Search

Background: Boundary violations have been discussed in the literature, but most studies report on physician transgressions of boundaries or sexual transgressions by patients. We studied the incidence of all types of boundary transgressions by patients and physicians' responses to these transgressions.Methods: We surveyed 1,000 members of the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) for the number of patient transgressions of boundaries which had occurred in the previous year. Categories were created by the investigators based on the literature. Physicians picked the most important transgression, and then were asked about their response to the transgression and its effect on the patient-physician relationship. Attitudinal questions addressed the likelihood of discharging patients who transgressed boundaries. The impact of demographic variables on the incidence of transgressions was analyzed using analysis of variance.Results: Three hundred thirty (37.5%) randomly selected SGIM members responded to the survey. Almost three quarters of the respondents had patients who used their first name, while 43% encountered verbal abuse, 39% had patients who asked personal questions, 31% had patients who were overly affectionate, and 27% encountered patients who attempted to socialize. All other transgressions, including physical abuse and attempts at sexual contact, were uncommon. Only gender affected the incidence of transgressions; female physicians encountered more personal questions (P = .001), inappropriate affection (P < .005), and sexually explicit language (P < .05) than male physicians and responded more negatively to boundary transgressions. Respondents dealt with transgressions by discussion with the patient or colleagues or by ignoring the incident, but such transgressions generally had a negative impact on the relationship. Most physicians would discharge patients who engaged in physical abuse or attempts at sexual contact, but were more tolerant of verbal abuse and overly affectionate patients.Conclusions: Boundary transgressions by patients is common, but usually involves more minor infractions. Female physicians are more likely to encounter certain types of transgressions. The incidence and outcomes of such transgressions are important in assisting physicians to deal effectively with this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We designed a questionnaire survey to study internal medicine residents' plans to use a chaperone during the pelvic, breast, rectal, and testicular examinations. We found chaperone use by male and female residents differed markedly, and neither group planned to use chaperones universally. When examining female patients, male residents overall were very likely to use a chaperone during a pelvic exam, but less likely for the breast exam and rectal exam. For the female resident, there was a significantly lower likelihood of using chaperones during the pelvic, breast, or rectal exams. There was a much lower rate of chaperone use during the sensitive portions of the male physical examination compared with the female examination, with somewhat higher use by female residents. We concluded that male and female residents differ significantly in their patterns of chaperone use. It would be valuable to develop guidelines for chaperone use to help residents understand the issues involved in the choices, and to protect the residents from the possible medico-legal consequences of forgoing chaperones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To describe a new quality assessment method used to classify the preventability of hospitalization in terms of patient, clinician, or system factors.Design: The instrument was developed in two phases. Phase 1 was a prospective comparison of admitting residents' and their attending physicians' classifications of the perceived preventability of consecutive admissions to one Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) excluding admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU). In phase 2, a panel of 10 physicians rated 811 abstracted records of readmissions from nine VAMCs.Setting: Nine VAMCs across the United States with varying degrees of university hospital affiliation.Patients: Phase 1, 156 patients admitted to the general medicine service at the Durham VAMC. Phase 2, 514 patients accounting for 811 readmissions within 6 months of a general medicine service discharge at nine VAMCs.Measurements and Main Results: Physicians used a checklist to record the reason for hospitalization, the preventability of the hospitalization, and, if preventable, a reason defining preventability, which was classified in terms of system, clinician, and patient factors. In phase 2, two physician panelists assessed preventability for each chart. When two panelists disagreed on the preventability of hospitalization, a third panelist, blind to the original assessments, rated the chart. In phase 1, residents and attending physicians rated 33% and 34% of admissions as preventable (kappa = 0.41), respectively. In phase 2, 277 (34%) of 811 readmissions were deemed preventable. Intraobserver accuracy for the assessment of preventability was 96% (kappa = 0.89). interobserver accuracy was 73% (kappa = 0.43). Hospital system factors accounted for 37% of preventable readmissions, clinician factors for 38%, and patient factors for 21%. The nine hospitals differed markedly in their profile of reasons for preventable readmissions (p = .005).Conclusions: Using a new method of determining the preventability of hospitalizations, we identified several factors that might avert hospitalizations. Focusing efforts to identify preventable hospitalizations may yield better methods for managing patients' total health care needs; however, the content of those efforts will vary by institution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence of current suicidal ideation among urban primary care outpatients was assessed, and suicidal and non-suicidal patients were compared with regard to their demographic characteristics and their attitudes toward mental health screening. Twenty (3.3%) patients reported having thoughts of killing themselves. The patients who had suicidal ideation were significantly younger and more frequently divorced. Almost all (97.6%) of the patients indicated that their physicians should inquire about emotional health issues at some time, and the suicidal patients were nonsignificantly more likely to recommend inquiry about psychiatric symptoms at every visit (55.0% vs 37.0%, p < 0.11). Only half of the suicidal patients reported lifetime histories of mental health treatment. The majority (70.2%) of the patients believed that it would be easy to discuss mental health problems with their medical physicians. Among the patients who had previously received psychiatric treatment, the suicidal patients were nearly three times more likely to anticipate that it would be difficult or very difficult to talk to their physicians about psychiatric problems. In contrast, among the patients who had no history of mental health treatment, there was no association between suicidal ideation and anticipated discomfort in talking with their physicians about emotional health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To study the prevalence of intern candidates accepted through the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) or after the match who subsequently withdraw and the attitudes of program directors regarding this issue.Design: Mailed survey.Setting: Four hundred fifty-four internal medicine program directors.Measurements: Questionnaires assessing program directors' attitudes toward interns who contract for positions after having verbal or written agreements elsewhere (and the program directors who accept them), the importance of this problem, and the incidence of this problem.Main Results: Fifty-five programs (of the 221 responding) experienced intern withdrawals. Programs with larger numbers of open positions after the match had more intern withdrawals (p = 0.03). Eleven of the program directors knew of the prior commitment of the intern, and in all cases the other program director was called for permission to accept the intern. Program directors had negative feelings about both the interns who withdrew and the program directors who accepted them. Community, municipal, and Veterans Affairs hospital program directors were significantly less negative than those in university and university-affiliated hospitals toward interns who withdrew from written commitments (p = 0.001) and the program directors who accepted them (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Problems with intern candidate withdrawals from offered/matched programs affect a significant proportion of programs, especially those with larger numbers of unmatched positions. Program directors are generally disapproving. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study used a questionnaire to examine how patients in the HIV/AIDS Clinic at a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital were told of their diagnosis, by whom, and to what degree they were given emotional and educational support. Nearly 17% of patients were informed by someone not in the health professions (often military personnel), and 27% of patients were notified in a nonprivate setting. Forty-seven percent indicated they received little or no educational support at the time of diagnosis, while 39% received little or no emotional support. Educational and emotional support for patients at the time of HIV diagnosis may be lacking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study assessed variables involved in physician decisions to breach confidentiality in cases of patients' self-reported past crimes. Seventy internal medicine residents completed a questionnaire containing case vignettes of patients' self-reports of crimes; likelihood of informing the police was ascertained. Results were analyzed according to the type and cost of the crime, previous criminal record, patient characteristics, and intent of the patient to commit future crimes. Results also were analyzed by postgraduate year of the resident. Patient characteristics of race and socioeconomic status had no effect on the decision (p less than 0.122 and p 0.182), although age did (p less than 0.001). Reports of past violence (p less than 0.001), previous criminal record (p less than 0.001) and high-cost crime (p less than 0.007) increased the likelihood of breaching confidentiality. Future intent affected the decision (p less than 0.005), but less than reports of past violence. No differences were seen among postgraduate years of respondents (p less than 0.873). Residents base decisions to breach confidentiality on factors other than the future intent of specific violence. This finding has legal and ethical implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]