Search

Showing total 230 results
Start Over Publication Year Range Last 10 years Language english Journal jona: the journal of nursing administration
230 results

10. Reducing the Innovation Knowledge Gap by Developing Innovativeness Across Academia and Practice for Healthcare Progress Scale.

Author

Joseph, M. Lindell

Subjects
*DIFFUSION of innovations, *INTERPROFESSIONAL relations, *SCHOLARLY method, *SCHOLARSHIPS, *MEDICAL care, *PATIENT care, *PROFESSIONS, *NURSING practice
Abstract

The article highlights several medical research papers focused on developing innovativeness in healthcare. Topics include a theoretical framework for healthcare innovation, types of innovations in nursing, and methods to teach and promote innovation across academia and practice. It also culminated in the creation and validation of the Innovativeness Across Academia and Practice for Healthcare Progress Scale (IA-APHPS), aimed at reducing the innovation knowledge gap.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Development and Testing of the Relational and Structural Components of Innovativeness Across Academia and Practice for Healthcare Progress Scale.

Author

Joseph, M. Lindell, Williams, Michele, Reinke, Karl, Bair, Heather, Chae, Sena, Hanrahan, Kirsten, St. Marie, Barbara, Jenkins, Peggy, Albert, Nancy M., Gullatte, Mary M., Rogers, Darlene M., Swan, Beth Ann, Holden, Tina, Woods, Elizabeth, DeGuzman, Pamela B., DeGennaro, Gina, Marshall, David, Hein, Maria, Perkhounkova, Yelena, and Huber, Diane L.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Factors Associated With Job Satisfaction in Medical Oncology Practices: Results From a Multisite Survey.

Author

Friese, Christopher R., Mendelsohn-Victor, Kari, Medvec, Barbara R., Ghosh, Bidisha, Bedard, Louise, Griggs, Jennifer J., and Manojlovich, Milisa

Subjects
*PROFESSIONAL practice, *STATISTICS, *OUTPATIENT medical care, *CONFIDENCE intervals, *ATTITUDE (Psychology), *RESEARCH methodology, *MEDICAL personnel, *REGRESSION analysis, *T-test (Statistics), *JOB satisfaction, *HOSPITAL nursing staff, *COMMUNICATION, *INTERPROFESSIONAL relations, *DESCRIPTIVE statistics, *QUESTIONNAIRES, *PHYSICIANS, *ONCOLOGY, *PATIENT safety, RESEARCH evaluation
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the factors influencing job satisfaction of nurses, physicians, and advanced practice providers in ambulatory oncology settings. BACKGROUND: Job satisfaction is essential to clinician well-being and quality of care. METHODS: In 2017, clinicians from 29 ambulatory medical oncology practices completed anonymous paper questionnaires that examined job satisfaction, clinician-to-clinician communication, and perceptions of patient safety. Linear regression, adjusted for clustered observations, examined the relationship between job satisfaction, clinician communication, and patient safety perceptions. RESULTS: Of 280 respondents (response rate of 68%), 85% reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with their current position. Patient safety and accuracy of clinician communication were positively and significantly associated with job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Although most surveyed clinicians were satisfied, 15% were dissatisfied and reported communication and safety concerns. Leadership efforts to strengthen clinician communication actions and develop positive safety cultures are promising strategies to promote clinician well-being and high-quality cancer care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. Nurse Outcomes in Magnet® and Non-Magnet Hospitals.

Author

Kelly, Lesly A., McHugh, Matthew D., and Aiken, Linda H.

Subjects
*PSYCHOLOGICAL burnout prevention, *NURSING audit, *CHI-squared test, *CLINICAL competence, *COMPARATIVE studies, *HOSPITALS, *WORKING hours, *JOB satisfaction, *EVALUATION of medical care, *NURSES, *QUESTIONNAIRES, *RESEARCH funding, *STATISTICAL sampling, *SURVEYS, *T-test (Statistics), *WORK environment, *LOGISTIC regression analysis, *SECONDARY analysis, *EDUCATIONAL attainment, *CROSS-sectional method, *DATA analysis software, *HOSPITAL nursing staff
Abstract

The important goals of Magnet® hospitals are to create supportive professional nursing care environments. A recently published paper found little difference in work environments between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether work environments, staffing, and nurse outcomes differ between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. A secondary analysis of data from a 4-state survey of 26,276 nurses in 567 acute care hospitals to evaluate differences in work environments and nurse outcomes in Magnet and non- Magnet hospitals was conducted. Magnet hospitals had significantly better work environments (t = -5.29, P < .001) and more highly educated nurses (t = -2.27, P < .001). Magnet hospital nurses were 18% less likely to be dissatisfied with their job (P <.05) and 13% less likely to report high burnout (P < .05). Magnet hospitals have significantly better work environments than non-Magnet hospitals. The better work environments of Magnet hospitals are associated with lower levels of nurse job dissatisfaction and burnout. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF