Search

At present, a lack of consensus exists regarding the clinical impact of osteoporosis on alveolar bone metabolism during implant osseointegration. While limited preclinical and clinical evidence demonstrates a negative influence of osteoporosis on dental extraction socket healing, no preclinical studies offer data on the results of implant placement in 6-mo-old, ovariectomized (OVX) Sprague-Dawley rats. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of dental tooth extraction socket healing and implant placement in a rodent model of osteoporosis following daily vehicle (VEH) or abaloparatide (ABL) administration. Micro-CT and histologic analysis demonstrated signs of delayed wound healing, consistent with alveolar osteitis in extraction sockets following 42 d of healing in both the VEH and ABL groups. In a semiquantitative histological analysis, the OVX-ABL group demonstrated a tendency for improved socket regeneration with a 3-fold greater rate for moderate socket healing when compared to the OVX-VEH group (43% vs 14%), however, this finding was not statistically significant ( p =.11). No significant differences were observed between vehicle and test groups in terms of implant outcomes (BMD and bone volume/total volume) at 14- and 21-d post-implant placement. Abaloparatide (ABL) significantly increased BMD of the femoral shaft and intact maxillary alveolar bone sites in OVX animals, demonstrating the therapeutic potential for oral hard tissue regeneration. The present model involving estrogen-deficiency-induced bone loss demonstrated an impaired healing response to dental extraction and implant installation., Competing Interests: B.M. and B.L. are employees of Radius Health, Inc. P.K. is a consultant to Amgen Inc, AgNovos, Ascendis, Ashi Bio, Mesentech, NextCure, Beren Therapeutics, Radius Health, UCB, and Myovant/Sumimoto., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Osteoporosis in men is an underappreciated public health issue, accounting for approximately 30% of the societal burden of osteoporosis. Although the prevalence of osteoporosis in men is lower, fracture-related morbidity and mortality rates exceed those of women. Abaloparatide is a synthetic, 34-amino acid peptide with homology to human parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), which favors bone formation by selective activation of PTH receptor type 1. In the Abaloparatide for the Treatment of Men With Osteoporosis (ATOM; NCT03512262) trial, 228 men with primary or hypogonadism-associated osteoporosis were randomized to receive subcutaneous injections of abaloparatide 80 μg or placebo. Abaloparatide significantly improved LS, TH, and FN BMD when compared with placebo. In this prespecified analysis, the proportion of men with a percent change from baseline of >0%, >3%, and > 6% in BMD at the LS, TH, and FN at 3, 6, and 12 mo and/or a shift in T-score category (based on LS and TH T-scores) at 12 mo was compared between the abaloparatide and placebo groups in ATOM. There were significantly more men with a BMD gain of >3% at all 3 anatomical sites in the abaloparatide than placebo group at month 6 (18/122 [14.8%] vs 1/70 [1.4%], P  = .002) and at month 12 (38/119 [31.9%] vs 1/66 [1.5%], P  < .0001). At month 3, more men treated with abaloparatide than placebo had a > 3% BMD increase at the LS (82/134 [61.2%] vs 21/68 [30.9%], P  < .0001). A greater proportion of men treated with abaloparatide had an improvement in T-score category from osteoporosis to low BMD or normal when compared with placebo. In conclusion, use of abaloparatide compared with placebo for 12 mo resulted in significant and rapid improvements in BMD in men with osteoporosis from the ATOM study., Competing Interests: R.D. serves on the scientific advisory board and/or as a consultant for Amgen, Alexion, Ultragenyx, and Radius, and received research grants (to the institution) from Alexion, Radius, Shire, and Takeda. D.K. reports consultancies with Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer, honoraria for advice or public speaking from Amgen and Eli Lilly, and grants/research support from Radius and AstraZeneca. K.S. reports research grants from Amgen, Mereo, and Radius, and consulting fees from Amgen and Daaichi Sankyo. S.W.I. has received research grants paid to his institution from Alexion, Amgen, Amolyt, Calcilytix, Radius, Takeda, and Ultragenyx, and has served on an advisory board and/or consultant for Amgen, Bone Health & Osteoporosis Foundation, Extend Biosciences, Radius, and Soft Bones, Inc. A.S. has received research grants paid to her institution from Radius and UCB, consulting fees from Agnovos, Amgen, Radius, and UCB, and speaking fees from Amgen and Radius. R.A. has received research grants paid to his institution from Radius. L.P., Y.W., and B.M. are employees of Radius., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) increases fracture risk despite normal or increased BMD. Abaloparatide reduces fracture risk in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO); however, its efficacy in women with T2DM is unknown. This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of abaloparatide in patients with T2DM. The analysis included patients with T2DM from the A baloparatide C omparator T rial I n V ertebral E ndpoints (ACTIVE), a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial. In ACTIVE, participants were randomized 1:1:1 to daily s.c. injections of placebo, abaloparatide (80 μg), or open-label teriparatide (20 μg) for 18 months. A total of 198 women with PMO and T2DM from 21 centers in 10 countries were identified from ACTIVE through review of their medical records. The main outcomes measured included effect of abaloparatide versus placebo on BMD and trabecular bone score (TBS), with secondary outcomes of fracture risk and safety, in patients from ACTIVE with T2DM. Significant ( p  < 0.001) improvements in BMD at total hip (mean change 3.0% versus -0.4%), femoral neck (2.6% versus -0.2%), and lumbar spine (8.9% versus 1.3%) and TBS at lumbar spine (3.72% versus -0.56%) were observed with abaloparatide versus placebo at 18 months. Fracture events were fewer with abaloparatide treatment in patients with T2DM, and differences were not significant between groups except nonvertebral fractures in the abaloparatide versus placebo groups ( p = 0.04). Safety was consistent with the ACTIVE population. In conclusion, in women with PMO and T2DM, abaloparatide treatment resulted in significant improvements in BMD and TBS versus placebo, consistent with the overall ACTIVE population © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research., (© 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)