1. Clinical observation of Zhen’ai needling method in Nei Jing (Classic of Internal Medicine) for children with allergic rhinitis accompanied by adenoid hypertrophy
- Author
-
Jie Liu, Cui-hong Zhang, Chen Xie, Jue Hong, Yan-ting Yang, Zhan-wen Liu, Xiao-peng Ma, and Ling-xiang Wu
- Subjects
Dry needling ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Significant difference ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,02 engineering and technology ,Zusanli ,medicine.disease ,030205 complementary & alternative medicine ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Complementary and alternative medicine ,Internal medicine ,021105 building & construction ,Acupuncture ,Medicine ,Clinical efficacy ,business ,Adenoid hypertrophy ,After treatment ,Symptom score - Abstract
To observe the clinical efficacy of Zhen’ai needling method in Nei Jing (Classic of Internal Medicine) for children with allergic rhinitis (AR) accompanied by adenoid hypertrophy (AH). A total of 74 children who met the screening criteria were divided into a Zhen’ai group and a control group by the random number table method, with 37 cases in each group. The control group was treated with acupuncture at Zusanli (ST 36), Hegu (LI 4), Yingxiang (LI 20), Juliao (ST 3), Yintang (GV 29), Shangxing (GV 23) and Baihui (GV 20). The Zhen’ai group added points of Zhen’ai needling method {Shanglianquan [Extra, located at 1 cun above Lianquan (CV 23)], Tianrong (SI 17) and Lieque (LU 7)} in addition to the points in the control group. The needles were retained for 30 min. The treatment was performed twice a week. The total nasal symptom score (TNSS), sino-nasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20) and symptom scale for AH (SSAH) were assessed before and after 10 treatments. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared after treatment. During the treatment, 5 cases dropped out in the control group and 2 cases in the Zhen’ai group. After treatment, the total effective rate of the Zhen’ai group was 94.3%, versus 93.8% in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The markedly effective rate of the Zhen’ai group was 42.9%, versus 12.5% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P
- Published
- 2020