1. Obesity Paradox in the Clinical Significance of Effective Prosthetic Orifice Area After Aortic Valve Replacement
- Author
-
Rosario Pilato, Flavien Vincent, Stéphanie Mouton, Anne-Laure Madika, Bertrand Boutie, Sandro Ninni, Marjorie Richardson, Mathilde Jacquelinet, Claire Seunes, H. Ridon, Alexandre Altes, Bruno Jegou, Bart Staels, Patrizio Lancellotti, Guillaume Ledieu, Thomas Modine, Staniel Ortmans, Emmanuel Robin, David Montaigne, André Vincentelli, Mohamad Koussa, Augustin Coisne, Jean-Louis Edmé, Cedric Klein, and Francis Juthier
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Treatment outcome ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Prosthesis Design ,Risk Assessment ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Body Mass Index ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Postoperative Complications ,Aortic valve replacement ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Clinical significance ,Obesity ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Bioprosthesis ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,business.industry ,Aortic Valve Stenosis ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Stenosis ,Treatment Outcome ,Orifice area ,Aortic Valve ,Heart Valve Prosthesis ,Aortic valve surgery ,cardiovascular system ,Cardiology ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Obesity paradox - Abstract
The definition of prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) remains to be refined to enhance its prognosis insight after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for severe aortic stenosis, especially in obese patients [(1)][1]. We aimed at investigating the respective prevalence and prognostic value of
- Published
- 2018