1. Is Coronary Physiology Assessment Valid in Special Circumstances?: Aortic Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Other.
- Author
-
Tehrani DM and Seto AH
- Subjects
- Humans, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Vessels, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular diagnosis, Cardiac Catheterization, Reproducibility of Results, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial physiology, Coronary Stenosis, Atrial Fibrillation complications, Aortic Valve Stenosis complications, Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnosis, Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery
- Abstract
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and nonhyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) provide an important clinical tool to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions. However, these indices have major limitations. As these indices are meant to be surrogates of coronary flow, clinical scenarios such as aortic stenosis (with increased end-systolic and end-diastolic pressures) or atrial fibrillation (with significant beat-to-beat cardiac output variability) can have significant effect on the accuracy and reliability of these hemodynamic indices. Here, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of the pitfalls, limitations, and strengths of FFR and NHPRs in common clinical scenarios paired with coronary artery disease., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr D.M. Tehrani reports no disclosures. Dr A.H. Seto has received research grants from Philips and Acist, consulting fees from Medtronic and Medicure, and is a speaker for Terumo, General Electric, and Janssen, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF