Search

Central descent due to a level 1 defect is a main component in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) reconstructive surgery, whether for symptomatic apical prolapse or for the prolapse repair of other compartments. A recent growth in the rate of native tissue repair procedures for POP, following the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings regarding the safety and efficacy of synthetic meshes, requires a re-evaluation of these procedures. The safety, efficacy, and determination of the optimal surgical approach should be the center of attention. Functional outcome measures and patient-centered results have lately gained importance and received focus. A comprehensive literature review was performed to evaluate objective and subjective outcomes of apical prolapse native tissue repair, with a special focus on studies reporting impact on patients' functional outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction. We performed a MEDLINE search for articles in the English language by using the following key words: apical prolapse, sacrospinous ligament fixation, uterosacral ligament suspension, sacral colpopexy, McCall culdoplasty, iliococcygeus vaginal fixation, and functional outcomes. We reviewed references as well. Despite a prominent shortage of studies reporting standardized prospective outcomes for native tissue repair interventions, we noted a high rate of safety and efficacy, with a low complication rate for most procedures and low recurrence or re-treatment rates. The objective and subjective results of different procedures are reviewed. Functional outcomes of native tissue repair procedures have not been studied sufficiently, though existing data present those procedures as favorable and not categorically inferior to sacrocolpopexy. Apical compartment prolapse repair using native tissue is not a compromise. Functional outcomes of native tissue repair procedures are favorable, have a high rate of success, improve women's quality of life (QoL), and result in high rates of patient satisfaction. This subject requires further long-term, standardized prospective studies following the International Continence Society/International Urogynecologists Association guidelines for surgical outcomes report, with the focus on patient-centered functional outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and hypothesis: Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) for pelvic organ prolapse repair can incur significant intraoperative hemorrhage. Management of vascular injury is challenging because of limited visualization of the surrounding pararectal space and is not well described in the literature. Methods: We evaluate cases of intraoperative venous and arterial hemorrhage during SSLF. Based on a review of the literature, we present a systematic approach to the treatment of venous and arterial hemorrhage associated with SSLF. Results: Vascular injury to the hypogastric and pudendal venous plexi may be controlled using directed compression and topical hemostatic agents. Vascular injury to the inferior gluteal artery, its coccygeal branch, or other arteries, may require embolization. Conclusion: Life-threatening bleeding is a rare complication of transvaginal SSLF. Knowledge of surrounding pelvic vascular anatomy, treatment options, and communication with ancillary staff is essential for the treatment of sacrospinous ligament hemorrhage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and hypothesis: The aim was to review the safety and efficacy of pelvic organ prolapse surgery for vaginal apical prolapse. Methods: Every 4 years and as part of the Fifth International Collaboration on Incontinence we reviewed the English-language scientific literature after searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library and Cochrane database of systematic reviews, published up to January 2012. Publications were classified as level 1 evidence (randomised controlled trials (RCT) or systematic reviews), level 2 (poor quality RCT, prospective cohort studies), level 3 (case series or retrospective studies) and level 4 case reports. The highest level of evidence was utilised by the committee to make evidence-based recommendations based upon the Oxford grading system. Grade A recommendation usually depends on consistent level 1 evidence. Grade B recommendation usually depends on consistent level 2 and or 3 studies, or 'majority evidence' from RCTs. Grade C recommendation usually depends on level 4 studies or 'majority evidence‟ from level 2/3 studies or Delphi processed expert opinion. Grade D 'no recommendation possible' would be used where the evidence is inadequate or conflicting and when expert opinion is delivered without a formal analytical process, such as by Delphi. Results: Abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) has a higher success rate than sacrospinous colpopexy with less SUI and postoperative dyspareunia for vault prolapse. ASC had greater morbidity including operating time, inpatient stay, slower return to activities of daily living and higher cost (grade A). ASC has the lowest inpatient costs compared with laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) and robotic sacral colpopexy (RSC). LSC has lower inpatient costs than RSC (grade B).In single RCTs the RSC had longer operating time than both ASC and LSC (grade B). In small trials objective outcomes appear similar although postoperative pain was greater in RSC. LSC is as effective as ASC with reduced blood loss and admission time (grade C). The data relating to operating time are conflicting. ASC performed with polypropylene mesh has superior outcomes to fascia lata (level I), porcine dermis and small intestine submucosa (level 3; grade B). In a single RCT, LSC had a superior objective and subjective success rate and lower reoperation rate compared with polypropylene transvaginal mesh for vault prolapse (grade B).Level 3 evidence suggests that vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension, McCall culdoplasty, iliococcygeus fixation and colpocleisis are relatively safe and effective interventions (grade C). Conclusion: Sacral colpopexy is an effective procedure for vault prolapse and further data are required on the route of performance and efficacy of this surgery for uterine prolapse. Polypropylene mesh is the preferred graft at ASC. Vaginal procedures for vault prolapse are well described and are suitable alternatives for those not suitable for sacral colpopexy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract  Will total abdominal hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy lead to polypropylene (Prolene, Ethicon, Somerset, NJ) mesh erosions? Sixty-seven patients demonstrating a stage 2 or more International Continence Society cystocele, rectocele, and uterine prolapse underwent combined sacrocolpopexy and polypropylene mesh fixation and total abdominal hysterectomy. Surgical failure was noted as prolapse of any of the three pelvic compartments with a stage 2 or more recurrence. Sixty-four patients were available for examination, and none demonstrated mesh erosion or recurrent vault prolapse with a median follow-up of 27 months. Four patients experienced a recurrent stage 2 rectocele without any cystoceles or vault prolapse. Performing abdominal hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy with polypropylene extensions does not increase the occurrence of synthetic material erosions in the vaginal vault or the anterior or posterior vaginal walls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this review was to compare properties of the most commonly used synthetic meshes and describe their use in gynecologic procedures. An Ovid search of the English literature from 1966 to the present was carried out, together with a hand search of Index Medicus from 1950 to 1965. Articles involving the use of mesh in surgical procedures or comparative studies of the different mechanical properties of mesh are included. Overviews from urogynecologic texts and surgical texts are also included. All studies in this review consisted of retrospective case series (21 suburethral sling articles, 15 sacrocolpopexy articles, and five pelvic sling articles). No randomized prospective trials were available. Outcome variables, including cure rates and mesh-related complications, are reviewed and compared. Conclusions show that long-term success of the suburethral sling with synthetic mesh ranges from 61% to 100%, and the success rate of the abdominal sacrocolpopexies using mesh ranges from 68% to 100%. Mesh-related complications rates are frequent, with up to a 35% removal rate and 10% sinus tract formation for suburethral slings and 9% erosion rate for sacrocolpopexy. The ideal synthetic mesh material for pelvic surgery, one that induces minimal foreign-body reaction with minimal risk of infection, rejection and erosion, has yet to be developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]