Search

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab has demonstrated greater antitumor activity versus ipilimumab alone, without additional toxicity, in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized phase II study. These data provide the longest efficacy and safety follow-up for patients with melanoma treated with a combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor.Eligible patients with unresectable stage IIIB‒IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive T-VEC plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. T-VEC was administered intralesionally at 106plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL in week 1, followed by 108PFU/mL in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter. Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ≤4 doses) was administered intravenously starting at week 1 in the ipilimumab arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per immune-related response criteria; key secondary end points included durable response rate (DRR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.Overall, 198 patients were randomized to receive the combination (n=98) or ipilimumab (n=100). The combination improved the ORR versus ipilimumab (35.7% vs 16.0%; OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.5 to 5.7; p=0.003). DRR was 33.7% and 13.0% (unadjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0; descriptive p=0.001), respectively. Among the objective responders, the median DOR was 69.2 months (95% CI 38.5 to not estimable) with the combination and was not reached with ipilimumab. Median PFS was 13.5 months with the combination and 6.4 months with ipilimumab (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.09; descriptive p=0.14). Estimated 5-year OS was 54.7% (95% CI 43.9 to 64.2) in the combination arm and 48.4% (95% CI 37.9 to 58.1) in the ipilimumab arm. Forty-seven (48.0%) and 65 (65.0%) patients in the combination and ipilimumab arms, respectively, received subsequent therapies. No new safety signals were reported.At the 5-year follow-up, the improved response rates observed with T-VEC plus ipilimumab were durable. This is the first randomized controlled study of the combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor that meets its primary end point.Trial registration number:NCT01740297.

Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are some of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies. In general, early-stage NMSCs have favorable outcomes; however, a small subset of patients develop resistant, advanced, or metastatic disease, or aggressive subtypes that are more challenging to treat successfully. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Although ICIs have demonstrated activity against NMSCs, the routine clinical use of these agents may be more challenging due to a number of factors including the lack of predictive biomarkers, the need to consider special patient populations, the management of toxicity, and the assessment of atypical responses. With the goal of improving patient care by providing expert guidance to the oncology community, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew on the published literature as well as their own clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for NMSCs, including staging, biomarker testing, patient selection, therapy selection, post-treatment response evaluation and surveillance, and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations, among others. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to provide guidance to cancer care professionals treating patients with NMSCs.

BackgroundWhile IL-2 and IL-15 signal through the shared IL-2/15 βγ receptor, IL-15 does not directly expand regulatory T cells (Tregs)or mediate activation-induced cell death and may have an improved therapeutic index. KD033 is a fusion antibody combining a fully human, high affinity anti-human Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) IgG1 antibody with the human IL-15 receptor alpha (IL15Rα) sushi domain and human IL-15 (IL-15). KD033 and its mouse cross-reactive surrogate molecule, srKD033, have been extensively characterized in multiple in vitro and in vivo nonclinical studies and have demonstrated robust efficacy and therapeutic benefits compared to IL-15 alone.MethodsThis is a phase 1, open-label, multiple ascending dose, multi-center clinical trial being conducted in patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors (NCT04242147). The primary objective is to determine the safety, tolerability, and MTD of KD033. Secondary objectives include characterization of PK and immunogenicity, evaluation of CD8+ T and NK cell activation, and assessment of best overall response and duration of response. KD033 is administered by IV infusion over 30 minutes every 14 days. The study design follows 3+3 escalation investigating dose ranges from 3µg/kg to 600µg/kg.ResultsA total of 12 patients have received treatment. Three patients were dosed in Cohort 1 (C1), four patients were dosed in Cohort 2 (C2), and three patients were dosed in Cohort 3 (C3). Two patients in Cohort 4 (C4) have been dosed. Through three dose escalation cohorts (3 µg/kg – 50 µg/kg), no dose-limiting toxicities have been reported. Grade 1–2 treatment-related toxicities resolved within 24 hours with supportive management. Grade 4 decreases in lymphocytes were noted the day after dosing in C3 and C4, which resolved on day 3 and were expected. One patient (adenoid cystic carcinoma) in C1 was shown to have stable disease for more than 6 months and one patient (metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma) in C3 was shown to have stable disease for more than 4 months.ConclusionsTo date, KD033 has been well tolerated in all subjects with on-mechanism pharmacodynamics consistent with IL-15 agonism.Ethics ApprovalThis study obtained ethics approval from WIRB.

BackgroundONCR-177 is a recombinant oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) that retains γ34.5 and is engineered to express five immunomodulatory transgenes (IL-12, FLT3LG ECD, CCL4 and anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies) for the intratumoral treatment of solid tumors. Attenuation by miRNA leads to selective replication in tumor cells, and mutations in UL37 act as an orthogonal safety strategy. Transgenes elicit potent systemic stimulation of anti-tumor immunity.1 ONCR-177 is being tested in an open-label, multicenter, phase 1 study alone and in combination with pembrolizumab (NCT04348916), for surface lesion injection and intrahepatic injection. Here we present the surface lesion escalation data.MethodsThe objectives were determination of safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ONCR-177 monotherapy in subjects with advanced and/or refractory injectable surface lesions using a modified toxicity probability interval-2 (mTPI-2) escalation design at four dose levels: (Cohort 1: 1×106 PFU in 1 mL, Cohort 2: 1×107 PFU in 1 mL, Cohort 3: 1×108 PFU in 1 mL and Cohort 4: 4×108 PFU in 4 mL). Subjects received ONCR-177 by intratumoral injection once every 2 weeks (up to 10 times) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. There was no intrapatient dose escalation.ResultsAs of June 28, 2021, 14 subjects with injectable tumors were enrolled in the dose escalation phase (3 in cohort 1, 4 in cohort 2, 3 in cohort 3 and 4 in cohort 4). Enrolled tumor types included: melanoma (3), breast (3), anal squamous cell (1), lung (1), duodenal (1), basal cell (1), chondrosarcoma (1), thyroid (1), oropharyngeal (1) and papillary renal cell (1). Subject median age was 67 years. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range 2–11), including 11 of 14 subjects with prior immunotherapy. Nine subjects were HSV-1 seropositive at baseline, 4 were negative, one was unknown. Treatment-related Adverse Events were all Grade 1–2. Most commonly reported were: cytokine release syndrome (2 occurrences in Cohort 4), fatigue, nausea, chills, headache, decreased appetite, hypotension, and injection site pain. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The RP2D was selected as 4×108 PFU in 4 mL every 2 weeks up to 10 doses. Clinical data, including safety, viral shedding and exploratory biomarker data including peripheral payloads, peripheral cytokines and immune infiltration and PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment will be presented.ConclusionsONCR-177 monotherapy in heavily pretreated subjects with advanced, injectable, solid tumors at the RP2D was safe and tolerable. Enrollment at the RP2D is underway in monotherapy expansion.Trial RegistrationNCT04348916ReferencesHaines BB, Denslow A, Grzesik P, Lee JS, Farkaly T, Hewett J, Wambua D, Kong L, Behera P, Jacques J, et al. ONCR-177, an Oncolytic HSV-1 Designed to Potently Activate Systemic Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Immunol Res 2021;9: 291–308Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the following institutional Ethics Boards:-University Health Network Research Ethics Board (ID Number: 20-5069)-Integreview IRB (ID Number RM 694) -WCG IRB (ID Number: 20200150)-Advarra (ID Number: 00000971)-Roswell Park IRB (ID Number: STUDY00001189/P-553719)-The Ohio State University Cancer IRB (ID Number: 2020C0139) -Dana Farber Cancer Institute IRB (ID Number 354020)All participants gave informed consent before taking part in this clinical trial.

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have emerged as a front-line therapy for a variety of solid tumors. With the widespread use of these agents, immune-associated toxicities are increasingly being recognized, including fatal myocarditis. There are limited data on the outcomes and prognostic utility of biomarkers associated with ICI-associated myocarditis. Our objective was to examine the associations between clinical biomarkers of cardiomyocyte damage and mortality in patients with cancer treated with ICIs.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 23 patients who developed symptomatic and asymptomatic troponin elevations while receiving ICI therapy at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. We obtained serial ECGs, troponin I, and creatine kinase-MD (CK-MB), in addition to other conventional clinical biomarkers, and compared covariates between survivors and non-survivors.ResultsAmong patients with myocarditis, higher troponin I (p=0.037) and CK-MB (p=0.034) levels on presentation correlated with progression to severe myocarditis. Higher troponin I (p=0.016), CK (p=0.013), and CK-MB (p=0.034) levels were associated with increased mortality, while the presence of advanced atrioventricular block on presentation (p=0.088) trended toward increased mortality. Weekly troponin monitoring lead to earlier hospitalization for potential myocarditis (p=0.022) and was associated with decreased time to steroid initiation (p=0.053) and improved outcomes.ConclusionsRoutine troponin surveillance may be helpful in predicting mortality in ICI-treated patients with cancer in the early phase of ICI therapy initiation. Early detection of troponin elevation is associated with earlier intervention and improved outcomes in ICI-associated myocarditis. The recommended assessment and diagnostic studies guiding treatment decisions are presented.

Immunotherapy represents the third important wave in the history of the systemic treatment of cancer after chemotherapy and targeted therapy and is now established as a potent and effective treatment option across several cancer types. The clinical success of anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4, first, and anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 agents in melanoma and other cancers a few years later, has encouraged increasing focus on the development of other immunotherapies (e.g. monoclonal antibodies with other immune targets, adoptive cell transfer, and vaccines), with over 3000 immuno-oncology trials ongoing, involving hundreds of research institutes across the globe. The potential use of these different immunotherapeutic options in various combinations with one another and with other treatment modalities is an area of particular promise. The third Immunotherapy Bridge meeting (29-30 November, 2017, Naples, Italy) focused on recent advances in immunotherapy across various cancer types and is summarised in this report.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

BackgroundUveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults. In contrast to cutaneous melanoma (CM), there is no standard therapy, and the efficacy and safety of dual checkpoint blockade with nivolumab and ipilimumab is not well defined.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic UM (mUM) who received treatment with ipilimumab plus nivolumab across 14 academic medical centers. Toxicity was graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5.0. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.Results89 eligible patients were identified. 45% had received prior therapy, which included liver directed therapy (29%), immunotherapy (21%), targeted therapy (10%) and radiation (16%). Patients received a median 3 cycles of ipilimumab plus nivolumab. The median follow-up time was 9.2 months. Overall response rate was 11.6%. One patient achieved complete response (1%), 9 patients had partial response (10%), 21 patients had stable disease (24%) and 55 patients had progressive disease (62%). Median OS from treatment initiation was 15 months and median PFS was 2.7 months. Overall, 82 (92%) of patients discontinued treatment, 34 due to toxicity and 27 due to progressive disease. Common immune-related adverse events were colitis/diarrhea (32%), fatigue (23%), rash (21%) and transaminitis (21%).ConclusionsDual checkpoint inhibition yielded higher response rates than previous reports of single-agent immunotherapy in patients with mUM, but the efficacy is lower than in metastatic CM. The median OS of 15 months suggests that the rate of clinical benefit may be larger than the modest response rate.

Patients with cancer who developed severe, grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are at risk for developing severe toxicities again on rechallenge with checkpoint inhibitors. Consequently, medical oncologists and multidisciplinary teams are hesitant to retreat in this scenario, despite the fact that a number of patients may derive clinical benefit from this approach. Balancing such clinical benefit and treatment-related toxicities for each patient is becoming increasingly challenging as more and more patients with cancer are being treated with checkpoint inhibitors. In this manuscript, we provide an extensive overview of the relevant literature on retreatment after toxicity, and suggest prophylactic approaches to minimize the risk of severe irAE following rechallenge with immune checkpoint blockade, since treatment may be lifesaving in a number of occasions.

BackgroundMupadolimab (mupa) is a humanized FcγR binding-deficient IgG1 anti-CD73 antibody that has agonistic properties.1 CD73 is involved in production of adenosine and in cellular trafficking. Mupa reacts with the majority of circulating B cells leading to activation and expression of differentiation markers CD69, CD138 and CD38, and transformation into plasmablasts with secretion of IgM and IgG. B cell activation provided the rationale to develop mupa for immunotherapy of cancer and Covid-19. Intratumor HPV specific B cells have been reported in HNSCC.2 This report describes properties of mupa and the early signs of clinical activity in HPV+ HNSCC.MethodsELISA and flow cytometry were used to measure binding of anti-CD73. Humanized NSG-SGM3 mice were used to evaluate effects of Mupa on human anti-SARS CoV2 spike protein (SP) response. CD73 expression in biopsies was measured by immunohistochemistry. Mupa (IV q 3 weeks) with or without pembrolizumab is being evaluated in an ongoing phase 1 trial in patients with refractory cancers.ResultsMupa binding to CD73 was blocked by APCP, an analog of adenosine diphosphate that locks CD73 in the closed conformation, indicating mupa binding to the open conformation. Cross blocking and cellular internalization studies showed that mupa is distinct from other anti-CD73 antibodies such as MEDI9447 and AD2. NSG-SGM3 mice were immunized with 50 µg SP subcutaneously and treated with mupa 10mg/kg or control IgG IP. Mupa treated animals mounted an antigen specific human anti-SP response; no antibody responses were seen in controls (P=0.02). In the dose-escalation portion of the phase 1 trial, mupa doses of ≥12 mg/kg saturated CD73 sites on circulating B cells. High stromal CD73 expression was observed in HPV+ HNSCC biopsies from 5 evaluable patients with chemotherapy and anti-PD1 refractory disease, and tumor regression was seen in 2 of these patients receiving 7 and 16 cycles of ≥12 mg/kg mupa without pembrolizumab. Safety of mupa+pembrolizumab was evaluated in 16 patients with no MTD reached and no changes in serum immunoglobulins. Transient reductions in circulating CD73 B cells were observed consistent with redistribution to lymphoid tissues.ConclusionsCD73 plays a role in B cell activation and differentiation. Mupa is an antibody with agonistic activity that stimulates B cells and enhances antigen specific antibody production. This activity supports a strategy to combine mupa with pembrolizumab to enhance both humoral and cellular immunity in the treatment of viral associated cancers such as HPV+HNSCC, and viral infections.Trial RegistrationNCT03454451ReferencesWillingham S, Criner G, Hill C, Hu S, Rudnick J, Daine-Matsuoka B, Hsieh J, Mashhedi H, Hotson A, Brody J, Marron T, Piccione E, Buggy J, Mahabhashyam S, Jones W, Mobasher M, Miller R. Characterization and Phase 1 trial of a B cell activating anti-CD73 antibody for the immunotherapy of COVID-19. medRxiv, 2020; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.10.20191486.Wieland A, Patel M, Cardenas M, Eberhardt C, Hudson W, Obeng R, Griffith C, Wang X, Chen Z, Kissick H, Saba N, Ahmed R. Defining HPV-specific B cell responses in patients with head and neck cancer. Nature 2020; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2931-3.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Western IRB, approval number 1-1066703-1. Participants gave informed consent before taking part.

BackgroundIntratumoral (IT) cancer therapies may enhance T cell activation and tumor infiltration when combined with systemic checkpoint blockade. This approach may improve treatment of advanced breast cancer, which is commonly resistant to immune therapy.MethodsA multicenter basket-style trial (NCT02643303) was performed in patients with advanced solid tumors, who received polyICLC IT 1mg x 6, then intramuscular (IM) x 3, combined with intravenous (IV) durvalumab 1500 mg q4W. Most were assigned to cohorts also receiving tremelimumab: 10 mg IT or 75 mg IV. Goals were to assess tolerability and clinical activity. Treated tumors were evaluated for immune infiltrates on days (d) 0, 15, and 29 by multiparameter immunofluorescence histology. A strong signal for clinical response was in breast cancer patients; thus, an expansion cohort was enrolled. We report analysis of that breast cancer subgroup.ResultsNineteen participants with treatment-refractory recurrent breast cancer with median 4 prior lines of therapy were enrolled and treated with IV durvalumab and IT/IM polyICLC. Seventeen also received tremelimumab (15 IT, 2 IV). Common treatment-related AEs were fatigue, injection site pain, and chills. There was one dose-limiting toxicity in a participant who received tremelimumab IV, and died with severe hyponatremia (DLT) and progressive disease. Objective clinical responses (1 complete; 4 partial (1 unconfirmed)) were observed in 5 (26%), including 2/9 patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and 3/10 with non-TNBC. Median OS was longer for those with CR, PR, or SD (not reached) vs. those with PD or not evaluable (5 months): two responders remain alive at 34+ and 40+ months. In injected tumors, there were significant increases from d0 to d29 in numbers/mm2 of CD8+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, mature dendritic cells (DC), macrophages, and CD56+ NK cells, and in CD8+ cells with antigen-experience (CD45RO), cytotoxic function (granzyme B), activation (ICOS1), or proliferation (Ki67). CD8+ cells expressing LAG3 and TIM3 increased, as did PDL1+ tumor cells and stromal cells. There were no differences in cells expressing IDO, ARG1, CD39, or CD73. Among patients with objective response, vs. all others, proportions of intratumoral CD8+ cells expressing Ki67 increased (p < 0.04).ConclusionsIT tremelimumab and polyICLC plus systemic durvalumab is safe and has clinical activity in patients with advanced TNBC and non-TNBC. The therapy enhances intratumoral immune effectors and markers of T cell function in hypothesis-generating data that warrant confirmatory studies. Clinical response was associated with longer survival and increased CD8 T cell proliferation.Trial RegistrationNCT02643303Ethics ApprovalThe study has been performed with approval of the institutional review boards of each participating institution (Roswell Park Cancer Institute: STUDY 00000121/I291016; Mount Sinai School of Medicine: IRB-17-01692; University of Virginia: IRB # 19276; Cleveland Clinic: 18-694; Toledo: 300176; Dartmouth: STUDY00031630; Emory: IRB00099445). All participants give informed consent before enrolling and participating. The study was also performed with approval from the FDA

The clinical and immunologic implications of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for patients with cancer receiving systemic anticancer therapy have introduced a multitude of clinical challenges and academic controversies. This review summarizes the current evidence, discussion points, and recommendations regarding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with a focus on patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). More specifically, we summarize the theoretical concepts and available objective data regarding the relationships between ICIs and the antiviral immune response, along with recommended clinical approaches to the management of melanoma and RCC patient cohorts receiving ICIs throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional insights regarding the use of ICIs in the setting of current and upcoming COVID-19 vaccines and broader implications toward future pandemics are also discussed.

As part of the 2018 Immunotherapy Bridge congress (November 28–29, Naples, Italy), the Great Debate session featured counterpoint views from leading experts on four topical clinical issues in immunotherapy today. These were: the relative importance of adaptive versus innate immunity in the anti-cancer immune response; the merits of combination versus sequential immunotherapy regimens in the treatment of cancer; the advantages and disadvantages of murine models of cancer versus humans in order to evaluate immunotherapy; and whether or not mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy differ between different cancers. Discussion of these important topics are summarised in this report.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including antibodies against programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), are being used with increasing frequency for the treatment of cancer. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including colitis, dermatitis, and pneumonitis are well described, but less frequent events are now emerging with larger numbers of patients treated. Herein we describe the incidence and spectrum of thrombocytopenia following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and two severe cases of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Case presentations A 47-year-old female with recurrent BRAF mutant positive melanoma received combination anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4. Two weeks later, she presented with mucosal bleeding, petechiae, and thrombocytopenia and was treated with standard therapy for ITP with steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Her diagnosis was confirmed with bone marrow biopsy, and given the lack of treatment response, she was treated with rituximab. She began to have recovery and stabilization of her platelet count that ultimately allowed her to be retreated with PD-1 inhibition with no further thrombocytopenia. A second patient, a 45-year-old female with a BRAF wild-type melanoma, received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and became thrombocytopenic 43 days later. Three weeks of steroid treatment improved her platelet count, but thrombocytopenia recurred and required additional steroids. She later received anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy and developed severe ITP with intracranial hemorrhage. Her ITP resolved after treatment of prednisone, IVIG, and rituximab and discontinuation of checkpoint inhibition. In a retrospective chart review of 2360 patients with melanoma treated with checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Background Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare kidney tumor that occurs in adolescent and young adults, typically in association with sickle cell trait. RMC exhibits rapid disease progression, frequent metastases at diagnosis, and dismal clinical outcomes. Currently available therapies, including cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, multi-tyrosine kinase, and mTOR inhibitor strategies demonstrate either transient responses or minimal activity. Therefore, further molecular characterization and additional treatment strategies are urgently needed in this aggressive disease. The role of immune system surveillance and responsiveness to anti-PD-1 therapies in RMC are completely unexplored. Case presentation A 29 year old male with sickle cell trait presented with painless hematuria that ultimately resulted in a diagnosis of RMC. He underwent total nephrectomy and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy with carboplatin, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. As is common in this aggressive form of kidney cancer he recurred with biopsy proven lymph node metastasis. He was started on checkpoint inhibitor therapy with nivolumab that inhibits program cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and on his first follow-up imaging he was found to have a partial response that on subsequent scans ultimately resulted in a complete response lasting greater than nine months. In this report, we present a patient with metastatic RMC who exhibited a clinical response to nivolumab, as well as the genetic and immunologic correlates of the pre-treatment tumor. Provocatively, robust immune infiltrate and expression of immune checkpoints were observed, despite the presence of a low mutation burden. Conclusions Here, we report the first case of immune microenvironment profiling and response to anti-PD-1 in a patient with RMC to our knowledge. This case suggests that anti-PD-1 based therapies may have clinical activity in RMC.

O1 Combinatorial CD8+ and PD-L1+ cell densities correlate with response and improved survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with durvalumab #### Sonja Althammer1, Keith Steele2, Marlon Rebelatto2, Tze Heng Tan1, Tobias Wiestler1, Guenter Schmidt1, Brandon Higgs2, Xia

Background Anti-PD-1 therapy is increasingly used in various advanced malignancies. Patients with baseline organ dysfunction are largely excluded from clinical trials. Therefore it is unclear whether anti-PD-1 therapy is safe or effective in this setting. Further, these patients are often not candidates for other anti-cancer therapies, highlighting their need for active treatment options. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients from multiple centers with advanced solid tumors and baseline organ dysfunction who received anti-PD-1 therapy. Organ dysfunction was defined as cardiac (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45 %), renal (creatinine ≥2 mg/dL or GFR ≤30 ml/min) or hepatic dysfunction (evidence of cirrhosis on imaging or AST, ALT or bilirubin ≥3x ULN). We assessed change in organ dysfunction, immune related adverse events (irAEs), response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results We identified 27 patients eligible for inclusion with the following diseases: renal cell carcinoma (n = 8), melanoma (10), non-small cell lung cancer (3), small cell lung cancer (2) and urothelial bladder cancer (4). Baseline organ dysfunction included renal dysfunction (n = 17), hepatic dysfunction (7), cardiac dysfunction (11), including >1 organ dysfunction (8). Worsening organ dysfunction requiring hospitalization or dose delays occurred in 8 patients (30 %) although in most cases this was thought not-drug related and resolved with supportive care. Grade 3 irAEs occurred in 2 pts (7 %; hepatitis and colitis). Thirteen of 27 patients had ongoing treatment benefit (objective response or stable disease) at data collection (48 %). Eleven patients had primary progressive disease (41 %), 11 had stable disease (41 %), 4 had partial responses (15 %), and one had a complete response (4 %). Overall, median PFS was 168 days. Median OS was not reached. Conclusions In our experience, anti-PD-1 agents in this group of patients with cardiac, hepatic or renal dysfunction were associated with tolerable irAEs and infrequent manageable worsening of organ dysfunction. Further, objective responses and prolonged PFS were observed in a number of patients. Thus, patients with baseline organ dysfunction may be considered for anti-PD-1 therapy with appropriate clinical monitoring.

Meeting abstracts T-VEC is a herpes simplex virus-1-based oncolytic immunotherapy designed to selectively replicate in tumors, produce GM-CSF, and stimulate antitumor immune responses. OPTiM, a Phase III trial of T-VEC vs GM-CSF in unresectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma, improved the primary endpoint

Meeting abstracts T-VEC is an oncolytic immunotherapy derived from herpes simplex virus type-1 designed to selectively replicate within tumors and to produce GM-CSF to enhance systemic antitumor immune responses. OPTiM, a randomized Phase III trial of T-VEC vs GM-CSF in patients with unresected

Background Despite the positive impact of targeted therapies on metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), durable responses are infrequent and an unmet need exists for novel therapies with distinct mechanisms of action. We investigated the combination of recombinant Interleukin 21 (IL-21), a cytokine with unique immunostimulatory properties, plus sorafenib, a VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Methods In this phase 1/2 study, 52 mRCC patients received outpatient treatment with oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily plus intravenous IL-21 (10–50 mcg/kg) on days 1–5 and 15–19 of each 7-week treatment course. The safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the combination were evaluated. Results In phase 1 (n = 19), the maximum tolerated dose for IL-21 with the standard dose of sorafenib was determined to be 30 mcg/kg/day; grade 3 skin rash was the only dose-limiting toxicity. In phase 2, 33 previously-treated patients tolerated the combination therapy well with appropriate dose reductions; toxicities were mostly grade 1 or 2. The objective response rate was 21% and disease control rate was 82%. Two patients have durable responses that are ongoing, despite cessation of both IL-21 and sorafenib, at 41+ and 30+ months, respectively. The median progression-free survival in phase 2 was 5.6 months. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of IL-21 appeared to be preserved in the presence of sorafenib. Conclusion IL-21 plus sorafenib has antitumor activity and acceptable safety in previously treated mRCC patients. IL-21 may represent a suitable immunotherapy in further exploration of combination strategies in mRCC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00389285

Meeting abstracts T-VEC is a herpes simplex virus type-1-derived oncolytic immunotherapy designed to produce GM-CSF and to selectively replicate in and lyse tumors to induce a systemic anti-tumor immune response. A phase 3 study of T-VEC in Stage IIIB-IV melanoma demonstrated a significant