Search

ImportanceThe geographic distribution of pediatric ophthalmological care has not been reported on since 2007; understanding this distribution could shed light on potential avenues to increase access, which is a necessary first step in addressing the pediatric ophthalmological needs of underserved areas.ObjectiveTo analyze the number and location (ie, geographic distribution) of pediatric ophthalmologists in relation to US population demographic characteristics.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this cross-sectional study, public databases from the American Academy of Ophthalmology and American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus were used to identify pediatric ophthalmologists in the US as of March 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresGeographic distribution of pediatric ophthalmologists listed in public databases and any association between pediatric ophthalmologist distribution and US population demographic characteristics. Addresses were geocoded using ArcGIS Pro (Esri).ResultsA total of 1056 pediatric ophthalmologists (611 men [57.9%]) were identified. States with the most pediatric ophthalmologists were California (n = 116 [11.0%]), New York (n = 97 [9.2%]), Florida (n = 69 [6.5%]), and Texas (n = 62 [5.9%]), the 4 most populous states. A total of 2828 of 3142 counties (90.0%) and 4 of 50 states (8.0%) had 0 pediatric ophthalmologists. In 314 counties (10.0%) with 1 or more pediatric ophthalmologists, the mean (range) pediatric ophthalmologists per million persons was 7.7 (0.4-185.5). The range of practitioner to million persons has increased since 2007. Counties with 1 or more pediatric ophthalmologists had a higher median (SD) household income compared with counties with 0 pediatric ophthalmologists ($70 230.59 [$18 945.05] vs $53 263.62 [$12 786.07]; difference, −$16 966.97; 95% CI, −$18 544.57 to −$14 389.37; P P P P = .001) were greater in counties with 0 compared with counties with 1 or more pediatric ophthalmologists.Conclusion and RelevanceThis cross-sectional study found that disparities in access to pediatric ophthalmological care have increased over the past 15 years and are associated with lower socioeconomic status. As patients may rely on online sources to identify the nearest pediatric ophthalmologist, accurate publicly available databases are important.

Importance Although the association between suture colonization and postoperative infections remains hypothetical, measures to reduce perioperative suture colonization may minimize postoperative infections. The suture colonization rate in adjustable suture strabismus surgery is not well defined, and the effect of povidone-iodine use on suture colonization is unknown. Objective To assess whether povidone-iodine application at the end of adjustable suture strabismus surgery decreases the suture colonization rate. Design, Setting, and Participants In this randomized clinical trial designed in 2015 and performed from June 1 through October 31, 2015, a total of 65 adjustable and 43 control suture specimens from 65 demographically similar adults undergoing adjustable suture strabismus surgery were studied. A random sampling assigned participants into group 1 (with povidone-iodine) or group 2 (without povidone-iodine) at the end of surgery. A control suture specimen was obtained if ipsilateral nonadjustable surgery was performed. Both groups received antibiotic ointment at the end of the procedure. No patients refused participation or withdrew. Data analysis was performed from October 1 to December 31, 2015. Observers were unaware of patient grouping. Interventions One drop of 5% povidone-iodine directly over the sliding noose of the adjustable suture at the end of surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The suture colonization rate after adjustment in group 1, group 2, and the control group. Results Of 65 adults undergoing surgery, there were 17 men (49%) and 18 women (51%) in group 1 and 10 men (33%) and 20 women (67%) in group 2, as well as 20 men (47%) and 23 women (53%) in the control group. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 48.5 (16.8) years in group 1, 46.6 (18.1) years in group 2, and 47.7 (17.0) years in the control group. There was no difference in the colonization rate between group 1 (57%) and group 2 (47%) (relative risk [RR], 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6-1.7; P = .80), group 1 and the control group (44%) (RR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5-1.8; P > .99), or group 2 and the control group (RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8-2.1; P = .62). Eleven bacterial species were identified. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the predominant isolate (40 of 56 [71%]). A longer interval between the end of surgery and adjustment was associated with higher culture positivity (6.3 hours in positive vs 4.4 hours in negative cultures, P = .001); however, there was no difference in bacterial growth between the groups. No adverse effects of povidone-iodine were observed. Conclusions and Relevance This study was not able to demonstrate that povidone-iodine at the end of adjustable suture strabismus surgery reduces the suture colonization rate. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT02424357.