Search

Objectives: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) 8th edition has proposed micrometastasis as a lymph node metastasis (LN+) of diameter ≤2 mm in prostate cancer. However, supporting evidence has not described. We evaluated LN+ patients' survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) based on the LN maximum tumor diameter (MTD). Methods: Data from 561 LN+ patients after RP and pelvic LN dissection (PLND) treated between 2006 and 2019 at 33 institutions were retrospectively investigated. Patients were stratified by a LN+ MTD cutoff of 2 mm. Outcomes included castration resistance‐free survival (CRFS), metastasis‐free survival (MFS), cancer‐specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results: In total, 282 patients were divided into two groups (LN+ MTD >2 mm [n = 206] and ≤2 mm [n = 76]). Patients of LN+ status >2 mm exhibited significantly decreased CRFS and MFS, and poorer CSS and OS. No patients developed CRPC in the LN+ status ≤2 mm group when the PLND number was ≥14. Multivariate analysis showed the number of LN removed, RP Gleason pattern 5, and MTD in LN+ significantly predicted CRFS. Conclusions: Patients of LN+ status ≤2 mm showed better prognoses after RP. In all the patients in the ≤2‐mm group, the progression to CRPC could be prevented with appropriate interventions, particularly when PLND is performed accurately. Our findings support the utility of the pN substaging proposed by the AJCC/UICC 8th edition; this will facilitate precision medicine for patients with advanced prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study is part of the SNPs in Nivolumab PD‐1 inhibitor for RCC (SNiP‐RCC). Here we aimed to reveal clinical factors for tumor response, progression, and survival in nivolumab for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in Japanese patients. Methods: We included patients from 23 institutions in Japan. We evaluated the objective response, radiographic progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment‐related grade ≥ 3 (serious adverse events [SAEs]). Results: We included 222 patients. The median age was 69 years (interquartile range 62–74 years), and 71% of the patients were male. Pancreas metastasis, lung metastases, prior cytokine therapy, and SAEs, were associated with objective response. The median PFS was 18 months. Liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61), age ≥ 75 (HR, 0.48), previous resection of primary sites (HR, 0.47), and SAEs (HR, 0.47) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Karnofsky Performance Status <70 (HR, 2.90), high platelets (HR, 4.48), previous resection of primary sites (HR, 0.23), and pathological grade (HR, 0.19 for grade 2 and HR, 0.12 for grade 3) were independent prognostic factors for OS. SAEs were reported in 45 (20.3%) cases. In the group of patients with prior nephrectomy, SAEs were associated with objective response, PFS, and OS. Conclusion: The SNiP‐RCC study identified clinical parameters correlated with treatment outcomes in Japanese patients with priorly treated advanced clear cell RCC undergoing nivolumab monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Novel androgen receptor axis‐targeted agents (ARATAs) have been developed for mCRPC and improved overall survival (OS). Here, we aimed to find predictors who will receive the greatest benefits from ARATAs. Methods: We previously performed a multicenter study to identify prognostic factors for metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC, n = 148) and mCRPC (n = 99), and showed that the bone scan index (BSI) was one of the significant prognostic factors for 3‐year OS (PROSTAT‐BSI study). mHSPC progressed to mCRPC (n = 101), for which 69 patients were treated with (n = 39) or without ARATAs (n = 30, prior to the approval of ARATAs). The 69 patients were divided into two groups according to patient factors, and these cohorts were further divided into two subgroups by usage of ARATAs. OS was compared between subgroups in each group. Results: The predictors were age (<71.4 years), serum levels of C‐reactive protein (≥0.16 ng/ml) and alkaline phosphatase (≥548 U/L), time to PSA progression after ADT (<8.9 months), the lowest PSA level (≥1 ng/ml) after ADT, and the rate of PSA decline 3 months after ADT (<0.987), whereas hemoglobin levels, PSA before ADT, Gleason scores, existence of visceral metastases, and BSI were not. Conclusions: The present study identified predictors for the effectiveness of ARATAs. The number of bone metastases (≒BSI), existence of visceral metastases, and Gleason scores, which were identified as high‐risk factors in the LATITUDE study and disease volume in CHAARTED criteria, did not appear to be useful for predicting effectiveness from ARATAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine prognostic factors including the Bone Scan Index in prostate cancer patients receiving standard hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. Methods: This multicenter Prostatic Cancer Registry of Standard Hormonal and Chemotherapy Using Bone Scan Index study involved 30 hospitals and enrolled 247 patients (age 71 ± 8 years) with metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (n = 148) under hormone therapy and metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (n = 99) under chemotherapy. The Bone Scan Index (%) was determined by whole‐body bone scintigraphy using 99mTc‐methylenediphosphonate. Patients were classified into tertiles and binary groups, and predictors of all‐cause death including Bone Scan Index, prostate‐specific antigen, and bone metabolic markers were determined using survival and proportional hazard analyses. Results: During a mean follow‐up period of 716 ± 404 days, 81 (33%) of the patients died, and 3‐year mortality rates were 20% and 52% in the metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer groups, respectively. Survival analysis showed that a Bone Scan Index >3.5% was a significant determinant of death in the metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer group, whereas prostate‐specific antigen >55 ng/mL before chemotherapy was a determinant of prognosis in the metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer group. A Bone Scan Index >3.5% was also associated with a high incidence of prostate‐specific antigen progression in the metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer group. Patients with metastatic hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer and a better Bone Scan Index response (>45%) to treatment had lower mortality rates than those without such response. Conclusion: The Bone Scan Index and hot spot number are significant determinants of 3‐year mortality, and combining the Bone Scan Index with prostate‐specific antigen should contribute to the management of prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate the impact on intravesical recurrence and prognosis according to the ureteral ligation timing during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Methods: We carried out a retrospective chart review of 664 patients with non‐metastatic upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with ureteral ligation (supplementary analysis of JCOG1110A). We excluded patients with previous and/or synchronous bladder cancer, clinically node‐positive disease, no ureteral ligation data, those without ureteral ligation and those with any missing data. We investigated the cumulative incidence of intravesical recurrence and cancer‐specific mortality, and overall survival between patients with ureteral ligation before renovascular ligation (early ureteral ligation), or ureteral ligation after renovascular ligation (late ureteral ligation). Results: Early and late ureteral ligation was carried out in 243 patients (36.6%) and 421 patients (63.4%), respectively. Intravesical recurrence occurred in 218 patients (32.8%) during follow up (median 3.9 years). No significant difference in the intravesical recurrence was found between early and late ureteral ligation groups. Meanwhile, survival in the early ureteral ligation group was significantly worse compared with the late ureteral ligation group. Multivariable analysis showed that early ureteral ligation was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% confidence interval 1.24–2.85, P = 0.003) and cancer‐specific mortality (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.14–3.25, P = 0.014). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the incidence of intravesical recurrence is not affected by the timing of ureteral ligation during radical nephroureterectomy. However, early ureteral ligation might have a negative impact on survival outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To present the study design and rationale of Prostatic Cancer Registry of Standard Hormonal and Chemotherapy Using Bone Scan Index, a prospective study aiming to determine the role of the bone scan index, the amount of bone metastasis, in the treatment and prognosis of prostate cancer patients. Methods: A total of 237 patients were recruited at 30 hospitals in Japan. All had prostate cancer with bone metastasis and were scheduled to undergo either hormonal therapy (group H) or chemotherapy (group C). Bone scans were carried out with 99mTc‐methylenediphosphonate. Follow‐up studies are planned to continue for 3 years, and changes in biochemical and tumor markers in response to hormonal therapy and chemotherapy will be recorded in addition to skeletal‐related events, recurrence, disease progression and death. Results: The basic characteristics of the patients (n = 200) at the time of registration during December 2016 were as follows: mean age 71 ± 8 years; median bone scan index calculated on‐site 1.9% (range 0.02–13.3%); median number of hot spots 18 (range 1–128); median prostate‐specific antigen 155 ng/mL (range 0.04–22 412 ng/mL); and the most frequent Gleason score 9 (47%). The prostate‐specific antigen value was higher in group H than group C (288 vs 33 ng/mL, P < 0.0001), whereas bone scan indexes were comparable (1.7 vs 2.3%, not significant) between the two groups. Liver metastasis was more frequent in group C than group H (6.1% vs 0.8%, P = 0.035). Conclusions: The baseline characteristics of the Prostatic Cancer Registry of Standard Hormonal and Chemotherapy Using Bone Scan Index database have been established. This collaborative study can now proceed with clarifying the role of the bone scan index for patient management including treatment strategies and prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]