1. Pacing Using Cardiac Implantable Electric Device During TAVR: 10-Year Experience of a High-Volume Center.
- Author
-
Haum M, Steffen J, Sadoni S, Theiss H, Stark K, Estner H, Massberg S, Deseive S, and Lackermair K
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Aged, 80 and over, Treatment Outcome, Time Factors, Aged, Risk Factors, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Risk Assessment, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement adverse effects, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement instrumentation, Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery, Aortic Valve Stenosis physiopathology, Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Pacemaker, Artificial, Feasibility Studies, Hospitals, High-Volume, Aortic Valve surgery, Aortic Valve physiopathology, Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective and safe therapy for severe aortic stenosis. Rapid or fast pacing is required for implantation, which can be performed via a pre-existing cardiac implantable electric device (CIED). However, safety data on CIEDs for pacing in TAVR are missing., Objectives: The aim of this study was to elucidate procedural safety and feasibility of internal pacing with a CIED in TAVR., Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR with a CIED were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and complications according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) criteria after TAVR were compared between both groups., Results: A total of 486 patients were included. Pacing was performed using a CIED in 150 patients and a transient pacemaker in 336 patients. No differences in technical success according to VARC-3 criteria or procedure duration occurred between the groups. The usage of transient pacers for pacing was associated with a significantly higher bleeding rate (bleeding type ≥2 according to VARC-3-criteria; 2.0% vs 13.1%; P < 0.01). Furthermore, impairment of the CIED appeared in 2.3% of patients after TAVR only in the group in which pacing was performed by a transient pacer, leading to surgical revision of the CIED in 1.3% of all patients when transient pacemakers were used., Conclusions: Internal pacing using a CIED is safe and feasible without differences of procedural time and technical success and might reduce bleeding rates. Furthermore, pacing using a CIED circumvents the risk of lead dislocation. Our data provide an urgent call for the use of a CIED for pacing during a TAVR procedure in general., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Drs Steffen, Deseive, and Lackermair have received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF