Search

BACKGROUND Short message service (SMS) surveys are a promising tool for understanding whether preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence aligns with risk for HIV acquisition-a concept known as prevention-effective adherence. METHODS The Partners Demonstration Project was an open-label study of integrated PrEP and antiretroviral therapy (ART) delivery among high-risk HIV serodiscordant couples in East Africa. HIV-uninfected partners were offered PrEP until their HIV-infected partner had taken ART for ≥6 months. At 2 study sites, HIV-uninfected partners were offered enrollment into the Partners Mobile Adherence to PrEP (PMAP) substudy based on ongoing PrEP use, personal cell phone ownership, and ability to use SMS. SMS surveys asked about PrEP adherence and sexual activity in the previous 24 hours; these surveys were sent daily for the 7 days before and 7 days after routine study visits in the Partners Demonstration Project. RESULTS The PMAP substudy enrolled 373 HIV-uninfected partners; 69% were men and mean age was 31 years. Participants completed 17,030 of 23,056 SMS surveys sent (74%) with a mean of 47 surveys per participant over 9.8 months of follow-up. While HIV-infected partner use of ART was

BACKGROUND: Daily preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy but adherence is required for maximum benefit. To date there are no empirically supported PrEP adherence interventions. This article describes the process of developing a PrEP adherence intervention and presents results on its impact on adherence. METHODS: The Partners PrEP Study was a placebo-controlled efficacy trial of daily oral tenofovir and emtricitabine/tenofovir PrEP among uninfected members of HIV-serodiscordant couples. An ancillary adherence study was conducted at 3 study sites in Uganda. Participants with

WHO guidance recommends antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation for all persons with a known HIV-uninfected partner, as a strategy to prevent HIV transmission. Uptake of ART among HIV-infected partners in serodiscordant partnerships is not known, which we evaluated in African HIV serodiscordant couples.Prospective cohort study.Among HIV-infected persons from Kenya and Uganda who had a known heterosexual HIV-uninfected partner, we assessed ART initiation in those who became ART eligible under national guidelines during follow-up. Participants received quarterly clinical and semi-annual CD4 monitoring, and active referral for ART upon becoming eligible.Of 1958 HIV-infected ART-eligible partners, 58% were women, and the median age was 34 years. At the first visit when determined to be ART eligible, the median CD4 count was 273 cells per microliter (interquartile range, 221-330), 77% had WHO stage 1 or 2 HIV disease, and 96% were receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis. The cumulative probabilities of initiating ART at 6, 12, and 24 months after eligibility were 49.9%, 70.0%, and 87.6%, respectively. Younger age [25 years; adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 1.39; P = 0.001], higher CD4 count (AHR, 1.95; P0.001 for350 compared with200 cells/µL), higher education (AHR, 1.25; P0.001), and lack of income (AHR, 1.15; P = 0.02) were independent predictors for delay in ART initiation.In the context of close CD4 monitoring, ART counseling, and active linkage to HIV care, a substantial proportion of HIV-infected persons with a known HIV-uninfected partner delayed ART initiation. Strategies to motivate ART initiation are needed, particularly for younger persons with higher CD4 counts.

This randomized comparative study assessed the efficacy and safety of a 10-mg once-daily topical regimen of miconazole nitrate mucoadhesive buccal tablet (n = 178) versus a 400-mg once-daily systemic regimen of ketoconazole (n = 179) in HIV-positive patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. A total of 357 patients were treated for 7 or 14 days depending on response after 7 days of treatment. Clinical response was the primary outcome variable, and secondary outcomes included microscopy, time to cure, symptom scores, and safety outcomes. A per-protocol analysis of 332 patients demonstrated that miconazole nitrate was not statistically significantly inferior to ketoconazole treatment. At day 7, the clinical response rate was 135 of 156 (87%) for miconazole nitrate and 137 of 153 (90%) for ketoconazole (90% confidence interval of the treatment difference: [-9%; 3%]). At the end of treatment, dysphagia was 1% in both groups. Microscopic findings paralleled the clinical results. The mucoadhesive tablet was generally well tolerated. A higher incidence of gastrointestinal disorders and drug-related adverse events was seen during ketoconazole treatment. The low-dose 10-mg miconazole mucoadhesive tablet is not inferior to systemic antifungal treatment with ketoconazole in the treatment of AIDS-related oropharyngeal candidiasis with and without dysphagia. It provides the first and only once-daily topical treatment option and should therefore be considered in first-line therapy for this condition, particularly in resource-poor settings, where ease of use can help to guarantee the success of therapy.