Search

Background: In suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), this presumed diagnosis may not hold true in all cases, particularly in patients with nonobstructive coronary arteries (NOCA). Additionally, in multivessel coronary artery disease, the presumed infarct-related artery may be incorrect., Objectives: This study sought to assess the diagnostic utility of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) before invasive coronary angiogram (ICA) in suspected NSTEMI., Methods: A total of 100 consecutive stable patients with suspected acute NSTEMI (70% male, age 62 ± 11 years) prospectively underwent CMR pre-ICA to assess cardiac function (cine), edema (T 2 -weighted imaging, T 1 mapping), and necrosis/scar (late gadolinium enhancement). CMR images were interpreted blinded to ICA findings. The clinical care and ICA teams were blinded to CMR findings until post-ICA., Results: Early CMR (median 33 hours postadmission and 4 hours pre-ICA) confirmed only 52% (52 of 100) of patients had subendocardial infarction, 15% transmural infarction, 18% nonischemic pathologies (myocarditis, takotsubo, and other forms of cardiomyopathies), and 11% normal CMR; 4% were nondiagnostic. Subanalyses according to ICA findings showed that, in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (73 of 100), CMR confirmed only 84% (61 of 73) had MI, 10% (7 of 73) nonischemic pathologies, and 5% (4 of 73) normal. In patients with NOCA (27 of 100), CMR found MI in only 22% (6 of 27 true MI with NOCA), and reclassified the presumed diagnosis of NSTEMI in 67% (18 of 27: 11 nonischemic pathologies, 7 normal). In patients with CMR-MI and obstructive coronary artery disease (61 of 100), CMR identified a different infarct-related artery in 11% (7 of 61)., Conclusions: In patients presenting with suspected NSTEMI, a CMR-first strategy identified MI in 67%, nonischemic pathologies in 18%, and normal findings in 11%. Accordingly, CMR has the potential to affect at least 50% of all patients by reclassifying their diagnosis or altering their potential management., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The OxAMI study is supported by a British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) Oxford (RE/13/1/30181), and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. Dr Shanmuganathan has received funding from the Alison Brading Memorial Graduate Scholarship in Medical Science, Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford. Dr Burrage has received support from a British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship (FS/19/65/34692). Dr Gara has received a European Society of Cardiology, EACVI Research grant. Dr Piechnik has received support from the BHF CRE Oxford (RE/18/3/34214); and has patent authorship rights for U.S. patent 9285446 B2 (systems and methods for Shortened Look Locker Inversion Recovery [Sh-MOLLI] cardiac gated mapping of T1), granted March 15, 2016; intellectual properties are owned and managed by Oxford University Innovations. Dr Channon has received funding from a BHF Chair award (CH/16/1/32013). Dr Ferreira has received funding from the BHF, BHF CRE Oxford, and National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Center. The funders were not involved in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with troponin elevation have a higher prevalence of cardiac abnormalities than control individuals. However, the progression and impact of myocardial injury on COVID-19 survivors remain unclear., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate myocardial injury in COVID-19 survivors with troponin elevation with baseline and follow-up imaging and to assess medium-term outcomes., Methods: This was a prospective, longitudinal cohort study in 25 United Kingdom centers (June 2020 to March 2021). Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with myocardial injury underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scans within 28 days and 6 months postdischarge. Outcomes were tracked for 12 months, with quality of life surveys (EuroQol-5 Dimension and 36-Item Short Form surveys) taken at discharge and 6 months., Results: Of 342 participants (median age: 61.3 years; 71.1% male) with baseline CMR, 338 had a 12-month follow-up, 235 had a 6-month CMR, and 215 has baseline and follow-up quality of life surveys. Of 338 participants, within 12 months, 1.2% died; 1.8% had new myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or coronary revascularization; 0.8% had new myopericarditis; and 3.3% had other cardiovascular events requiring hospitalization. At 6 months, there was a minor improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (1.8% ± 1.0%; P < 0.001), stable right ventricular ejection fraction (0.4% ± 0.8%; P = 0.50), no change in myocardial scar pattern or volume (P = 0.26), and no imaging evidence of continued myocardial inflammation. All pericardial effusions (26 of 26) resolved, and most pneumonitis resolved (95 of 101). EuroQol-5 Dimension scores indicated an overall improvement in quality of life (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Myocardial injury in severe hospitalized COVID-19 survivors is nonprogressive. Medium-term outcomes show a low incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and improved quality of life. (COVID-19 Effects on the Heart; ISRCTN58667920)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by NIHR (National Institute for Health and Care Research) and UK Research and Innovation (COV0254). West Yorkshire and Humber Clinical Research Network (CV070) funded the patient information leaflet translation. Dr Berry has received British Heart Foundation support (RE/18/6134217). Dr Artico received funding from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI Research Grant App000073878). Dr McCann is funded by a NIHR Research Professorship (RP-2017-08-ST2-007). Dr Manisty is funded by a NIHR Clinician Scientist Award (CS-2015-15-003). Drs Ferreira, Piechnik, and Neubauer acknowledge the NIHR Oxford BRC for support of this study. Dr Bucciarelli-Ducci is in part supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS (National Health Service) Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. Additional support was provided by the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Leeds Clinical Research Facility. Dr Dweck is supported by the British Heart Foundation (FS/SCRF/21/32010). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care. Dr Moon has served on Advisory Boards for Sanofi and Genzyme. Dr Miller has served on Advisory Boards for Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly Alliance, and AstraZeneca; serves as an advisor for HAYA Therapeutics and PureTech Health; and has received research support from Amicus Therapeutics, Guerbet Laboratories Limited, Roche, and Univar Solutions B.V. Dr Bucciarelli-Ducci is the chief executive officer (part-time) of the Society for Magnetic Resonance. Dr Berry is employed by the University of Glasgow, which holds research and/or consultancy agreements with AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HeartFlow, Opsens, and Novartis. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Up to 25% of embolic strokes occur in individuals without atrial fibrillation (AF) or other identifiable mechanisms., Objectives: This study aims to assess whether left atrial (LA) blood flow characteristics are associated with embolic brain infarcts, independently of AF., Methods: The authors recruited 134 patients: 44 with a history of ischemic stroke and 90 with no history of stroke but CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score ≥1. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluated cardiac function and LA 4-dimensional flow parameters, including velocity and vorticity (a measure of rotational flow), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to detect large noncortical or cortical infarcts (LNCCIs) (likely embolic), or nonembolic lacunar infarcts., Results: Patients (41% female; age 70 ± 9 years) had moderate stroke risk (median CHA 2 DS 2 VASc = 3, Q1-Q3: 2-4). Sixty-eight (51%) had diagnosed AF, of whom 58 (43%) were in AF during CMR. Thirty-nine (29%) had ≥1 LNCCI, 20 (15%) had ≥1 lacunar infarct without LNCCI, and 75 (56%) had no infarct. Lower LA vorticity was significantly associated with prevalent LNCCIs after adjustment for AF during CMR, history of AF, CHA 2 DS 2 VASc score, LA emptying fraction, LA indexed maximum volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, and indexed left ventricular mass (OR: 2.06 [95% CI: 1.08-3.92 per SD]; P = 0.027). By contrast, LA flow peak velocity was not significantly associated with LNCCIs (P = 0.21). No LA parameter was associated with lacunar infarcts (all P > 0.05)., Conclusions: Reduced LA flow vorticity is significantly and independently associated with embolic brain infarcts. Imaging LA flow characteristics may aid identification of individuals who would benefit from anticoagulation for embolic stroke prevention, regardless of heart rhythm., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and by the British Heart Foundation (BHF). Drs Spartera, Pessoa-Amorim, and Wijesurendra are funded by the NIHR Oxford BRC. Drs Ferreira and Casadei are funded by the BHF. Drs Spartera, Hess, and Wijesurendra have received support from the BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford. Dr Spartera has received support from a competitive scholarship for young cardiologists awarded by the Italian Society of Cardiology and funded via MSD Italia–Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. Dr Casadei has received support in kind from Roche Diagnostics (blood assays) and iRhythm (ECG monitors) for clinical studies on atrial fibrillation. Dr Wijesurendra has received travel assistance from Abbott. Dr Harston has received funding from Brainomix Limited. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has effects on the myocardium beyond the immediate infarcted territory. However, pathophysiologic changes in the noninfarcted myocardium and their prognostic implications remain unclear., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term prognostic value of acute changes in both infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium post-STEMI., Methods: Patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention underwent evaluation with blood biomarkers and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 2 days and 6 months, with long-term follow-up for major adverse cardiac events (MACE). A comprehensive CMR protocol included cine, T2-weighted, T2∗, T1-mapping, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Areas without LGE were defined as noninfarcted myocardium. MACE was a composite of cardiac death, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, and new-onset heart failure., Results: Twenty-two of 219 patients (10%) experienced an MACE at a median of 4 years (IQR: 2.5-6.0 years); 152 patients returned for the 6-month visit. High T1 (>1250 ms) in the noninfarcted myocardium was associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (51% ± 8% vs 55% ± 9%; P = 0.002) and higher NT-pro-BNP levels (290 pg/L [IQR: 103-523 pg/L] vs 170 pg/L [IQR: 61-312 pg/L]; P = 0.008) at 6 months and a 2.5-fold (IQR: 1.03-6.20) increased risk of MACE (2.53 [IQR: 1.03-6.22]), compared with patients with normal T1 in the noninfarcted myocardium (P = 0.042). A lower T1 (<1,300 ms) in the infarcted myocardium was associated with increased MACE (3.11 [IQR: 1.19-8.13]; P = 0.020). Both noninfarct and infarct T1 were independent predictors of MACE (both P = 0.001) and significantly improved risk prediction beyond LVEF, infarct size, and microvascular obstruction (C-statistic: 0.67 ± 0.07 vs 0.76 ± 0.06, net-reclassification index: 40% [IQR: 12%-64%]; P = 0.007)., Conclusions: The acute responses post-STEMI in both infarcted and noninfarcted myocardium are independent incremental predictors of long-term MACE. These insights may provide new opportunities for treatment and risk stratification in STEMI., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The OxAMI study is supported by the British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) Oxford (RE/13/1/30181), and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. Dr Shanmuganathan is supported by the Alison Brading Memorial Graduate Scholarship in Medical Science, Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford. Dr Burrage was supported by a BHF Clinical Research Training Fellowship (FS/19/65/34692). Prof Channon is funded by a BHF Chair award (CH/16/1/32013). Prof Ferreira has received support from the BHF, BHF CRE Oxford, and NIHR Oxford BRC. Prof Piechnik and Dr Zhang have received support from the BHF CRE Oxford (RE/18/3/34214). Prof Piechnik has patent authorship rights for U.S. patent 9285446 B2 (systems and methods for Shortened Look-Locker Inversion Recovery [Sh-MOLLI] cardiac gated mapping of T1), granted March 15, 2016; all rights transferred to Siemens Medical. The funders were not involved in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and in the preparation, review, or approval of the paper. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

COVID-19 is associated with myocardial injury caused by ischemia, inflammation, or myocarditis. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the noninvasive reference standard for cardiac function, structure, and tissue composition. CMR is a potentially valuable diagnostic tool in patients with COVID-19 presenting with myocardial injury and evidence of cardiac dysfunction. Although COVID-19-related myocarditis is likely infrequent, COVID-19-related cardiovascular histopathology findings have been reported in up to 48% of patients, raising the concern for long-term myocardial injury. Studies to date report CMR abnormalities in 26% to 60% of hospitalized patients who have recovered from COVID-19, including functional impairment, myocardial tissue abnormalities, late gadolinium enhancement, or pericardial abnormalities. In athletes post-COVID-19, CMR has detected myocarditis-like abnormalities. In children, multisystem inflammatory syndrome may occur 2 to 6 weeks after infection; associated myocarditis and coronary artery aneurysms are evaluable by CMR. At this time, our understanding of COVID-19-related cardiovascular involvement is incomplete, and multiple studies are planned to evaluate patients with COVID-19 using CMR. In this review, we summarize existing studies of CMR for patients with COVID-19 and present ongoing research. We also provide recommendations for clinical use of CMR for patients with acute symptoms or who are recovering from COVID-19., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Petersen provides consultancy to and is a shareholder of Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Inc, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Dr Friedrich is board member, shareholder, and consultant of Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc. Dr Kramer is a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Nagel has received research support from Bayer AG, Neosoft, and Medis. Dr Pennell has received research support from Siemens. Dr Bluemke is a consultant to Bayer AG. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose. Dr Petersen has received support from the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Barts. Dr Ferreira receives support from the British Heart Foundation, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford, and the National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Dr Raisi-Estabragh was supported by British Heart Foundation Clinical Research Training Fellowship number FS/17/81/33318., (Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the long-term prognostic implications of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) when assessed with both cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI)., Background: Post-ischemic CMD can be assessed using the pressure-wire based IMR and/or by the presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO) on CMR., Methods: A total of 198 patients with STEMI underwent IMR and MVO assessment. Patients were classified as follows: Group 1, no significant CMD (low IMR [≤40 U] and no MVO); Group 2, CMD with either high IMR (>40 U) or MVO; Group 3, CMD with both IMR >40 U and MVO. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, diagnosis of new heart failure, cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, and cardioverter defibrillator implantation., Results: CMD with both high IMR and MVO was present in 23.7% of the cases (Group 3) and CMD with either high IMR or MVO was observed in 40.9% of cases (Group 2). At a median follow-up of 40.1 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 34 (17%) cases. At 1 year of follow-up, Group 3 (hazard ratio [HR]: 12.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6 to 100.6; p = 0.017) but not Group 2 (HR: 7.2; 95% CI: 0.9 to 57.9; p = 0.062) had worse clinical outcomes compared with those with no significant CMD in Group 1. However, in the long-term, patients in Group 2 (HR: 4.2; 95% CI: 1.4 to 12.5; p = 0.009) and those in Group 3 (HR: 5.2; 95% CI: 1.7 to 16.2; p = 0.004) showed similar adverse outcomes, mainly driven by the occurrence of heart failure., Conclusions: Post-ischemic CMD predicts a more than 4-fold increase in long-term risk of adverse outcomes, mainly driven by the occurrence of heart failure. Defining CMD by either invasive IMR >40 U or by CMR-assessed MVO showed similar risk of adverse outcomes., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Supported by British Heart Foundation (grant CH/16/1/32013) BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford (RG/13/1/30181), the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. Dr. Shanmuganathan was funded by the Alison Brading Memorial Scholarship in Medical Science, Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Myocardial fibrosis, either focal or diffuse, is a common feature of many cardiac diseases and is associated with a poor prognosis for major adverse cardiovascular events. Although histological analysis remains the gold standard for confirming the presence of myocardial fibrosis, endomyocardial biopsy is invasive, has sampling errors, and is not practical in the routine clinical setting. Cardiac imaging modalities offer noninvasive surrogate biomarkers not only for fibrosis but also for myocardial edema and infiltration to varying degrees, and have important roles in the diagnosis and management of cardiac diseases. This review summarizes important pathophysiological features in the development of commonly encountered cardiac diseases, and the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of various cardiac imaging modalities (echocardiography, single-photon emission computer tomography, positron emission tomography, multidetector computer tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance) for myocardial tissue characterization, with an emphasis on imaging focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of T1 mapping at rest and during adenosine stress as a novel method for ischemia detection without the use of gadolinium contrast., Background: In chronic coronary artery disease (CAD), accurate detection of ischemia is important because targeted revascularization improves clinical outcomes. Myocardial blood volume (MBV) may be a more comprehensive marker of ischemia than myocardial blood flow. T1 mapping using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is highly sensitive to changes in myocardial water content, including MBV. We propose that T1 mapping at rest and during adenosine vasodilatory stress can detect MBV changes in normal and diseased myocardium in CAD., Methods: Twenty normal controls (10 at 1.5-T; 10 at 3.0-T) and 10 CAD patients (1.5-T) underwent conventional CMR to assess for left ventricular function (cine), infarction (late gadolinium enhancement [LGE]) and ischemia (myocardial perfusion reserve index [MPRI] on first-pass perfusion imaging during adenosine stress). These were compared to novel pre-contrast stress/rest T1 mapping using the Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery technique, which is heart rate independent. T1 values were derived for normal myocardium in controls and for infarcted, ischemic, and remote myocardium in CAD patients., Results: Normal myocardium in controls (normal wall motion, MPRI, no LGE) showed normal resting T1 (954 ± 19 ms at 1.5-T; 1,189 ± 34 ms at 3.0-T) and significant positive T1 reactivity during adenosine stress compared to baseline (6.2 ± 0.5% at 1.5-T; 6.3 ± 1.1% at 3.0-T; all p < 0.0001). Infarcted myocardium showed the highest resting T1 of all tissue classes (1,442 ± 84 ms), without significant T1 reactivity (0.2 ± 1.5%). Ischemic myocardium showed elevated resting T1 compared to normal (987 ± 17 ms; p < 0.001) without significant T1 reactivity (0.2 ± 0.8%). Remote myocardium, although having comparable resting T1 to normal (955 ± 17 ms; p = 0.92), showed blunted T1 reactivity (3.9 ± 0.6%; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: T1 mapping at rest and during adenosine stress can differentiate between normal, infarcted, ischemic, and remote myocardium with distinctive T1 profiles. Stress/rest T1 mapping holds promise for ischemia detection without the need for gadolinium contrast., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the diffuse myocardial fibrosis and edema in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and the association of myocardial T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) with disease activity, duration, and cardiac function., Background: RA is a connective tissue disorder, with frequent cardiovascular disease. Myocardial inflammation and diffuse fibrosis can be detected noninvasively by using native T1 mapping and ECV quantification on CMR., Methods: Thirty-nine RA patients (28 women; mean age 50 ± 12 years) and 39 matched control subjects (28 women; mean age 49 ± 12 years) underwent CMR at 1.5-T, including cine, tagging, T2-weighted, native T1 mapping (shortened modified Look-Locker inversion recovery), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and ECV imaging., Results: Focal fibrosis on LGE was found in 46% of RA patients compared with none of the control subjects. Patients with RA had larger areas of focal myocardial edema (10% vs. 0%), higher native T1 values (973 ± 27 ms vs. 961 ± 18 ms; p = 0.03), larger areas of involvement as detected by native T1 >990 ms (35% vs. 2%; p < 0.001), and expansion of ECV (30.3 ± 3.4% vs. 27.9 ± 2.0%; p < 0.001) compared with control subjects. Left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction were similar between RA patients and control subjects. Peak systolic circumferential strain (-16.9 ± 1.3 vs. -18.7 ± 1.2; p < 0.001) and peak diastolic circumferential strain rate (83 ± 21 s(-1) vs. 112 ± 20 s(-1); p < 0.001) were impaired in RA patients. Myocardial T1 and ECV were correlated with myocardial strain and RA disease activity., Conclusions: Subclinical cardiovascular disease is frequent in RA, including focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis and inflammation, which are associated with impaired strain and RA disease activity. CMR T1 mapping provides potential added value as a biomarker for disease monitoring and study of therapies aimed at reducing diffuse myocardial fibrosis in RA., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to test the diagnostic performance of native T1 mapping in acute myocarditis compared with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) techniques such as dark-blood T2-weighted (T2W)-CMR, bright-blood T2W-CMR, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging., Background: The diagnosis of acute myocarditis on CMR often requires multiple techniques, including T2W, early gadolinium enhancement, and LGE imaging. Novel techniques such as T1 mapping and bright-blood T2W-CMR are also sensitive to changes in free water content. We hypothesized that these techniques can serve as new and potentially superior diagnostic criteria for myocarditis., Methods: We investigated 50 patients with suspected acute myocarditis (age 42 ± 16 years; 22% women) and 45 controls (age 42 ± 14 years; 22% women). CMR at 1.5-T (median 3 days from presentation) included: 1) dark-blood T2W-CMR (short-tau inversion recovery); 2) bright-blood T2W-CMR (acquisition for cardiac unified T2 edema); 3) native T1 mapping (shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery); and 4) LGE. Image analysis included: 1) global T2 signal intensity ratio of myocardium compared with skeletal muscle; 2) myocardial T1 relaxation times; and 3) areas of LGE., Results: Compared with controls, patients had significantly higher global T2 signal intensity ratios by dark-blood T2W-CMR (1.73 ± 0.27 vs. 1.56 ± 0.15, p < 0.01), bright-blood T2W-CMR (2.02 ± 0.33 vs. 1.84 ± 0.17, p < 0.01), and mean myocardial T1 (1,010 ± 65 ms vs. 941 ± 18 ms, p < 0.01). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed clear differences in diagnostic performance. The areas under the curve for each method were: T1 mapping (0.95), LGE (0.96), dark-blood T2 (0.78), and bright-blood T2 (0.76). A T1 cutoff of 990 ms had a sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of 90%, 91%, and 91%, respectively., Conclusions: Native T1 mapping as a novel criterion for the detection of acute myocarditis showed excellent and superior diagnostic performance compared with T2W-CMR. It also has a higher sensitivity compared with T2W and LGE techniques, which may be especially useful in detecting subtle focal disease and when gadolinium contrast imaging is not feasible., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: This study sought to explore the potential role of noncontrast myocardial T1 mapping for detection of cardiac involvement in patients with primary amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis., Background: Cardiac involvement carries a poor prognosis in systemic AL amyloidosis. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is useful for the detection of cardiac amyloid, but characteristic LGE patterns do not always occur or they appear late in the disease. Noncontrast characterization of amyloidotic myocardium with T1 mapping may improve disease detection. Furthermore, quantitative assessment of myocardial amyloid load would be of great value., Methods: Fifty-three AL amyloidosis patients (14 with no cardiac involvement, 11 with possible involvement, and 28 with definite cardiac involvement based on standard biomarker and echocardiographic criteria) underwent CMR (1.5-T) including noncontrast T1 mapping (shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery [ShMOLLI] sequence) and LGE imaging. These were compared with 36 healthy volunteers and 17 patients with aortic stenosis and a comparable degree of left ventricular hypertrophy as the cardiac amyloid patients., Results: Myocardial T1 was significantly elevated in cardiac AL amyloidosis patients (1,140 ± 61 ms) compared to normal subjects (958 ± 20 ms, p < 0.001) and patients with aortic stenosis (979 ± 51 ms, p < 0.001). Myocardial T1 was increased in AL amyloid even when cardiac involvement was uncertain (1,048 ± 48 ms) or thought absent (1,009 ± 31 ms). A noncontrast myocardial T1 cutoff of 1,020 ms yielded 92% accuracy for identifying amyloid patients with possible or definite cardiac involvement. In the AL amyloidosis cohort, there were significant correlations between myocardial T1 time and indices of systolic and diastolic dysfunction., Conclusions: Noncontrast T1 mapping has high diagnostic accuracy for detecting cardiac AL amyloidosis, correlates well with markers of systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and is potentially more sensitive for detecting early disease than LGE imaging. Elevated myocardial T1 may represent a direct marker of cardiac amyloid load. Further studies are needed to assess the prognostic significance of T1 elevation., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)