Search

Objectives This study sought to investigate the substrate, procedural strategies, safety, and outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR). Background VT ablation in patients with AVR is challenging, particularly when mapping and ablation in the periaortic region are necessary. Methods We identified consecutive patients with mechanical, bioprosthetic, and transcatheter AVR who underwent CA for VT refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs and analyzed VT substrate, approach to LV access, complications, and long-term outcomes. Results Overall, 29 patients (87% men, mean age 67.9 ± 9.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 39 ± 10%) with prior AVR (13 mechanical, 15 bioprosthetic, 1 transcatheter AVR) underwent 40 ablations from 2004 to 2016. Left-sided mapping/CA was performed in 27 patients (36 procedures). Access was retrograde aortic in 11 procedures (all bioprosthetic), transseptal in 24 (13 mechanical; 10 bioprosthetic; 1 transcatheter AVR), or transventricular septal in 1. Periaortic bipolar or unipolar scar was detected in all 24 patients in whom detailed periaortic mapping was performed. Clinical VT circuit(s) involved the periaortic region in 10 patients (34%), 2 (7%) had bundle branch re-entry VT, and 17 (59%) had substrate unrelated to AVR. There were 2 major complications (both related to vascular access). Only 2 patients (9.1%) had VT recurrence. Over median follow-up of 12.8 months, 11 patients died (none as a result of recurrent VT). Conclusions Whereas most patients undergoing CA for VT after AVR had VT from substrate unrelated to AVR, periaortic scar is universally present and bundle branch re-entry can be the VT mechanism. CA can be safely performed with excellent long-term VT elimination.

Objectives This study reports outcomes of bailout atrial balloon septoplasty (ABS) to overcome challenging left atrial (LA) access in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Background Transseptal puncture (TSP) and LA access for AF ablation can be challenging in patients with prior atrial septal surgery, percutaneous closure, or scarred septum due to multiple prior TSPs. Methods The study identified patients who underwent AF ablation at 2 ablation centers from 2011 to 2017 with challenging TSP in whom bailout percutaneous ABS was performed to allow LA access. Following TSP, the transseptal sheath could not be advanced to the LA despite multiple attempts or approaches including use of a stiff wire sequentially in the left and right pulmonary veins, use of a stiff pigtail exchange wire advanced in the LA or left ventricle, or sequential dilation with progressively larger diameter long dilators. ABS was performed using a noncompliant balloon (diameter 4 to 10 mm) advanced over a stiff wire deployed in the left superior pulmonary vein, allowing passage of the transseptal sheaths for completion of the AF ablation procedure. Results Fifteen patients (mean age 54.4 ± 15.5 years, 9 women) with challenging TSP (7 patients with prior surgical ASD repair, 2 with percutaneous ASD closure devices, and 13 with ≥1 previous TSP) underwent bailout ABS for AF ablation. After TSP (radiofrequency assisted in 10 cases), ABS was successful and permitted access to the LA for ablation in all patients. Mean time required to perform ABS was 21.3 ± 19.4 min, and mean total procedure time was 241.1 ± 114.6 min (fluoroscopy time 62.0 ± 29.9 min). There were no procedural complications. Conclusions In patients undergoing AF ablation with difficult transseptal access due to scarred, surgically, or percutaneously repaired atrial septum, ABS is a safe and effective bailout strategy to obtain transseptal access.

Objectives This was a meta-analysis of published studies to examine the impact of early referral on outcomes after catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease. Background Patients are frequently referred for VT ablation after failure of antiarrhythmic drugs to control VT. Some studies have suggested that early referral might confer better outcomes. Methods An electronic search was performed using major databases. The primary outcomes were long-term VT recurrence and total mortality. Secondary outcomes were acute procedural success and acute complications. Results Three studies were included with a total of 980 patients (mean age 64 ± 12 years, 71% males). Mean follow-up was 29 ± 27 months. Early referral for VT ablation was associated with decreased VT recurrence and acute complications compared with late referral (relative risk: 0.69 [95% confidence interval: 0.58 to 0.82], p Conclusions Late referral for VT ablation was associated with worse outcomes (VT recurrence and acute complications) in patients with structural heart disease, which suggests that early referral for VT ablation might be a reasonable consideration in this patient population.

A 64-year-old woman with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome and ventricular fibrillation being treated with nadolol was evaluated for shortness of breath. A dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (device model CD2207-36Q; ventricular lead model 7122Q/58; and atrial lead model 1688TC/52