Search

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: The timing and magnitude of antiretroviral therapy–associated weight change attributions are unclear. Setting: HIV Outpatient Study participants. Methods: We analyzed 2007–2018 records of virally suppressed (VS) persons without integrase inhibitor (INSTI) experience who switched to either INSTI-based or another non–INSTI-based ART, and remained VS. We analyzed BMI changes using linear mixed models, INSTI- and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) contributions to BMI change by linear mixed models–estimated slopes, and BMI inflection points. Results: Among 736 participants (5316 person-years), 441 (60%) switched to INSTI-based ART; the remainder to non–INSTI-based ART. The mean follow-up was 7.15 years for INSTI recipients and 7.35 years for non-INSTI. Preswitch, INSTI and non-INSTI groups had similar median BMI (26.3 versus 25.9 kg/m2, P = 0.41). INSTI regimens included raltegravir (178), elvitegravir (112), and dolutegravir (143). Monthly BMI increases postswitch were greater with INSTI than non-INSTI (0.0525 versus 0.006, P < 0.001). A BMI inflection point occurred 8 months after switch among INSTI users; slopes were similar regardless of TAF use immediately postswitch. Among INSTI + TAF users, during 8 months postswitch, 87% of BMI slope change was associated with INSTI use, 13% with TAF use; after 8 months, estimated contributions were 27% and 73%, respectively. For non-INSTI+TAF, 84% of BMI gain was TAF-associated consistently postswitch. Persons switching from TDF to TAF had greater BMI increases than others (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Among VS persons who switched ART, INSTI and TAF use were independently associated with BMI increases. During 8 months postswitch, BMI changes were greatest and most associated with INSTI use; afterward, gradual BMI gain was largely TAF-associated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) achieves increased renal safety and improved alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization but increased lipid profile in hepatitis B virus (HBV)–monoinfected patients switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). It is unclear whether HIV coinfection perturbs these biochemical changes. To this end, we assessed these parameters in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients switched from TDF to TAF. Design: Retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Methods: HIV/HBV-coinfected patients switched from TDF to TAF-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) at 6 Canadian Hepatitis B Network (CanHepB) academic sites were included. Changes in lipid profile, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and ALT were evaluated using linear mixed effect model regression. Results: Eighty-two HIV/HBV-coinfected patients with a mean 103-week follow-up duration were identified. At time of TAF switch, 80 of 82 (98%) were HBV virally suppressed, 29 of 82 (35%) had elevated ALT levels, and 63 of 82 (77%) had eGFR of ≥60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Twenty-six/Eighty-two (32%) had preexisting renal comorbidities. There were no changes in total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride levels 2 years after TAF switch. Those with elevated ALT levels achieved greater ALT normalization after TAF switch (−0.004 [−0.008 to 0.0] log10U/L/mo, P = 0.03). eGFR decline rate while on TDF (−0.66 [−0.23 to −1.08] mL/min/month, P < 0.005) was diminished after switching to TAF (−0.02 [−0.16 to 0.11] mL/min/mo, P = 0.7) and those with eGFR of <60 mL/min experienced increase in eGFR after TAF switch (0.45 [0.03–0.87] mL/min/mo, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Our study supports switching from TDF to TAF with positive influence on overall long-term biochemical profile in HIV/HBV-coinfected individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Proximal renal tubulopathy (PRT) is an infrequent complication of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). It remains to be established whether tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) can be safely administered to individuals who experienced PRT on TDF. Methods: Individuals with a history of TDF-associated PRT and current estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 30 mL/min/1.73 m² initiated TAF and were followed for 96 weeks. The primary outcome of interest was recurrent PRT. Secondary outcomes were changes in kidney biomarkers, bone biomarkers, and bone mineral density (BMD). Data were analyzed using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models. The trial was registered under EudraCT 2016-003345-29. Results: All 31 participants [median age 55 (inter-quartile range 51, 60) years, 97% men, 87% White ethnicity] remained on TAF at week 96, and none developed glycosuria or recurrent PRT. Participants experienced small declines in eGFR-creatinine [-1.9 (95% confidence interval: -3.5 to -0.3) mL/min/1.73 m²/yr; P = 0.024], but not in eGFR-cystatin C [-0.9 (-2.1 to 0.4) mL/min/1.73 m²/yr; P = 0.16]. Ten (32%) and 5 (16%) participants experienced rapid (>5 mL/min/1.73 m²/yr) decline in eGFR-creatinine and eGFR-cystatin C. No significant change in other kidney biomarkers, bone turnover, or BMD was observed (P > 0.2). Conclusions: In individuals with a history of PRT on TDF, 96 weeks of TAF was not associated with recurrent PRT or adverse effects on renal tubular function, bone turnover, or BMD. These data suggest that TAF is a treatment option for this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a prodrug of the nucleotide analogue tenofovir (TFV), is an antiretroviral (ARV) agent approved either as a complete regimen [elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine (F)/TAF, rilpivirine/F/TAF, bictegravir/F/TAF], or for use with other ARVs (F/TAF), for treatment of HIV. TAF is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporters. Disposition of TAF may be altered by comedications that can inhibit or induce P-gp or BCRP transporters. The effects of ARVs on the pharmacokinetics of TAF were evaluated in 3 studies. Methods: Healthy participants received TAF administered alone or with rilpivirine in study 1, with dolutegravir, ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV + RTV), lopinavir (LPV/RTV), or darunavir (DRV + RTV) in study 2, and with the pharmacokinetic enhancer cobicistat or efavirenz in study 3. Results: Across the 3 studies, 98 participants received treatment with TAF and a coadministered agent (n = 10-34/cohort). All study treatments were well tolerated. TAF and TFV exposures were unaffected after co-administration with rilpivirine and dolutegravir. Coadministration with P-gp/BCRP inhibitors such as cobicistat or PI-based regimens (ATV + RTV, LPV/r, or DRV + RTV) resulted in a range of 6%-183% increases in TAF and 105%-316% increases in TFV exposure, whereas coadministration with a P-gp inducer, efavirenz, resulted in a 15%-24% decrease in TAF and TFV exposure. Conclusions: Evaluation of the drug interaction between TAF and other commonly prescribed boosted and unboosted ARVs provides characterization of the susceptibility of TAF and/or TFV pharmacokinetics to inhibitors or inducers of P-gp/BCRP transporters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The integrase inhibitor regimen [elvitegravir/cobicistat/ emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)] demonstrated superior efficacy when compared with a protease inhibitor regimen [ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV + RTV) and FTC/TDF] in 575 treatment-naive women at week 48. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to a TAF-based, single-tablet regimen containing elvitegravir, cobicistat, FTC, and tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) versus remaining on ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF. Methods: After completing the initial randomized, blinded phase, virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA,50 copies/mL) women on ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF were rerandomized (3:1) to receive openlabel E/C/F/TAF versus remaining on their current regimen. The primary end point was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA,50 copies per milliliter at week 48 (U.S. FDA snapshot algorithm), with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 12%. Safety [adverse events (AEs)] and tolerability were also assessed. Results: Of 575 women originally randomized and treated in the blinded phase, 159 were rerandomized to switch to E/C/F/TAF and 53 to remain on ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF. At week 48, virologic suppression was maintained in 150 (94%) of women on E/C/F/TAF and 46 (87%) on ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF [difference 7.5% (95% confidence interval 21.2% to 19.4%)], demonstrating noninferiority of E/C/F/TAF to ATV + RTV and FTC/TDF. Incidence of AEs was similar between groups; study drug--related AEs were more common with E/C/F/TAF (11% versus 4%). Conclusions: Switching to E/C/F/TAF was noninferior to continuing ATV + RTV plus FTC/TDF in maintaining virologic suppression and was well tolerated at 48 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide(E/C/F/TAF) has high efficacy and improved renal and bone safety in multiple phase 3 trials; TAF single agent is being studied in 2 phase 3 trials in patients with chronic hepatitis B. We report the results of an open-label, noncomparative switch study evaluating the efficacy and safety of E/C/F/TAF in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected adults. At 48 weeks, 91.7% of the 72 participants maintained or achieved virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL; HBV DNA <29 IU/mL). Seroconversion occurred in 2.9% of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive participants and in 3.3% of HBV e antigen-positive participants; 40% of those with abnormal alanine aminotransferase normalized. E/C/F/TAF was associated with improved renal function and reduced bone turnover. These data support the use of E/C/F/TAF in treating HIV/HBV coinfection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]