Search

Abstract Liver cirrhosis is the final stage of chronic liver disease (CLD) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Various complications such as portal hypertension, ascites retention, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome deeply affect patient outcome. The most common tools to predict the outcome of a CLD patient include the following: assessing severity of portal hypertension; scoring systems such as the model of end‐stage liver disease and Child–Pugh score and blood biomarkers related to complications and/or survival rate. In this article, we summarize recent studies of noninvasive markers for predicting impending complications related to CLD and discuss the clinical value of currently available blood biomarkers based on evidence from the literature. In addition, noninvasive blood biomarker assays for different prognostic functions were validated on 113 liver cirrhosis patients at our institution using Kaplan–Meier curve analysis to confirm that these markers can satisfactorily predict CLD‐related patient death.

Abstract We present a rare case of acute duodenal variceal rupture after B‐RTO that was successfully treated with endoscopic CA injection therapy. A 74‐year‐old Japanese woman was transferred to our hospital due to progressive general malaise and hematemesis. Gastroduodenoscopy (GDS) showed duodenal varices without active bleeding in the second portion of duodenum. Balloon‐occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B‐RTO) was carried out to prevent duodenal variceal rebleeding. Good pooling of ethanolamine oleate with iopamidol (EOI) was observed in duodenal varices using balloon catheters. However, massive melena was observed immediately after B‐RTO. Emergent GDS revealed a white plug on the treated varix, thus endoscopic cyanoacrylate (CA) injection therapy was performed. We speculated that the injection of EOI increased the pressure in the duodenal varices which resulted in rupture of duodenal varices. B‐RTO was effective therapy to prevent duodenal variceal rebleeding, but postprocedural monitoring is required as illustrated by this case. We suggest that careful monitoring and backup system for endoscopy are required during or after B‐RTO.