Search

The objective of our work was to assess the accuracy in terms of spatial and contrast resolution, respiratory movement artifacts and synchronization of the “triple arterial phase” (TAP) sequence and compare it with the conventionally acquired arterial phase (AP). Between June 2021 and September 2021 16 patients underwent liver MRI for characterization and/or follow-up of focal hepatic lesions, and the TAP sequence was used. With the aim to obtain a TAP sequence we applied the KEYHOLE technique (modified to 35%) and the CENTRA-Keyhole method (Contrast Enhanced Timing Robust Angiography) for the K-space sampling, to the basic e-THRIVE sequence. 6/16 patients had previous MRI examinations performed with the classic single AP. Five radiologists experienced in the interpretation of liver imaging independently examined MRI studies. They were asked to provide their opinion, by using a qualitative evaluation scale, on spatial resolution, contrast/noise ratio (CNR), presence of breath-hold artifacts, synchronization of the TAP and its quality and usefulness for the characterization of liver lesions. The same questions were used for the evaluation of the 6/16 previous MRI examinations acquired with the conventional AP. For all readers, with TAP, the synchronization of the arterial study, the spatial resolution, the evaluation of artifacts from incorrect breath-hold were deemed good or excellent. The contrast resolution in the TAP was excellent for almost all cases. TAP was overall judged superior to AP. These preliminary results obtained are promising and require confirmation on a larger sample study to assess the diagnostic benefit of the TAP.