Search

Materno-fetal platelet allo-immunization causes fetal or neonatal thrombocytopenia and sometimes severe intracerebral bleeding. The HPA-1s antigen is most generally implicated. This accident can occur during the first pregnancy with a major risk of severe recurrence during the next pregnancy. These women require specific care in a specialized center although no consensus has been reached on management of second pregnancies. Proposed treatments include immunoglobulins and/or corticosteroids, fetal blood puncture and unique or iterative platelet transfusions.

Use of serum markers alone for trisomy 21 screening programs leads to a high rate of amniocentesis. Adding a second parameter (ultrasonography during the second trimester) might reduce this rate yet retain satisfactory sensitivity. This work was conducted to evaluate the pertinence of associating serum hCG level between 16 and 17 weeks gestation and morphological ultrasonography between 18 ans 20 weeks gestation.A prospective study was conducted in 5,163 pregnant women aged over 38 years. A morphological ultrasonography was performed in all patients whose hCG level1/150 indicated a risk. An amniocentesis was proposed if an anomaly was detected at ultrasonography.Serum hCG was above the risk threshold retained in 11.9% of the patients and among these patients at least one anomaly was detected at ultrasonography in 12%. An amniocentesis was performed in 1.4% of all patients. The positive predictive value of the screening test was 20%.Combining a serum marker and ultrasonography during the second trimester allows a reduction in the rate of amniocentesis compared with screening with serum markers alone. Sensitivity for detecting trisomy 21 remains satisfactory.

We present a case of maternal and fetal virilization caused by an androgen-secreting ovarian tumor. Biopsy at caesarean section was required to determine the etiology (Krukenberg tumor) and orient diagnosis to a primary cancer (gastric adenocarcinoma).

The psychological effect of reducing the number of embryons was studied prospectively in two Paris hospitals. All women who had multifetal pregnancy reduction (n = 18) were contacted for interviews just after the operation, during pregnancy, and four months after delivery. The decision to reduce the number of embryons was painful and led to a guilty feeling. After operation, nearly one-half of the women suffered psychologically. To justify their decision, and contain their emotions, the women spoke of the problems related to having triplets and, most importantly, the medical arguements explained by the physician. Medical counselling is thus essential to help this couples at the time of the operation. The pregnancy period is almost always a period of calm for these women. Nevertheless, four months after delivery, 5 women expressed a psychological malaise related to the reduction, and 2 women refused to continue the study because they did not want to revive their suffering. This study shows that psychological problems are of major importance after multifetal pregnancy reduction and can occur several months after delivery. These negative conclusions should however be examined in light of the consequences if reduction had not been performed.

Having carried out four cases of vaginal caesarean section the authors describe the technique they used. The advantages of the operation are: it is simple and can be carried out quickly, future obstetric behaviour is not compromised. It is important to avoid two complications of the operation: haemorrhage and injury to the bladder. These are reduced if the vertical incision in the cervix is made in the midline and long enough. The ideal indications for the operation are absence of cervical dilatation, or the occurrence of severe maternal haemorrhage during the operation to terminate a pregnancy, or while the uterine contents are being expelled towards the end of the second trimester. It is disputable whether there is a place for vaginal caesarean operation when the fetus is alive, in view of the recent studies on fetal prognosis.

The place of laparoscopic surgery continues to increase in the field of surgery in our specialty. Although the advantages would seem to be obvious, it seemed to us interesting to quantify, if possible, the parameters of operative stress and compare laparoscopic surgery with conventional surgery. Markers studied are Prolactin, Cortisol, Adrenaline, Nor-Adrenaline, Dopamine and the Beta-Endorphins. The only marker that shows any difference in the two procedures in our study is Beta-Endorphin which is significantly less raised in laparoscopic surgery directly after the operation (p less than 0.01). This was very specific for pain, which is one of the benefits of this technique and shown in this parameter which confirms the clinical impression. The curves of the changes in the different markers have been analysed and discussed.

The authors used epidural anaesthesia to carry out laparoscopy in 220 patients. The chief indications for the laparoscopies were GIFT (intratubal transfer of gametes) and tubal sterilization. The technique used was slightly different according to the indications for the use but they had to be sure of anaesthetising up to T4. In 90% of cases the patients tolerated the procedure well. No change in ventilation or in metabolic measurements. As far as fertilization was concerned studies carried out in various parameters failed to show any untoward side effects due to the use of local anaesthetics. Finally so long as the anaesthesia is only used for a short length of time this technique seems to be suitable for day cases.

This is a retrospective study of IVF cycles with failure of cleavage at the PMA centre of the University Hospital, Pitie-Salpetriere occurring between May 1985 and December 1988. Failures of cleavage occurred in 23% of the cycles where at least one oocyte was recovered (170 out of 729 cycles). There were three groups of conditions which were analysed: 1. The male factor which was known about before the attempt at IVF (38 cycles - 23% of failures of cleavage). 2. No previously known male factors (126 cycles-74% of failures of cleavage). 3. IVF with frozen donor sperm (6 cycles-3% of failures of cleavage). These couples had a total of 340 cycles with 25 pregnancies. The prognosis differs according to the category mentioned above. If there is a male factor, one attempt at IVF with this partner's sperm seems absolutely justified before proceeding to IVF with donor sperm or to AID. If there is no male factor the oestradiol curve does not make it possible to foresee a failure of cleavage and it is necessary to carry out a second IVF cycle to handle these couples.