Search

Background and Objective: Osimertinib as first-line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutations remains controversial. Sequential EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) might be superior to the first line osimertinib in patients at risk of developing acquired T790M mutations., Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients with EGFR-mutated (deletion 19 or L858R) advanced NSCLC treated with first-line drugs and evaluated predictive markers using classification and regression tree (CART) for the detection of T790M mutations based on patient backgrounds prior to initial treatment., Results: Patients without acquired T790M mutations had worse outcomes than those with T790M mutations (median OS: 798 days vs. not reached; HR: 2.70; P < 0.001). CART identified three distinct groups based on variables associated with acquired T790M mutations (age, CYF, WBC, liver metastasis, and LDH; AUROC: 0.77). Based on certain variables, CART identified three distinct groups in deletion 19 (albumin, LDH, bone metastasis, pleural effusion, and WBC; AUROC: 0.81) and two distinct groups in L858R (age, CEA, and ALP; AUROC: 0.80). The T790M detection frequencies after TKI resistance of afatinib and first-generation EGFR-TKIs were similar (35.3% vs. 37.4%, P = 0.933). Afatinib demonstrated longer PFS (398 vs. 279 days; HR: 0.67; P = 0.004) and OS (1053 vs. 956 days; HR: 0.68; P = 0.051) than first-generation EGFR-TKIs., Conclusion: Identification of patients at risk of acquiring T790M mutations after EGFR-TKI failure may aid in choice of first-line EGFR-TKI. Furthermore, afatinib may be the more effective 1st-line EGFR-TKI treatment for patients at risk of developing T790M as initial EGFR-TKI resistance., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives Vascular endothelial growth factor plays an important role in the pathogenesis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). We previously showed the efficacy of bevacizumab (Bev) plus carboplatin (CBDCA)/paclitaxel (PTX) in the treatment of non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC) with MPE. However, the toxicities were a little severe, and the efficacy was not satisfied sufficiently. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study for NSCLC with MPE to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bev plus CBDCA/nab-PTX, which is a new combination therapy. Methods Chemotherapy-naive non-squamous (SQ) NSCLC patients with MPE participated in the study. A single aspiration (not allowing chest tube drainage) was allowed before chemotherapy. Patients received a maximum of six cycles of Bev (15 mg/kg, day1) plus CBDCA (AUC 6, day1)/nab-PTX (100 mg/m 2 , day1, 8) every 3 weeks followed by Bev (15 mg/kg, day1) plus nab-PTX (100 mg/m 2 , day1, 8) every 3 weeks without disease progression or unacceptable severe toxicities. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results The study enrollment was ceased because of suspension of the registration period (as scheduled) after 12 of 20 planned patients were treated successfully between March 2014 and February 2018. The ORR was 58.3 % (95 % CI, 27.7-84.8 %), and the disease control rate was 100 % (95 % CI, 73.5-100 %). Eight patients received maintenance therapy. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 14.4 and 26.9 months, respectively. Most patients experienced hematological toxicities, including ≥ grade 3 neutropenia and anemia; none experienced severe bleeding events and grade 5 toxicities. Conclusion The combination of Bev plus CBDCA/nab-PTX, a novel combination, might have efficacy with acceptable toxicities in chemotherapy-naïve non-SQ NSCLC patients with MPE.Trial Registration University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (No. UMIN000013329) registered on 4th March 2014., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.)

Background Osimertinib is one of the first-line treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, the occurrence rate of osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) is particularly high in Japanese patients and little information on subsequent cancer treatment options after recovery from osimertinib-induced ILD is currently available. Thus, this study aims to determine the safety and efficacy of afatinib for the treatment of NSCLC following osimertinib-induced ILD. Methods We retrospectively investigated the clinical courses of all NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations at our facility between August 2018 and September 2019, who received osimertinib as first-line treatment and were subsequently treated with afatinib after developing osimertinib-induced ILD. Results Forty-two patients received osimertinib treatment at our facility during the study period, and four patients received afatinib after developing osimertinib-induced ILD. All events of ILD improved either spontaneously or with steroid therapy before the initiation of afatinib. For the four patients who were retrospectively reviewed, the overall response rate to afatinib therapy was 75%, and the disease control rate was 100%. During the study period, no ILD recurrence was observed in any of the four patients. Conclusions According to our study findings, afatinib treatment after osimertinib-induced ILD is considered safe and effective and it can be used as one of the treatment options for NSCLC following osimertinib-induced ILD.

Associations between treatment outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors and metastatic sites in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not well known. Therefore, this multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of metastatic sites after first-line pembrolizumab treatment for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. We retrospectively analyzed advanced NSCLC patients with a PD-L1 TPS ≥50% who underwent first-line pembrolizumab therapy at 11 institutions between February 2017 and April 2018. Clinical data collected from medical records included metastatic sites at the time of pembrolizumab treatment. Treatment outcomes of pembrolizumab were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. In total, 213 patients were included in the study. The median age was 71 years (range 39-91 years). Of the 213 patients, 176 (83%) were men and 172 (81%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) score of 0-1. The most common metastases were thoracic lymph node metastasis (77%), intrapulmonary metastasis (31%), bone metastasis (28%), and malignant pleural effusion (26%). On multivariate analysis, a poor ECOG-PS score (hazard ratio: 1.95, 95.0% confidence interval: 1.25-3.04; P = 0.003) and malignant pleural effusion (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95.0% confidence interval: 1.01-2.29; P = 0.043) were independent predictors of shorter progression-free survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab. For NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion, pembrolizumab monotherapy is not a suitable first-line treatment because of its insufficient effectiveness, even though their PD-L1 TPS was high.

Objectives As first line therapy, pembrolizumab provides longer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than platinum doublets in programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with tumor propensity scores (TPS) ≥50%. However, clinical trials do not represent real-world patients. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective study conducted across 11 medical centers in Japan analyzed clinical data from patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab for NSCLC between February 1, 2017 and April 30, 2018. The efficacy, safety, and suitability of pembrolizumab monotherapy were evaluated. Results The median age of the 213 enrolled patients was 71 (range: 39-91) years. Among them, 176 (82.6%) were male, 20 (9.4%) were never smokers (median Brinkman index: 900), 172 (80.8%) had an ECOG PS of 0-1, 55 (25.8%) had squamous-cell carcinoma (SQ). PD-L1 TPS were 50-74%, 75-89%, and 90-100% in 97 (45.5%), 47 (22.1%), and 69 (32.4%) patients, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) of grades ≥3 were observed in 39 (18.3%) patients. Pneumonitis was the most common severe AE, occurring in 10 patients (4.7%) including 1 with grade 4 toxicity; no severe AE-related deaths occurred. The overall response rate, median PFS, and median OS was 51.2%, 8.3 months, and 17.8 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS (0-1 vs. ≥2: HR: 1.69, 95.0% CI: 1.05-2.72; p = 0.03138), CRP/Alb (<0.3 vs. ≥0.3: HR: 1.92, 95.0% CI: 1.28-2.87; p = 0.00153), steroid usage (not usage vs. usage: HR: 2.94, 95.0% CI: 1.45-5.95; p = 0.00267), and PD-L1 TPS (50-89% vs. 90-100%: HR: 0.65, 95.0% CI: 0.43-1.00; p = 0.04984) were significantly and independently correlated with PFS of pembrolizumab. Conclusion The results confirm the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in real-world patients. Poor PS and steroid usage at the time of commencing pembrolizumab treatment indicate poor outcomes. First-line pembrolizumab particularly benefits patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥90% or low inflammatory states (CRP/ALB<0.3).

Background Bevacizumab (Bev) is generally well-tolerated, and Bev-associated intestinal perforation (BAP) is a rare albeit serious side effect in cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, the present study aimed to identify clinical predictors of BAP to help predict and manage the development of life-threatening intestinal complications among patients receiving Bev. Methods This retrospective study evaluated demographic, clinical, and treatment factors for patients with NSCLC who were treated with Bev between February 2010 and August 2015 at our center. Results We identified 314 regimens (208 patients; median age: 65 years; 115 women) for analysis, which included 119 first-line regimens, 74 s-line regimens, and 121 third-line or later regimens. BAP occurred in 7 cases (2.23% among all regimens and 3.37% among all patients), which generally occurred during first- or second-line treatment and was caused by ulcerative colitis (1 case), colon diverticulitis (1 case), and idiopathic perforations (5 cases). Univariate analyses revealed that BAP was significantly associated with deteriorating PS during the first cycle of chemotherapy (odd ratio [OR]: 11.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.37-51.63, p = 0.0022), grade ≥ 3 diarrhea (OR: 11.37, 95% CI: 2.37-54.50, p = 0.0024), febrile neutropenia (OR: 9.16, 95% CI: 1.98-42.49, p = 0.0047), and stomatitis (OR: 4.60, 95% CI: 1.01-21.04, p = 0.0492). Conclusions Among patients with NSCLC, BAP was associated with deteriorating PS during the first cycle of chemotherapy, grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and stomatitis. Therefore, careful observation is needed for patients with NSCLC who receive Bev in any line of treatment, especially if they develop serious side effects that affect their PS or mucous membrane.

Background Cisplatin and pemetrexed are very effective against advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR mutations. Erlotinib plus bevacizumab are highly effective against advanced NSCLCs with activating EGFR mutations. We performed this phase I 'Quartet Trial' to determine the safety and efficacy of all 4 agents as a first-line treatment for non-squamous NSCLC patients harboring activating EGFR mutations. Patients and Methods Patients received escalating quartet-agent doses every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. We examined the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD). Results Ten patients (3 men and 7 women) with a median age of 69 years were enrolled. Four and 6 patients had exon 19 and 21 mutations, respectively; 8 received maintenance therapy without unexpected or cumulative toxicities. One of 6 patients experienced grade 3 vagal reflex at 60 mg/m 2 cisplatin plus 500 mg/m 2 pemetrexed with 150 mg erlotinib and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab, which was designated the RD. Four patients experienced no DLT with 75 mg/m 2 cisplatin plus 500 mg/m 2 pemetrexed with 150 mg erlotinib and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab (designated the MTD); however, 3 underwent dose reduction due to severe toxicities (grade 3 gastrointestinal hemorrhage, skin rash, nausea, and febrile neutropenia) during induction chemotherapy. The most frequent DLT-phase adverse events were nausea, anorexia, and fatigue. The overall response rate was 100%. Furthermore, the progression-free and overall survival rates were 17.9 and 32.0 months, respectively. Conclusions This quartet chemotherapy regimen was tolerable and effective in our patient population (UMIN000012536).

Introduction: This study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed and carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed in chemo-naïve patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: A total of 109 patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the curve = 6 mg/mL·min) every 21 days. For patients without disease progression after 4 cycles, pemetrexed was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pre-planned subgroup analysis results based on the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are also presented., Results: The median number of treatment cycles was 5 (range: 1-30) in the entire study period. Most of the grade ≥ 3 toxicities observed were hematologic in nature, with no increase in the relative incidence associated with continuation maintenance therapy with pemetrexed. Among the 106 total patients assessable for efficacy, the objective response rate was 35.8 %, median progression free survival (PFS) 5.7 months, and median overall survival (OS) 20.2 months. Sixty patients received maintenance pemetrexed (median: 4 cycles, range: 1-26 cycles); median PFS from the beginning of induction treatment was 7.5 months. From the subgroup analysis for EGFR mutation status, the median OS of EGFR wild-type patients (n=61) was 20.2 months., Conclusions: Pemetrexed/carboplatin followed by pemetrexed was well tolerated and active for front-line treatment of advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Encouraging survival outcomes were observed even in EGFR-wild type patients.

Objective: The objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of panobinostat (LBH589) when administered as a single agent to adult patients with advanced solid tumors or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma whose disease had progressed despite standard therapy or for whom no standard therapy existed., Methods: Panobinostat was administered orally once daily on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday of each week. A total of 13 patients were treated with one of three initial doses: 10 mg (n = 3), 15 mg (n = 4), or 20 mg (n = 6)., Results: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 12 evaluable patients. The most frequently reported adverse events, regardless of whether they were related to the study drug, were diarrhea and nausea in 10 patients (76.9%). Thrombocytopenia was reported in 12 of 13 patients (92.3%). Five of 11 patients (45.4%) had stable disease., Conclusion: Panobinostat administered orally once daily on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday of each week was well tolerated at doses up to 20 mg in Japanese patients. Dose escalation did not proceed after exploration of the 20 mg dose due to emerging global clinical data at that time.

(E)-2'-deoxy-2'-(fluoromethylene)cytidine (FMdC), one of the most potent inhibitors of ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase, was selected for clinical development because of its novel mechanisms of action, and strong antitumor activity against experimental tumor models. This study was designed to determine the toxicities, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetic profile of FMdC. FMdC was given orally for 5 consecutive days every 3 or 4 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. The starting dose was 8 mg/m2/day. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out on days 1 through 5 of the first cycle. Ten patients with non-small cell lung cancer received 15 courses of FMdC at doses which were de-escalated from 8 mg/m2/day to 2 mg/m2/day because of unexpected severe toxicities at the starting dose level. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Thrombocytopenia and anemia were mild. Flu-like symptoms and fever were the common non-hematologic toxicities. The MTD was 4 mg/m2/day, since four of six patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia. At the 4 mg/m2/day dose level, the mean terminal half-life, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), plasma clearance, and mean residence time on day 1 were 3.20 h, 15.8 ng/ml, 2.91 l/h/kg, and 4.03 h, respectively. The recommended dose for phase II studies with this schedule is also 4 mg/m2/day for 5 days. Further investigations are necessary to establish optimal dosing schedules and routes for the administration of FMdC.