1. Whistleblowers and Outcomes of Financial Misrepresentation Enforcement Actions
- Author
-
Andrew C. Call, Jaron H. Wilde, Nathan Y. Sharp, and Gerald S. Martin
- Subjects
Finance ,Economics and Econometrics ,Government ,050208 finance ,Resource (biology) ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,05 social sciences ,Prison ,050201 accounting ,Misrepresentation ,Accounting ,0502 economics and business ,business ,Enforcement ,media_common - Abstract
Whistleblowers are ostensibly a valuable resource to regulators investigating securities violations, but whether there is a link between whistleblower involvement and the outcomes of enforcement actions is unclear. Using a dataset of employee whistleblowing allegations obtained from the U.S. government and the universe of enforcement actions for financial misrepresentation, we find that whistleblower involvement is associated with higher monetary penalties for targeted firms and employees and with longer prison sentences for culpable executives. We also find that regulators more quickly begin enforcement proceedings when whistleblowers are involved. Our findings suggest whistleblowers are a valuable source of information for regulators who investigate and prosecute financial misrepresentation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF