Search

Rationale and Objectives: The authors compared a solid-state amorphous silicon (a-Si) detector and screen-film radiography (SFR) with regard to the detection of simulated pulmonary lesions. Evaluation of the impact of a dose reduction of 50% with this digital flat-panel detector was of special interest., Methods: A self-scanning flat-panel detector, based on a-Si technology with 143 x 143 microm pixel size, 1 k x 1 k matrix and 12-bit digital output was used. An asymmetric state-of-the-art screen-film system was compared with a-Si images taken at the same dose as SFR-images and at a dose reduced by 50%. An anthropomorphic chest phantom was superimposed by templates containing nodules, linear structures, reticular, and micronodular opacities in a random distribution. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for 23,040 observations made by four independent observers. Student's t test (95% confidence-level) was used for statistical analysis., Results: Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a-Si images taken at the same dose as SFR-images were significantly superior to SFR with respect to the detectability of lines (P = 0.01) and micronodular opacities (P < 0.01). For the other objects and the a-Si images taken at a reduced dose, it yielded no statistically significant differences between both imaging modalities., Conclusions: The results of this phantom study indicate that a-Si detector technology holds promise in terms of dose reduction in chest radiography without loss of diagnostic accuracy compared with SFR.

Rationale and Objectives: The purpose of this phantom study was to assess the diagnostic performance of a self-scanning, solid-state amorphous silicon (a-Si) detector in skeletal radiography using different exposure parameters., Methods: A flat-panel detector (15 cm x 15 cm), based on a-Si technology with 143 microm x 143 microm pixel size, 1k x 1k matrix, and 12 bit digital output was used. State-of-the-art screen-film radiography (SFR; speed 400, detector dose 2.5 microGy) was compared with a-Si images taken at doses that were equivalent to a speed of 400, 800, 1,250, and 1,600, respectively. A total of 232 segments of long tubular deer-bones (femur, tibia, humerus, radius) had 110 artificial fractures and 112 cortical defects simulating osteolytic lesions. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for 9,280 observations made by four independent observers. Two-tailed Student's paired t test was used for statistical analysis (95% confidence level)., Results: Receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded equivalent results of the a-Si and SFR system. Even at the lowest dose there were no statistically significant differences between both imaging modalities with respect to the detectability of fractures and cortical defects., Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that a-Si detector technology holds promise in terms of dose reduction in skeletal radiography without loss of diagnostic accuracy.

Rationale and Objectives: The authors evaluate a new flat-panel x-ray detector (FD) with respect to foreign body detection and reduction of radiation dose compared with screen-film radiography., Methods: Flat-panel x-ray detector is based on amorphous silicon technology and uses a 1 k x 1 k photo-detector matrix with a pixel size of 143 x 143 microns and 12-bit digital output. A thallium-dotted cesium iodide scintillation layer converts x-rays into light. An ex vivo experimental model was used to determine the detectability of foreign bodies. Foreign bodies with varying sizes were examined: glass with and without addition of lead, bone, aluminium, iron, copper, gravel fragments, and graphite. Four hundred observation fields were examined using conventional radiography (speed, 400; system dose: 2.5 microGy) as well as FD with a simulated speed of 400, 800, 1200, and 1600, corresponding to a detector dose of 2.5 microGy, 1.25 microGy, 0.87 microGy, and 0.625 microGy, respectively. Four independent radiologists performed receiver operating characteristic analysis of 8000 observations., Results: Flat-panel x-ray detector with a simulated speed of 400 was significantly superior (P = 0.012) to screen-film radiography (speed, 400). At a simulated speed of 800 and 1200 FD yielded results equivalent to screen-film radiography. Flat-panel x-ray detector was significantly inferior to screen-film radiography at a simulated speed of 1600 (P = 0.012)., Conclusions: Flat-panel x-ray detector technology allows significant reduction in radiation dose compared with screen-film radiography without loss of diagnostic accuracy.