Search

Purpose: Children with pediatric gliomas harboring a BRAF V600E mutation have poor outcomes with current chemoradiotherapy strategies. Our aim was to study the role of targeted BRAF inhibition in these tumors., Patients and Methods: We collected clinical, imaging, molecular, and outcome information from patients with BRAF V600E-mutated glioma treated with BRAF inhibition across 29 centers from multiple countries., Results: Sixty-seven patients were treated with BRAF inhibition (pediatric low-grade gliomas [PLGGs], n = 56; pediatric high-grade gliomas [PHGGs], n = 11) for up to 5.6 years. Objective responses were observed in 80% of PLGGs, compared with 28% observed with conventional chemotherapy ( P < .001). These responses were rapid (median, 4 months) and sustained in 86% of tumors up to 5 years while receiving therapy. After discontinuation of BRAF inhibition, 76.5% (13 of 17) of patients with PLGG experienced rapid progression (median, 2.3 months). However, upon rechallenge with BRAF inhibition, 90% achieved an objective response. Poor prognostic factors in conventional therapies, such as concomitant homozygous deletion of CDKN2A , were not associated with lack of response to BRAF inhibition. In contrast, only 36% of those with PHGG responded to BRAF inhibition, with all but one tumor progressing within 18 months. In PLGG, responses translated to 3-year progression-free survival of 49.6% (95% CI, 35.3% to 69.5%) versus 29.8% (95% CI, 20% to 44.4%) for BRAF inhibition versus chemotherapy, respectively ( P = .02)., Conclusion: Use of BRAF inhibition results in robust and durable responses in BRAF V600E-mutated PLGG. Prospective studies are required to determine long-term survival and functional outcomes with BRAF inhibitor therapy in childhood gliomas., Competing Interests: The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center. Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments). Vijay RamaswamyHonoraria: AstraZenecaMiriam BornhorstConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/MedImmuneDaniel R. BoueStock and Other Ownership Interests: Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Intuitive Surgical, IlluminaAdela CaneteConsulting or Advisory Role: EUSA Pharma, Bayer Speakers’ Bureau: EUSA PHarma Research Funding: EUSA Pharma (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: EUSA PharmaIra J. DunkelConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Apexigen, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Novartis (Inst)Karen GauvainEmployment: Iqvia Biotech Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Axiom Health Care SciencesJordan R. HansfordConsulting or Advisory Role: BayerSarah G. InjacResearch Funding: TakedaMatthias KarajannisConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Recursion Pharma Research Funding: Novartis Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bayer Uncompensated Relationships: Debiopharm (Inst) Open Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/710370/summaryNormand LaperriereHonoraria: Merck/Schering Plough Consulting or Advisory Role: AbbVieAlvaro LassalettaConsulting or Advisory Role: Shire, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Roche Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Shire, Gilead SciencesRoger PackerHonoraria: Novartis Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZenecaJaroslav SterbaResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech (Inst) Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers SquibbDerek S. TsangOther Relationship: Varian Medical Systems (Inst), Mevion Medical Systems (Inst), Hitachi (Inst), RaySearch Laboratories (Inst), IBA (Inst), ProTom (Inst)Cornelis M. van TilburgConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, BayerOlaf WittConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Janssen Research & Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, BayerEric BouffetResearch Funding: Roche (Inst), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst)Cynthia HawkinsConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: IP for low-grade glioma and sarcoma fusion panels as well as medulloblastoma subgrouping panel No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)