Search

Aim: To gain insight into which elements of the interpersonal care relationship (IPCR) are perceived as occurring (less) frequently and as (not) disturbing from the perspective of hospitalized older patients. Design A cross‐sectional study in three Belgian hospitals. Methods: A convenience sample of patients aged 75 years or older admitted to a non‐geriatric ward were recruited between May 2017 and April 2019. The Interpersonal Geriatric care relationship (InteGer) tool was used to identify elements of the IPCR and was completed by the researchers through structured patient interviews. Results: The mean total scale score for frequency was 3.74 (SD 1.51) [range 0–12]. On subscale level, the highest mean score was in the accessibility and the lowest mean score in the humanization subscale. Statistically significant differences between the hypothesized and experienced disturbance were observed in 18 of the 30 items. Ten items score in the category 'no action needed' (not occurring, not disturbing), nine items in the category 'remain attentive for patient experiences' (occurring, not disturbing), 10 items in the category 'further analyses or monitoring needed' (not occurring, disturbing) and one item in the category 'urgent action needed' (occurring and disturbing). Conclusion: Participants report mostly positive experiences related to the four subscales of the InteGer, that is, humanization, attentiveness, interest and accessibility. Insights from this study provide important opportunities in the context of care optimization for each category with the main focus on items with high experienced disturbance. Impact The InteGer can be used for monitoring IPCR and formulating action points at ward and hospital level to further improve the IPCR and quality of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To develop and psychometrically test the Interpersonal Geriatric care relationship tool. Background: The quality of nursing care is highly influenced by the quality of the interpersonal care relationship, yet there are no tools available that capture the conceptual breadth of the interpersonal care relationship. Design: Instrument development and psychometric testing of the content and construct validity, factor structure and reliability. Methods: A four-phased validation procedure was conducted (January 2016-April 2019): defining the construct measured by the tool, tool development, content validation and psychometric evaluation. Results: The 30-item Interpersonal Geriatric care relationship tool was subjected to exploratory factor analysis. Four components (humanization, attentiveness, interest and accessibility) were extracted. The tool demonstrated discriminating power and good internal consistency. Cronbach's alphas for the components ranged between 0.69 and 0.84. Conclusion: The Interpersonal Geriatric care relationship tool is a valuable measure that can be used by scientists, educators and healthcare professionals to benchmark the interpersonal care relationship culture in hospitals and optimize the quality of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Advanced Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Journal of Advanced Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aim: To uncover and understand the core elements of how nurses in psychiatric hospitals make contact with patients experiencing suicidal ideation. Design: A qualitative study based on the principles of grounded theory was performed. Methods: Nineteen nurses on wards of four psychiatric hospitals were interviewed between May 2017 – February 2018. The Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven was used to facilitate the constant comparison of data. Findings: Nurses make contact with patients experiencing suicidal ideation by "creating conditions for open and genuine communication" while maintaining a focus on "developing an accurate and meaningful picture of patients". These interconnected core elements represent nurses' attention to relational processes like building trust as well as their predominant focus on assessing suicide risk. Nurses put other emphases in their contacts with patients depending on whether their approach is guided more by checking and controlling suicide risk or by acknowledging and connecting (with) the person. Conclusion: The study enhances the conceptual understanding of how nurses on psychiatric wards can involve in compassionate and considerate contact and communication with patients experiencing suicidal ideation. These findings can be used to underpin the nurses' role in and contribution to suicide prevention. Impact: The core elements "creating conditions for open and genuine communication" while maintaining a focus on "developing an accurate and meaningful picture of patients" can inform policies for nursing practice and education that aim to preserve and improve the capacity of nurses to involve in compassionate and considerate contact and communication with patients experiencing suicidal ideation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim The aim of this study was to gain insight into the influence of team members in how nurses perceive and address patients' transgressive behaviour. Background Aggression and transgressive behaviour in health care have been a focus of research over the past few decades. Most studies have focused on individual nurses' experiences with aggression and transgressive behaviour. Literature examining group dynamics in nursing teams and team members' interactions in handling patients' transgressive behaviour is scarce. Design Qualitative interview study. Methods Seven focus-group interviews and two individual interviews were carried out in 2014-2016. Twenty-four nurses were drawn from eight wards in three general hospitals. Interviews were analysed using the constant comparative method influenced by the grounded theory approach. Findings While elaborating how they perceived and addressed transgressive behaviour, nurses disclosed how interactions with team members occurred. Several patterns arose. Nurses talk to one another, excuse one another, fill in for one another, warn one another and protect and safeguard one another. In these patterns in reaction to patients' transgressive behaviour, implicit group norms transpire, causing nursing teams to acquire their specific identity 'as a group'. Consequently, these informal group norms in nursing teams impinge how nurses feel threatened by patients' potential transgressive behaviour; gain protection from the group of nurses and conform to informal ward rules. Conclusion The findings of this study can support intervention strategies aimed at supporting nurses and nursing teams in managing patient aggression and transgressive behaviour by identifying and explicating these group dynamics and team members' interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. To acquire insight into the onset and meaning of transgressive behaviour from the perspective of nurses. Background. Patient aggression towards healthcare providers occurs frequently. Nurses in particular are at risk of encountering aggressive or transgressive behaviour due to the nature, duration and intensity of relationships with patients. This study analysed nurse perspectives with regard to the onset and meaning of transgressive patient behaviour in a general hospital setting. Design. Qualitative research according to the grounded theory method. Methods. Data were collected in 2011 through individual interviews with 18 nurses who were selected using purposive and theoretical sampling. Findings. Findings revealed that various nurse-patient interactions can result in episodes of transgressive behaviour, depending on the interplay of determining and regulating factors which have been identified at the patient, nurse and ward level. Experiences of transgressive behaviour are influenced by degree of control nurses experience over the provision of care; the degree of patient acceptance of organizational and ward rules, the degree of gratitude and recognition expressed by the patient and the extent of patient regard for the nurse as a person. Factors affecting transgressive experiences were a trusting relationship between patient and nurse; the extent to which patient perspectives are understood; methods of managing transgressive behaviour; and the influence of the team, head nurse and ward culture and habits. Conclusions. The results of this study can support the development of nurses' coping ability and self-confidence to mitigate or prevent experiences of transgressive behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. To gain insight in the onset and meaning of transgressive behaviour in care relationships with nurses, from the perspective of patients. Background. Aggression and transgressive behaviour in health care have been a focus of research over the last decades. Most studies describe staff experiences on patient aggression. Patient' perspectives on aggression and transgressive behaviour in interactions with nurses are rarely sought. Design. Qualitative interview study. Methods. Twenty patients were purposefully sampled from six wards of two general hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were carried out in 2011. Data were analysed using the constant comparative method influenced by the grounded theory approach. Findings. On elaborating on what constitutes experiences of transgressive behaviour, patients employ a framework of suppositions towards hospital care and nurse-patient relationships. This framework leads to implicit ideas on how competent professional caregivers will be and on how relationships with nurses will be characterized as normal human interactions. When these anticipated ideas are not met, patients feel obliged to address this discrepancy by adjusting their expectations or behaviour. Patients become more vigilant with regard to care given by nurses; search for own solutions; make excuses for nurses or reprioritize their expectations. Because of this adjustment, perceptions of transgressive behaviour are reinforced, mitigated or put into perspective. Conclusion. Patients adjust their behaviour based on what they experience in care relationships with nurses or the hospital care. It is crucial that patients feel free to discuss their assumptions or untoward needs and nurses learn to understand and reflect on those experiences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

van hecke a., goeman c., beeckman d., heinen m. & defloor t. (2011) Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess venous leg ulcer lifestyle knowledge among nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 67(12), 2574-2585. Abstract Aim. Development and psychometric testing of an instrument to assess venous leg ulcer lifestyle knowledge. Background. Nurses often lack knowledge to provide adequate leg ulcer advice. No valid and reliable instruments are available to assess knowledge on venous leg ulcer advice among nurses. Methods. The instrument was developed based on a literature review and patient cases. Content validity was evaluated in a Delphi procedure by nine leg ulcer experts. Item-analysis, construct validity and stability were assessed. A sample of 350 nurses and student nurses participated. Data collection took place between February and April 2009. Results. The instrument included four topics: (1) Compression therapy, (2) Physical activity/leg exercises, (3) Leg elevation and (4) Pain management. Multiple-choice questions were developed to assess factual knowledge. Patient cases were developed to assess more complex cognitive skills. Content validity was established. The quality of the response alternatives varied between 0·01 and 0·68. The difficulty index for questions evaluating factual knowledge ranged from 0·12 to 0·78. Patient cases' questions had a difficulty index between 0·07 and 0·60. The score of participants with (theoretically expected) more expertise was significantly higher than the score of participants with (theoretically expected) less expertise. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0·71 and 0·77. Eleven questions had moderate kappa-values (0·41-0·60), and in eight questions, there was fair agreement (0·30-0·40). Conclusion. An instrument with an acceptable content validity and construct validity was developed. The instrument can be applied in nursing education, nursing practice and nursing research to evaluate venous leg ulcer advice knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]