Search

Background The Affordable Care Act (ACA) increased private nonemployer health insurance options, expanded Medicaid eligibility, and provided preexisting health condition protections. We evaluated insurance coverage among long-term adult survivors of childhood cancer pre- and post-ACA implementation. Methods Using the multicenter Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we included participants from 2 cross-sectional surveys: pre-ACA (2007-2009; survivors: n = 7505; siblings: n = 2175) and post-ACA (2017-2019; survivors: n = 4030; siblings: n = 987). A subset completed both surveys (1840 survivors; 646 siblings). Multivariable regression models compared post-ACA insurance coverage and type (private, public, uninsured) between survivors and siblings and identified associated demographic and clinical factors. Multinomial models compared gaining and losing insurance vs staying the same among survivors and siblings who participated in both surveys. Results The proportion with insurance was higher post-ACA (survivors pre-ACA 89.1% to post-ACA 92.0% [+2.9%]; siblings pre-ACA 90.9% to post-ACA 95.3% [+4.4%]). Post-ACA insurance increase in coverage was higher among those aged 18-25 years (survivors: +15.8% vs +2.3% or less ages 26 years and older; siblings +17.8% vs +4.2% or less ages 26 years and older). Survivors were more likely to have public insurance than siblings post-ACA (18.4% vs 6.9%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 2.6). Survivors with severe chronic conditions (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 3.0 to 7.3) and those living in Medicaid expansion states (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.7 to 3.4) had increased odds of public insurance coverage post-ACA. Among the subset completing both surveys, low- and mid-income survivors (<$40 000 and <$60 000, respectively) experienced insurance losses and gains in reference to highest household income survivors (≥$100 000), relative to odds of keeping the same insurance status. Conclusions Post-ACA, more childhood cancer survivors and siblings had health insurance, although disparities remain in coverage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Early efforts at risk-adapted therapy for neuroblastoma are predicted to result in differential late effects; the magnitude of these differences has not been well described. Methods Late mortality, subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs), and severe/life-threatening chronic health conditions (CHCs), graded according to CTCAE v4.03, were assessed among 5-year Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) survivors of neuroblastoma diagnosed 1987-1999. Using age, stage at diagnosis, and treatment, survivors were classified into risk groups (low [n = 425]; intermediate [n = 252]; high [n = 245]). Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of SMNs were compared with matched population controls. Cox regression models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for CHC compared with 1029 CCSS siblings. Results Among survivors (49.8% male; median age = 21 years, range = 7-42; median follow-up = 19.3 years, range = 5-29.9), 80% with low-risk disease were treated with surgery alone, whereas 79.1% with high-risk disease received surgery, radiation, chemotherapy ± autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). All-cause mortality was elevated across risk groups (SMRhigh = 27.7 [21.4-35.8]; SMRintermediate = 3.3 [1.7-6.5]; SMRlow = 2.8 [1.7-4.8]). SMN risk was increased among high- and intermediate-risk survivors (SIRhigh = 28.0 [18.5-42.3]; SIRintermediate = 3.7 [1.2-11.3]) but did not differ from the US population for survivors of low-risk disease. Compared with siblings, survivors had an increased risk of grade 3-5 CHCs, particularly among those with high-risk disease (HRhigh = 16.1 [11.2-23.2]; HRintermediate = 6.3 [3.8-10.5]; HRlow = 1.8 [1.1-3.1]). Conclusion Survivors of high-risk disease treated in the early days of risk stratification carry a markedly elevated burden of late recurrence, SMN, and organ-related multimorbidity, whereas survivors of low/intermediate-risk disease have a modest risk of late adverse outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A cancer diagnosis during adolescence or young adulthood can have a negative impact on long-term physical and mental health. However, little is known about the financial outcomes for survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancers. A recent study in the Netherlands found that AYA cancer survivors experienced an average decrease of 8.5% in their annual earnings and a decrease in employment levels after diagnosis compared to a control group. The study also highlighted the potential economic consequences for family members who provide informal care and the broader impact on household financial security. While these findings may not be directly applicable to countries like the United States, where access to healthcare and worker protections are different, it is likely that young adult cancer survivors in the US face greater economic challenges. The oncology community is working to identify interventions to reduce the financial burden on AYA cancer survivors, including assessing financial hardship throughout the cancer journey, implementing screening tools, providing financial navigators, and advocating for improved access to affordable cancer care and social safety nets. [Extracted from the article]

Background: The likelihood of pregnancy and risk of obstetrical or perinatal complications is inadequately documented in female survivors of pediatric cancer.Methods: We assembled a population-based cohort of female survivors of cancer diagnosed at age 21 years and younger in Ontario, Canada, between 1985 and 2012. Survivors were matched 1:5 to women without prior cancer. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and modified Poisson models assessed the likelihood of a recognized pregnancy and perinatal and maternal complications.Results: A total of 4062 survivors were matched to 20 308 comparisons. Median (interquartile range) age was 11 (4-15) years at cancer diagnosis and 25 (19-31) years at follow-up. By age 30 years, the cumulative incidence of achieving a recognized pregnancy was 22.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 20.7% to 23.9%) among survivors vs 26.6% (95% CI = 25.6% to 27.3%) among comparisons (hazard ratio = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.75 to 0.86). A lower likelihood of pregnancy was associated with a brain tumor, alkylator chemotherapy, cranial radiation, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Pregnant survivors were as likely as cancer-free women to carry a pregnancy >20 weeks (relative risk [RR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.04). Survivors had a higher relative risk of severe maternal morbidity (RR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.59 to 3.37), cardiac morbidity (RR = 4.18, 95% CI = 1.89 to 9.24), and preterm birth (RR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.92). Preterm birth was more likely in survivors treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allogenic: RR = 8.37, 95% CI = 4.83 to 14.48; autologous: RR = 3.72, 95% CI = 1.66 to 8.35).Conclusions: Survivors of childhood or adolescent cancer are less likely to achieve a pregnancy and, once pregnant, are at higher risk for severe maternal morbidity and preterm birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early initiation of breast cancer screening is recommended for high-risk women, including survivors of childhood cancer treated with chest radiation. Recent studies suggest that female survivors of childhood leukemia or sarcoma treated without chest radiation are also at elevated early onset breast cancer risk. However, the potential clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of early breast cancer screening among these women are uncertain.Methods: Using data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we adapted 2 Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network simulation models to reflect the elevated risks of breast cancer and competing mortality among leukemia and sarcoma survivors. Costs and utility weights were based on published studies and databases. Outcomes included breast cancer deaths averted, false-positive screening results, benign biopsies, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.Results: In the absence of screening, the lifetime risk of dying from breast cancer among survivors was 6.8% to 7.0% across models. Early initiation of annual mammography with breast magnetic resonance imaging screening between ages 25 and 40 years would avert 52.6% to 64.3% of breast cancer deaths. When costs and quality-of-life impacts were considered, screening starting at age 40 years was the only strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below the $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained cost-effectiveness threshold ($27 680 to $44 380 per QALY gained across models).Conclusions: Among survivors of childhood leukemia or sarcoma, early initiation of breast cancer screening at age 40 years may reduce breast cancer deaths by half and is cost-effective. These findings could help inform screening guidelines for survivors treated without chest radiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer treatment exposures and outcomes can often be identified in administrative claims and electronic health record data ([[6], [8]]). Limited availability of data to inform the generation of robust treatment-specific risk estimates for perinatal and maternal outcomes during cancer therapy has been a long-standing barrier to providing accurate risk counseling to inform decision making. [Extracted from the article]