanying and managing. Participants indicated that nursing care recipients include healthy persons, ill persons and persons at risk for disease. Conclusion. The concept of nursing care encompasses several traits or characteristics that can be applied to both well and ill people. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. In this paper we present a theory-based taxonomy of the methods used to implement change in practice. Background. Implementation research is characterized by inconsistent terminology for the methods employed and inattention to differences in the relevance of methods across different disciplines. Studies of the effectiveness of implementation have yielded mixed results. Positive effects shown have been small. The limited success of many efforts to implement change in practice may be due, in part, to the absence of a framework to guide the use of implementation methods. Method. A provisional taxonomy of implementation methods, derived from theory and existing taxonomies, was used to content analyse a convenience sample of 43 reports of empirical studies of the implementation of one or more research-based practice changes involving nurses that had been published between 1995 and 2005. This taxonomy was revised throughout the course of analysis to capture more completely the information in each report. Findings. Following the analysis, nine of the 11 methods in the provisional taxonomy were retained, two were removed and five new methods were identified. The final taxonomy includes 14 implementation methods organized into five categories: (a) increasing coordination; (b) raising awareness; (c) persuasion via interpersonal channels; (d) persuasion via reinforcing belief that behaviour will lead to desirable results and (e) increasing behavioural control. Conclusions. The taxonomy presented here differs from prior taxonomies by focusing on nursing and by providing a clear and mutually exclusive guide to implementation methods. By deriving the initial coding strategy from theory, the taxonomy links the methods to theoretical constructs that may inform the selection of methods across different practice changes and settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: The paper reports a study to develop and test a tool for assessing a range of factors influencing the development of evidence-based practice among clinical nurses. BACKGROUND: Achieving evidence-based practice is a goal in nursing frequently cited by the profession and in government health policy directives. Assessing factors influencing the achievement of this goal, however, is complex. Consideration needs to be given to a range of factors, including different types of evidence used to inform practice, barriers to achieving evidence-based practice, and the skills required by nurses to implement evidence-based care. METHODS: Measurement scales currently available to investigate the use of evidence in nursing practice focus on nurses' sources of knowledge and on barriers to the use of research evidence. A new, wider ranging Developing Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire was developed and tested for its measurement properties in two studies. In study 1, a sample of 598 nurses working at two hospitals in one strategic health authority in northern England was surveyed. In study 2, a slightly expanded version of the questionnaire was employed in a survey of 689 community nurses in 12 primary care organizations in two strategic health authorities, one in northern England and the other in southern England. FINDINGS: The measurement characteristics of the new questionnaire were shown to be acceptable. Ten significant, and readily interpretable, factors were seen to underlie nurses' relation to evidence-based practice. CONCLUSION: Strategies to promote evidence-based practice need to take account of the differing needs of nurses and focus on a range of sources of evidence. The Developing Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire can assist in assessing the specific 'evidencing' tendencies of any given group of nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. This paper reports a study examining the barriers associated with research knowledge transfer amongst primary care nurses in the context of clinical decision-making. Background. The research literature on barriers to nurses’ use of research knowledge is characterized by studies that rely primarily on self-report data, making them prone to reporting biases. Studies of the barriers to evidence-based practice often fail to examine information use and behaviour in the context of clinical decision-making. Methods. A multi-site, mixed method, case study was carried out in 2001. Data were collected in three primary care organizations by means of interviews with 82 primary care nurses, 270 hours of non-participant observation and 122 Q-sorts. Nurses were selected using a published theoretical sampling frame. Between-methods triangulation was employed and data analysed according to the principles of constant comparison. Multiple linear regression was used to explore relationships between a number of independent demographic variables (such as length of clinical experience) and the dependent variable of nurses’ perspectives on the barriers to their use of research knowledge. Results. Three perspectives on barriers to research information use emerged: the need to bridge the skills and knowledge gap for successful knowledge transfer; information formats need to maximize limited opportunities for consumption; and limited access in the context of limited time for decision-making and information consumption. Demographic variables largely failed to predict allegiance to any of the perspectives identified. Conclusions. Researchers should consider using decision-making as a contextual backdrop for exploring information use and behaviour, avoid relying solely on self-reported behaviour as data, and use a variety of research methods to provide a richer picture of information-related behaviour. Practice developers need to recognize that understanding the decisions to which research knowledge is to be applied should be a characteristic of any strategy to increase research uptake by nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

cutcliffe j.r. & mckenna h.p. (2004) Journal of Advanced Nursing 45(2), 126–135 Expert qualitative researchers and the use of audit trails Determining the credibility of qualitative research findings remains a contested area and leaves the way open for additional theoretical and methodological discussion. In this paper we focus on audit trails and confirmability, within the context of ‘expert’ qualitative researchers. Having outlined the audit trail process, we develop existing arguments about the ‘expert’ qualitative researcher. We then juxtapose the two, highlighting a number of issues in an attempt to advance the debate. These issues discussed are: (1) The shifting sands of methodological orthodoxy – the historical context in which audit trails emerged. (2) The individual construction of logic. (3) ‘Grounded in the data’ or ‘going beyond the words’– the key differences between descriptive and interpretive findings. (4) The singular relationship between qualitative researcher and their data. (5) The growing acknowledgement that method alone is insufficient. (6) The challenging example of visionaries. We argue that using audit trails as a means to achieve confirmability of qualitative research findings is an exaggeration of the case for method, and may do little to establish the credibility of the findings. We also introduce a preliminary case for testing the credibility of theory induced by expert qualitative researchers, in part by means of its usefulness; its ‘fit and grab’, rather than by the researcher's adherence to contemporary methodological orthodoxy. In other words, the absence of audit trails does not necessarily challenge the credibility of qualitative findings, particularly if an expert qualitative researcher produced the findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the research process in the context of an evaluation of work-based learning. The findings of the evaluation are used to illustrate issues around roles and relationships within interpretivist research where a separation is maintained between the researcher, as investigator, and the participants, as the subject of their investigation. The discussion focuses on: the threatening nature of evaluation and the way in which that affects the process of inquiry and learning; the ways in which people's perceptions of research can act as barriers to the implementation of change; and the consequences of this role separation for practice development. In exploring these issues the paper argues for an approach to evaluation research which (a) emphasizes collaboration, (b) is orientated to change and (c) treats the evaluation process as a learning opportunity through which professionals acquire the skills and knowledge to investigate and advance their own practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examination of the qualitative methodological literature shows that there appear to be conflicting opinions and unresolved issues regarding the nature and process of grounded theory. Researchers proposing to utilize this method would therefore be wise to consider these conflicting opinions. This paper therefore identifies and attempts to address four key issues, namely, sampling, creativity and reflexivity, the use of literature, and precision within grounded theory. The following recommendations are made. When utilizing a grounded method researchers need to consider their research question, clarify what level of theory is likely to be induced from their study, and then decide when they intend to access and introduce the second body of literature. They should acknowledge that in the early stages of data collection, some purposeful sampling appears to occur. In their search for conceptually dense theory, grounded theory researchers may wish to free themselves from the constraints that limit their use of creativity and tacit knowledge. Furthermore, the interests of researchers might be served by attention to issues of precision including, avoiding method slurring, ensuring theoretical coding occurs, and using predominantly one method of grounded theory while explaining and describing any deviation away from this chosen method. Such mindfulness and the resulting methodological rigour is likely to increase the overall quality of the inquiry and enhance the credibility of the findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The focus of this paper is to use three action research typologies to consider retrospectively, and understand, the processes of an empirical study. The typologies are used to plot the changing emphasis of collaborative action research with a primary health care team that addressed their health promotion practice. The study implemented self-efficacy theory into the health promotion practice of a primary health care team and developed a self-efficacy framework for smoking cessation. The framework had some success in aiding practitioners in their work despite the patients' disinterest in smoking cessation. Two action research types can be identified within the study, a technical/experimental approach which surrounded the use of a researcher-led theoretical agenda, whereas the research facilitation was informed by critical theory and was classified as an enhancement/empowering action research type. This paper demonstrates the conflicting natures of these types which, in this study, resulted in positive outcomes associated with the experimental/technical approach but only at the expense of professional empowerment. The findings of this study imply that theoretically-led empowering action research was an incompatible combination in this instance and this potential conflict needs to be addressed by researchers engaging in collaborative research relationships with practitioners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper I will suggest ways in which you may consider a story as a legitimate research product. I view the story as interpreted work communicated through writing as the research product. 'Doing' interpretive research is not an easy option in research. In this paper I will focus upon some of the complexities in creating an acceptable and accessible research product. I will cover five interrelated areas: journaling, observing, listening, writing and rigour. The term 'research product' refers to the outcome of the research process. By that I mean the dissertation, the research report or the published article. The notion of legitimacy is informed by Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics which does not show us what to do, but asks us to question what is 'going on' while researching. In this paper I ask you to consider the entire research process as a reflexive exercise which provides answers to the question: 'What is going on in methods?'. I claim that if the research product is well sign-posted, the readers will be able to travel easily through the worlds of the participants and makers of the story and decide for themselves whether the story is a legitimate research endeavour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Meeting needs is the aim of health care frequently espoused in textbooks, policy documents and reports of research studies; provision of health care is also now described as 'needs-based', rather than 'service-based'. The purpose of this paper is to explore the concept of need, using concept analysis, with the aim of providing greater clarity. Two approaches to concept analysis are compared: the linear model proposed by Walker and Avant and Rodgers' cyclical model. On both a philosophical and practical level, Rodgers' model was felt to be more appropriate for analysis of the concept of need. The rigid divisions which the Walker and Avant model seeks to establish (particularly in relation to the construction of additional cases) were felt to restrict, rather than clarify the concept. The attributes, antecedents, consequences and references of need are described, following stratified random sampling of the available literature, and a model case is presented. The themes of priority and perception of need arose consistently within the literature, highlighting the value-laden nature of the concept and the importance of achieving a common understanding to enable purchasers, providers and consumers to better satisfy health care needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper reviews the literature relating to the provision of community psychiatric nursing to demented elderly people and their informal family caregivers, and develops priorities for research in that particular area of nursing. Initially, the development of community psychiatric nursing with elderly demented people is examined. Various theoretical models articulating the family's experience of dementia are examined as a basis for identifying various priorities for research in the area. Empirical evidence relating to the efficacy of various interventions is briefly discussed. Various priorities are made regarding the development of research relating to the development of community psychiatric nursing with elderly demented people and their informal caregivers. Finally the paper is placed in the context of the present policy of refocusing psychiatric nursing on to people with serious and enduring mental disorders. It is argued that this policy should include elderly demented people not just younger people with functional mental disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this paper is to alert researchers and agency staff to potential conflicts that may arise during research projects conducted in busy community based agencies. Within a framework of human territoriality, key factors in avoiding such conflicts are explored. Territoriality is the defence against intruders of an area of land which is considered to be owned. For humans, something owned includes space, objects, ideas, privileges or rights. Key territoriality concepts explored in the paper are: the private domain, encompassing a privacy retreat and personal space; and the public arena which includes psychological space and action territory. Examples of violation of the types of territory are examined and suggestions for prevention of conflicts are provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the progress made in the measurement of the 'outcomes' of nursing. Although nursing has a long history of outcome research which extends as far back as Florence Nightingale, an examination of the literature over the past 30 years gives little impression of progress. Significant difficulties still remain in identifying outcomes relevant to nursing intervention, measurement techniques and appropriate study designs. However, progress has been made. The paper examines various recent trends which point to ways forward for outcome research. In particular it is emphasized that future work should build upon the strengths of past work in the use of measurement tools and the identification of relevant variables. Outcome research in nursing should not be limited to identifying the immediate results of nursing intervention, nor should research into 'structure' or 'process' variables be neglected. Such concepts are vital to determining the nursing contribution to changes in a patient's health and well being. The future of outcome research depends on a range of appropriate research methods and measurement techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, the author seeks to address issues of personal and professional development that may occur during the research process. Whilst research reports now abound in the nursing literature, this personal aspect is often neglected. As we seek to encourage research awareness within the profession, many student and qualified nurses now produce a small research project, and this often concentrates on measurable outcomes. By examining her own perceived learning in resolving epistemological pluralism whilst undertaking such a project as a tutor student, the author has attempted to resolve the problem of ignoring the personal. Indeed, she believes that increased self-awareness can only enhance nursing professionalism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Telephone interviews were employed by nurse researchers as a means of collecting data from elderly people following their discharge from hospital. The paper reviews the literature concerning interviews with elderly patients by telephone and recounts first-hand experience of the method on the basis of over 500 telephone interviews. Although some difficulties were encountered in conducting interviews with the hearing-impaired and the unwell, the method was found to be a cost-effective and useful means of obtaining follow-up data for research purposes. The prime factor in ensuring successful use of the method was the recruitment of subjects via personal interview prior to telephone contact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are signs that researchers and practitioners are seriously attempting to work more closely together to bring research and practice into closer alliance. This paper describes one such attempt in the form of an 'experiment' in collaboration between academic reserchers and practising nurses in the undertaking of a practice-based research project. Positive benefits of collaborative research became evident and are highlighted in this paper. No attempt was made to evaluate the 'experiment' objectively and so this is a subjective account, aimed at encouraging other efforts towards closer collaboration between researchers and practitioners in nursing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The proposition of this paper is principally that if the term 'reassurance' is used by nurses its meaning should be clearly stated and the methods by which it may be achieved should be clearly identified. The author begins by attempting to identify a workable definition of the term and by arguing a case for taking the approach that it is a nursing interpersonal skill rather than a nursing psychotherapy. Using this as the basis for the rest of the discussion he then suggests that as an interpersonal skill it is open to analysis and behaviours can be identified which help to achieve a restoration of the patient's confidence. Further to this, learning objectives are stated in the hope that the concept of reassurance can be seen as a skill which can be enhanced by educational processes. Full competence in the use of interpersonal skills is not a stable feature in all human beings; in every individual nurse there is scope for the development and training of interpersonal skills. Finally, the author attempts to achieve the major aim of the paper--stating nursing actions which may be employed in order to achieve this reassurance of the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper describes the collection, some methodological difficulties and interpretation of some data from a study carried out in the Research Unit 1969-75, with students from three intakes (1969, 1970 and 1971) to six types of experimental and the traditional scheme of nurse training. (Differences between the experimental and traditional course students are described.) It is suggested that the experimental and traditional course students from the study are different in terms of attitudes. It is also proposed that nurse training can be seen as survival of the fittest and that differences in courses result in different obstacles to be overcome. It is emphasized that the traditional courses investigated in the study are not representative of such courses in general. This paper complements an earlier paper on 'Evaluation research: the need for multiple criteria' (House 1977). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A list of review papers, research and theoretical papers to be published in the forthcoming issue of the journal is presented.

Presents views on an academic paper submitted by E. Van Teijlingen and V. Hundley and published by the 'Journal of Advanced Nursing.' Dilemmas involved in publication; Results of the delay in publication; Challenge to the researchers.

Aim. This paper is a report of a study to describe current research-related activities within community-based child health services in a large urban health service. Background. In recent years, increased participation in research-related activities has accompanied implementation of evidence-based practice in hospital-based services. Little is known about participation in these activities in community-based health services. Methods. We undertook a descriptive study of current research-related activities by staff working in community-based child health services in an urban setting in Australia in 2006-2007. Research-related activities were defined as reflective practice, quality improvement, evaluation and research. Results. Staff reported that research-related activities usually comprised reflective practice or quality improvement. These activities worked best when there were sufficient staff within teams and a stable environment. Evaluation was confined to activities closely related to quality improvement. Participation in research was limited. Our consultation revealed a need for sustained investment to build organizational and workforce capacity, and resource support and infrastructure to encourage participation in research-related activities. Conclusion. Increased focus on evidence-based practice has created expectations that community-based child health service staff will utilize and contribute to research evidence. Whilst there is interest among community-based child health service staff in participating in research-related activities, investment in leadership, skill development, infrastructure, resource and novel ways to enhance research output within these services are needed to increase participation in research-related activities, and the evidence base for community-based child health services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. The paper is a report of a study to demonstrate how the use of schematics can provide procedural clarity and promote rigour in the conduct of case study research. Background. Case study research is a methodologically flexible approach to research design that focuses on a particular case - whether an individual, a collective or a phenomenon of interest. It is known as the 'study of the particular' for its thorough investigation of particular, real-life situations and is gaining increased attention in nursing and social research. However, the methodological flexibility it offers can leave the novice researcher uncertain of suitable procedural steps required to ensure methodological rigour. Method. This article provides a real example of a case study research design that utilizes schematic representation drawn from a doctoral study of the integration of health promotion principles and practices into a palliative care organization. Discussion. The issues discussed are: (1) the definition and application of case study research design; (2) the application of schematics in research; (3) the procedural steps and their contribution to the maintenance of rigour; and (4) the benefits and risks of schematics in case study research. Conclusion. The inclusion of visual representations of design with accompanying explanatory text is recommended in reporting case study research methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. This paper is a report of a study to describe how treatment fidelity is being enhanced and monitored, using a model from the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium. Background. The objective of treatment fidelity is to minimize errors in interpreting research trial outcomes, and to ascribe those outcomes directly to the intervention at hand. Treatment fidelity procedures are included in trials of complex interventions to account for inferences made from study outcomes. Monitoring treatment fidelity can help improve study design, maximize reliability of results, increase statistical power, determine whether theory-based interventions are responsible for observed changes, and inform the research dissemination process. Methods. Treatment fidelity recommendations from the Behavior Change Consortium were applied to the SPHERE study (Secondary Prevention of Heart DiseasE in GeneRal PracticE), a randomized controlled trial of a complex intervention. Procedures to enhance and monitor intervention implementation included standardizing training sessions, observing intervention consultations, structuring patient recall systems, and using written practice and patient care plans. The research nurse plays an important role in monitoring intervention implementation. Findings. Several methods of applying treatment fidelity procedures to monitoring interventions are possible. The procedure used may be determined by availability of appropriate personnel, fiscal constraints, or time limits. Complex interventions are not straightforward and necessitate a monitoring process at trial stage. Conclusion. The Behavior Change Consortium's model of treatment fidelity is useful for structuring a system to monitor the implementation of a complex intervention, and helps to increase the reliability and validity of evaluation findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Title. Clinical decision-making skills on the developmental journey from student to Registered Nurse: a longitudinal inquiry Aim. This paper is a report of a study to explore, from the perspective of nursing students, how they acquire clinical decision-making skills and how well-prepared they feel in this respect regarding their responsibilities as Registered Nurses. Background. Previous research has focused mainly on exploring experienced nurses’ judgement and decision-making. Some studies have elicited senior nursing students’ understanding of the process, but none has explored the development of clinical decision-making skills throughout the educational programme and in the first year as a Registered Nurse. Method. A volunteer sample of 20 respondents, broadly representative of the student cohort regarding qualifications, age, gender and nursing specialty, was recruited. A longitudinal hermeneutic phenomenological study was carried out from 2000 to 2004, using interviews, reflective journals, care studies, critical incident analyses and document analysis. Findings. Ten conceptions of nursing and 10 perceptions of clinical decision-making were identified and a growing pattern of inter-relationships between them became apparent. A ‘matrix model’ was developed by cross-referencing the two thematic categories within the timeline of respondents’ developmental journey through significant milestones and changing contexts. As Registered Nurses they found having to ‘think on your feet’ without the ‘comfort blanket’ of student status both a stressful and formative learning experience. Conclusion. Further collaboration between education and health service partners is recommended to integrate clinical decision-making throughout the nursing curriculum, enhance the development of such vital skills, and facilitate the transition from student to Registered Nurse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. This paper is a report of a study to examine the reliability and validity of a Korean version of the Revised Caregiving Appraisal Scale with Korean caregivers of older stroke survivors. Background. The Revised Caregiving Appraisal Scale was developed in the United States of America for an American English-speaking population to measure primary caregivers' appraisals of potential stressors and the efficacy of their coping efforts related to caregiving experiences. Methods. Using the back-translation method, the instrument was translated into Korean. The Korean version of the Revised Caregiving Appraisal Scale was selfadministered by 147 primary family caregivers recruited from three outpatient clinics and two home health agencies in Korea. The study was conducted in 2005. Results. In this sample, Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.86. Reliability coefficients for each of the five subscales ranged from 0.40 to 0.85. Two subscales, burden and satisfaction, showed good reliability; one subscale, impact, showed marginally acceptable reliability; two subscales, mastery and demand, had low reliability. Principal components factor analysis of the Korean version of the Revised Caregiving Appraisal Scale yielded six factors. Except for the mastery domain, which was divided into two factors, the other factors were similar to those in the original scale. Conclusion. The Korean version of the Revised Caregiving Appraisal Scale had adequate reliability and validity in a sample of Korean caregivers of stroke survivors. It can be used to assess the impact of caregiving and interventions on Korean caregiver attitudes. Further studies are needed with different categories of caregiver. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. This paper is a report of a study to examine the construct validity of The Nursing Students' Attitudes and Awareness of Research and Development within Nursing Scale. Background. The validity of instruments is critical in ensuring that data collected are sound and that the data measures what it purports to measure. When a new instrument is used in a different population or when it has been modified, it is useful to re-examine the construct validity of the instrument. Method. A survey design was used in September 2004 with a sample of 615 undergraduate nursing students to test the factor structure of The Nursing Students' Attitudes and Awareness of Research and Development within Nursing Scale and to estimate its similarity to the factor structure reported for the original scale developed and tested in a group of Registered Nurses. Results. Using Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis and then Principal Axis Factoring, we were unable to obtain a similar factor structure to that originally identified for the scale. Our data resulted in a two-factor structure. One factor consisted of 16 items that reflected a positive attitude to nursing research and the other consisted of 14 items that reflected a negative attitude to nursing research. Conclusion. The substantially different factor structure identified suggests that this scale requires further refinement and testing. This case study highlights the importance of a systematic and comprehensive approach to determining construct validity of scales, thus enabling researchers to determine their suitability as data collection instruments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]