Search

Purpose We previously reported the phase I dose escalation study of buparlisib, a pan-class 1A PI3K inhibitor, combined with platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. The combination was well tolerated and promising preliminary efficacy was observed in PTEN deficient tumors. This phase I dose expansion study now evaluates buparlisib plus high dose carboplatin and paclitaxel in unselected patients with advanced solid tumors and buparlisib plus standard dose carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with PTEN deficient tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01297452). Methods There were two expansion cohorts: Cohort A received continuous buparlisib (100 mg/daily) orally plus high dose carboplatin AUC 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2; Cohort B treated patients with PTEN deficient tumors only and they received the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of continuous buparlisib (100 mg/daily) orally plus standard dose carboplatin AUC 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2. Both cohorts received chemotherapy intravenously on day 1 of the 21-day cycle with pegfilgrastim support. Primary endpoint in Cohort A was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of chemotherapy dose intensification with buparlisib and in Cohort B was to describe preliminary efficacy of the combination among patients with tumors harboring a PTEN mutation or homozygous deletion. Results 14 subjects were enrolled, 7 in Cohort A and 7 in Cohort B. Dose reductions were required in 5 (71%) and 3 (43%) patients, in cohort A and B respectively. Grade 3 adverse events in Cohort A included lymphopenia ( n = 5 [71%]), hyperglycemia ( n = 2, [29%]), diarrhea ( n = 2, [29%]) and rash ( n = 2, [29%]) and in cohort B included lymphopenia ( n = 5 [71%]), hyperglycemia ( n = 4 [57%]) and neutropenia ( n = 2 [29%]. The mean number of cycles on protocol was 6. The overall objective response rate was 14% (2 /14). No objective responses were observed in the PTEN deficient cohort. Four out of 6 patients with stable disease (SD) had SD or better for ≥6 cycles, 2 of which had PTEN deficient tumors. Conclusion The addition of buparlisib to high dose carboplatin and paclitaxel was not tolerable. The combination did not reveal significant clinical activity amongst a small and heterogenous group of PTEN deficient tumors, [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction In complement to anti-EGFR therapy, the targeting of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is of particular interest in the management of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC). Here, we assess the effects of PI3K inhibition combined with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab and/or irradiation (RT). Material and methods Anti-proliferative effects of the combination of buparlisib (a specific PI3K inhibitor), cetuximab and RT was determined in two HNSCC cell lines (CAL33, PI3KCA H1047R-mutated and CAL27, PI3KCA wild-type). We examined biochemical factors related to proliferation, apoptosis (caspases), DNA repair (ERCC1, XRCC1) and the PI3K pathway (pEGFR/EGFR, pAKT/AKT, p-p70, p4EBP1). Results The best synergistic combined treatment in inhibiting cell proliferation was sequence 2 (cetuximab followed by buparlisib) in both cell lines. Addition of RT increased sequence 2 anti-proliferative effect only in CAL27. Data on protein expression indicated a possible activation of mTORC2 complex and caspases proteins in CAL27 not seen in CAL33. In CAL33, the synergistic anti-proliferative effect of the two drugs may derive from the higher sensitivity of mutated cells to PI3K targeting. Conclusions Our study demonstrates a synergistic effect of cetuximab followed by buparlisib in both PI3KCA wild-type and mutated cells, even with different intracellular signaling cross-talk depending on mutational status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The pan-Class I PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (BKM120) has shown activity in a range of preclinical cancer models. This first-in-man study was initiated to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of buparlisib (100 mg/day) and to assess safety and preliminary efficacy. Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors ( N = 83) enrolled in a Phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study of single-agent buparlisib. Patients in the dose-expansion arm ( n = 43) had tumor samples with PIK3CA and/or PTEN alterations. Results The most common cancers were colorectal ( n = 31) and breast cancer ( n = 21). Median number of prior antineoplastic regimens was four (range: 1-12). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included asthenia (12.0 %) and performance status decrease (9.6 %). Treatment-related AEs (all grades) included decreased appetite, diarrhea, nausea (each in 33 % of patients), hyperglycemia (31 %) and rash (29 %). One confirmed partial response (PR; triple-negative breast cancer) and three unconfirmed PRs (parotid gland carcinoma, epithelioid hemangiothelioma, ER + breast cancer) were reported. Tumor molecular status did not predict clinical benefit in the full study cohort, or among the colorectal or breast cancer subpopulations. Pharmacodynamic biomarkers (F-FDG-PET, C-peptide, pS6) demonstrated dose-dependent changes; however, tumor heterogeneity precluded a clear correlation with clinical benefit. Conclusion Buparlisib was well tolerated up to the 100 mg/day dose and showed preliminary activity in patients with advanced cancers. Future studies in more homogeneous patient populations will evaluate buparlisib in combination with other agents and further investigate the use of predictive biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]