Search

Background: Mental health is becoming increasingly important in patient outcomes. The patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) was developed by the NIH to collect outcome data in rapid dynamic fashion on electronic platforms. The potential role of PROMIS in monitoring young total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients is under-investigated. The purpose of this study is to investigate correlations between PROMIS Depression or Anxiety with SF-12 mental component score., Methods: We identified 223 hips (200 patients) who underwent primary THA over a 30-month period at a single institution. Patients without preoperative PROMIS or SF-12 mental scores, or >50yo were excluded. All data was collected preoperatively and included age, sex, BMI, ASA, PROMIS Depression, PROMIS Anxiety, and SF-12 Mental component score. We considered floor and ceiling effects as significant if >15% of patients responded with the lowest or highest possible score, respectively. Relationships between SF-12 and PROMIS were investigated using correlation (R), and were considered strong if R>0.7., Results: Mean age was 41-years-old, mean ASA category was 2, mean BMI was 30kg/m2, and 54% were female. None of the PROMs showed any floor/ceiling effects at baseline. PROMIS Depression showed a strong correlation to SF-12 Mental (R=-0.72) while PROMIS Anxiety showed a moderate correlation to SF-12 Mental (R=-0.58). Negative linear relationships were observed because a lower PROMIS Depression/Anxiety values indicates less depressive/anxious feelings (inverse of SF-12)., Conclusion: PROMIS Anxiety and Depression correlate well with SF-12 mental. These PROMIS domains may be attractive alternatives to legacy mental health instruments in young THA patients. Level of Evidence: III ., (Copyright © The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2022.)

Background: Hip microinstability remains poorly-defined but increasingly diagnosed in the setting of borderline dysplasia (LCEA 20-25°), soft tissue laxity, or following unrepaired arthroscopic capsulotomy. While hip microinstability is com-monly treated with arthroscopic capsular plication with short-term outcomes reported, this procedure has been performed open for some time. The purpose of current study was to assess the durability of outcomes of combined arthroscopy and open capsular plication in treating symptomatic hip microinstability at mid-term follow-up., Methods: We retrospectively identified hips that underwent combined hip arthroscopy and open capsular plication for symptomatic microinstability between 2008 and 2013. Hips with excessive femoral anteversion (femoral version >35°) or classic acetabular dysplasia (LCEA <20°) were treated with bony reorientation and were not included in the current study. Patient reported outcomes scores were collected preoperatively and at a minimum five year follow-up. Hips that required reoperation or did not meet criteria for minimally clinically important difference (MCID, ≥8 increase in mHHS) or patient acceptable symptom scores (PASS, mHHS) were considered failures., Results: A total of 27 hips met criteria for inclusion and follow-up was obtained for 22 hips (81.5%) at a mean of 7.1 years. All patients were female with a mean age of 25.9 years and 7 (32%) hips had previous surgery. Patients undergoing the combined procedure improved from a mean baseline mHHS of 55.3±13 to a mean follow-up mHHS of 74.5±20.9 (p<0.001). At midterm follow-up, 54.5% of hips met criteria for PASS and 68.2% of hips met criteria for MCID, with 72.7% of hips meeting criteria for either MCID or PASS. Overall, 10 hips (45%) were considered failures with 6 hips (27%) requiring reoperation and an additional 4 hips (18%) with clinical failure. Hips without previous surgery had a failure rate of 33.3% (5/15) while 71.4% (5/7) of those with previous surgery failed (P=.09)., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates a high (45%) rate of reoperations and persistent symptoms in hips with microinstability treated with combined arthroscopy and open capsular plication. Further mid- and long-term studies evaluating soft tissue plication are needed, as well as comparisons with bony procedures in the setting of microinstability are needed. Level of Evidence: III ., Competing Interests: Disclosures: JJN reports personal fees from Responsive Arthroscopy LLC and Smith+Nephew, Inc; Research support from Stryker and Zimmer Biomet. JRR reports personal fees for Smith+Nephew, Inc. JCC reports personal fees for Wolters Kluwer Health, Microport Orthopedics, and Zimmer Biomet; Research support from Stryker, Zimmer Biomet, Department of Defense. The remaining authors report no potential conflicts of interest related to this study., (Copyright © The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2021.)