Search

Background: Stroke prevalence is increasing with age. Alteplase is the only agent approved for thrombolytic treatment for patients with ischemic stroke, including patients ≥80 years. In the present study, the aim was to compare efficacy and safety of tenecteplase and alteplase in patients ≥80 years. Methods: Data from the Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing alteplase and tenecteplase, were assessed. Results: Of the 273 patients ≥80 years included, mean age was 85.5 years. In the intention-to-treat analyses, 43.1% receiving tenecteplase and 39.9% receiving alteplase reached excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–1) after 3 months (odds ratio (OR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70–1.85, p=0.59). No significant differences among patients in the two treatment groups regarding frequency of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage during the first 48 h were identified (11 (8.5%) in the tenecteplase group, 10 (7.0%) in the alteplase group, OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.50–3.00, p 0.65). Death within 3 months occurred in 18 patients (14.3%) in the tenecteplase group and in 21 (15.3%) in the alteplase group (p 0.84). After excluding stroke mimics, the proportion of patients with excellent functional outcome was 44.1% in the tenecteplase group and 34.4% in the alteplase group (OR 1.50 CI 0.90–2.52, p 0.12). Conclusion: No differences in the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase in patients ≥80 years were identified. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01949948) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stroke mimics are frequently treated with thrombolysis in clinical practice and thrombolytic trials. Although alteplase in stroke mimics has proven to be safe, safety of tenecteplase in stroke mimics has not been assessed in an ischemic stroke study setting. We aimed to assess clinical characteristics and safety of stroke mimics treated with thrombolysis in the Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial. We also aimed to identify possible predictors of stroke mimics as compared to patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Methods: Norwegian Tenecteplase Stroke Trial was a phase-3 trial investigating safety and efficacy of tenecteplase vs. alteplase in patients with suspected acute cerebral ischemia. Two groups were defined based on diagnose at discharge: patients with a different diagnose than ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (stroke mimics group) and patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (acute cerebral ischemia group). Logistic regression analyses were performed with stroke mimics vs. acute cerebral ischemia as dependent variable to identify predictors of stroke mimics. Results: Of 1091 randomized patients, 181 (16.6%) were stroke mimics. Migraine (22.2%) and peripheral vertigo (11.4%) were the two most frequent stroke mimic-diagnoses. There was no symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in the stroke mimics group. Stroke mimics were independently associated with age ≤60 years (OR 2.75, p < 0.001), female sex (OR 1.48, p = 0.026), no history of myocardial infarction (OR 2.03, p = 0.045), systolic BP ≤ 150 mmHg (OR 2.33, p < 0.001), NIHSS ≤ 6 points (OR 1.83, p = 0.011), sensory loss (OR 1.55, p = 0.015), and no facial paresis (OR 2.41, p < 0.001) on admission. Conclusion: Thrombolysis with tenecteplase seems to be as safe as with alteplase in stroke mimics. Predictors were identified for stroke mimics which may contribute to differentiate stroke mimics from acute cerebral ischemia in future stroke trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]