Search

Background: Vaginal epithelial abnormalities (VEA) are a common complication associated with pessary use. The objective of this study was to determine if there is a host pro-inflammatory response associated with pessary use and VEA., Methods: Patients wearing pessaries for at least two weeks for the management of pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence were screened for eligibility. Vaginal swabs were collected from women with VEA (cases) and without VEA (controls). Cases were matched to controls in a 1:3 ratio. Cytokine analysis of the collected samples was performed using multiplex analysis to determine the concentrations of interleukin (IL)6, interferon alpha 2 (IFNα2), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and IL1β. A cross-sectional analysis was performed, comparing vaginal cytokine concentrations in women with and without VEA., Results: We enrolled 211 patients in this analysis: 50 cases and 161 controls. The median concentrations (pg/mL) of the four cytokines for cases and controls respectively were; IL6: 6.7 (IQR <2.9 [the lower limit of detection, LLD]-14.2) and < 2.9 (LLD) (IQR <2.9 [LLD]-5.5), IFNα2: 8.2 (IQR 6.1-13.9) and 7.9 (IQR 3.9-13.6), TNFα: 15.2 (IQR 6.1-30.4) and 4.68 (IQR <2.3 [LLD]-16.3), IL1β 195.7 (IQR 54.5-388.6) and 38.5 (IQR 6.7-154.9). The differences in median cytokine levels were statistically higher in cases for IL6, TNFα, and IL1β (all p < 0.001) compared to controls. Older age (OR: 1.062, 95% CI, 1.015-1.112), lower BMI (OR: 0.910, 95% CI, 0.839-0.986) and presence of VEA at last check (OR: 5.377, 95% CI, 2.049-14.108) were associated with higher odds of having VEA on multivariate analysis., Conclusion: Pro-inflammatory cytokines, specifically IL6, TNFα, and IL1β, are elevated in pessary-wearing patients who have VEA. Additional prospective studies are needed to assess baseline vaginal inflammatory profiles before and after pessary placement to understand VEA formation in pessary patients., (© 2021. The International Urogynecological Association.)

Introduction and Hypothesis: Risk factors can be used to determine what patients will develop delayed postoperative urinary retention after female pelvic reconstructive surgery., Methods: A case-control study was performed including all female pelvic reconstructive surgeries necessitating a voiding trial. All patients passed their previous voiding trial. Cases had an acute encounter for urinary retention. Controls did not have acute postoperative urinary retention. Cases and controls were stratified based on procedure. Demographics, medical/surgical histories, voiding symptoms, urodynamic testing, and intraoperative data were collected. Cases were matched to controls in a 1:3 ratio. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used for univariate analyses; logistic regression was used to determine predictors of delayed postoperative urinary retention (DPOUR)., Results: A total of 1219 patients underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery that met eligibility; 51 cases of DPOUR (4.3%) were identified and matched with 153 controls without postoperative urinary retention. Of the procedures performed, 41.2% had prolapse surgery, 10.3% had incontinence surgery, and 48.5% had both prolapse and incontinence surgery. There were no differences between cases and controls in age, race, prior surgery, medical comorbidities, prolapse stage ≥ 3, voiding symptoms, and surgical characteristics. Cases had a lower BMI than controls (p < 0.001). There was no difference in preoperative urodynamic variables. Cases had lower percent voided volume on their last voiding trial than controls (90.2% ± 28.6% vs. 110.7% ± 39.5%, respectively; p = 0.001); however, clinically we consider a voided volume of two-thirds or greater of the instilled volume to be a normal result., Conclusions: DPOUR is an uncommon postoperative event. Demographic and clinical factors and urodynamic findings were unable to predict DPOUR. Percent voided volume on voiding trial was greater in controls.

Introduction and Hypothesis: Hospital readmission is increasingly used as a measure of quality care. Our objective was to evaluate the rate of readmission and associated factors in women undergoing suburethral sling placement in the USA., Methods: This is a cohort study of suburethral sling procedures performed in the USA from 2012 to 2014 using the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The database was queried for suburethral sling procedures. Records were excluded if concomitant surgery had been performed. Patient and surgical characteristics were evaluated for association with readmission using Chi-squared test for categorical variables and Student's t test for continuous variables. All results yielding p < 0.05 were deemed statistically significant., Results: A total of 7,117 suburethral sling procedures were identified. There were 83 (1.16%) hospital readmissions. Those who were readmitted tended to be older (p = 0.011), non-Hispanic (p = 0.04), smokers (p < 0.001), and have an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score of 3 or 4 (p = 0.001). A history of bleeding disorder (p < 0.001), congestive heart failure (p < 0.001), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.001) was associated with readmission. Fifty-four (0.75%) patients underwent reoperation within 30 days of suburethral sling placement. The most common reoperation procedure was sling excision (20 patients). The most common complication was urinary tract infection, which occurred in 189 patients (2.7%)., Conclusions: Suburethral sling placement is a safe procedure with a low rate of readmissions, reoperations, and complications. Consistent with other types of surgery, infection is the most common post-operative complication.