Search

Purpose: In this multicenter collaboration, we report real-world data in the largest published series of long-term outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with peritransplant radiation therapy (pt-RT) and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT)., Methods and Materials: We conducted a retrospective analysis including data from 12 institutions. Eligibility required histologic diagnosis of HL, receipt of ASCT plus pt-RT between 2004 and 2014 for r/r HL, and age ≥18 years at the time of ASCT. All patients received salvage chemotherapy for maximum debulking before ASCT. Metabolic responses were scored according to the Lugano Classification. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were calculated to estimate the effect of covariates on patients' outcome., Results: One hundred thirty-one patients were eligible: 68 were male (52%), and median age at ASCT was 32 years (range, 18-70). At the time of diagnosis with r/r HL, 92 patients (70%) had limited (stage I-II) disease, and 10 patients (8%) had bulky disease. Pt-RT was given pre-ASCT in 32 patients (24%) and post-ASCT in 99 (76%); median prescribed dose was 30.6 Gy (range, 20-44 Gy). With median follow-up of 60 months, 3- and 5-year OS were 84% and 77%, while 3- and 5-year progression-free survival were 75% and 72%, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analysis, advanced stage at relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P = .04), irradiation of >3 sites (HR, 3.69; P = .01), and incomplete metabolic response after salvage chemotherapy (HR, 2.24; P = .01) had a negative effect on OS. The sequencing of pt-RT (pre- vs post-ASCT) did not affect outcomes., Conclusions: Overall, the addition of pt-RT to ASCT for patients with r/r HL is associated with very good outcomes. Limited relapsed disease with ≤3 sites involved and achievement of complete metabolic response after salvage chemotherapy were predictive of more favorable prognosis., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We conducted a phase 3 randomized clinical trial to assess whether radical hemithoracic radiation therapy (RHR) compared with palliative radiation therapy (PR) can achieve overall survival (OS) advantages in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM)., Methods and Materials: From August 2014 to May 2018, patients with histologically diagnosed nonmetastatic MPM, who underwent nonradical lung-sparing surgery and chemotherapy (CHT), were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive RHR or PR. RHR total dose to the involved pleural cavity was 50 Gy in 25 fractions, and the gross residual disease received a simultaneous integrated boost of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were local control, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, and acute and late toxicity rates. A sample size of 108 patients considering a type I error (α) of 0.05 and a statistical power of 80% was calculated to prove that RHR could improve the 2-year OS. OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test (2-sided) tested differences between arms. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard model. Possible prognostic factors investigated: age, sex, performance status, lung surgery, gross residual disease, and histology., Results: One hundred eight patients were randomized: 53 to the PR arm and 55 to the RHR arm. Median follow-up was 14.6 months. The 2-year OS rate was 58% in the RHR arm versus 28% in the PR arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.95; P = .031). In the RHR arm: 11 patients experienced acute toxicity grade ≥3, 17 patients had grade 3 to 4 late toxicity. Nine patients experience a grade ≥2 pneumonitis, including 1 patient with grade 5., Conclusions: RHR significantly improves survival in patients with MPM treated with nonradical lung-sparing surgery and CHT compared with palliative treatments, although it is associated with a nonnegligible toxicity profile., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To investigate the local outcome of patients after accelerated partial breast irradiation with intraoperative electrons (IORT) for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) compared with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)., Methods and Materials: From 1999 to 2007, 2173 patients were treated with breast-conserving surgery and IORT (21 Gy/1 fraction) as the sole local treatment: 252 patients with ILC (11.6%) were compared with 1921 patients with IDC in terms of local control., Results: Compared with the IDC subgroup, patients with ILC had a low-risk profile and were more hormone responsive. The 5- and 10-year in-breast tumor reappearance (IBTR) rates were 5.5% and 14.4%, respectively, for the IDC group and 7.5% and 21.8%, respectively, for the ILC group (log-rank P=.03). The excess risk of IBTR associated with ILC was particularly high for small tumors (≤1 cm: hazard ratio [HR], 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-4.85), elderly patients (60-69 years: HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.11-4.63; ≥70 years: HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.08-10.0), low-grade tumors (grade 1: HR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.05-11.7), and luminal A molecular subtype (HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.49-6.77). Among the ILC histologic variants, no difference between classic and nonclassic subgroups was observed, although the signet ring cell and solid variants had the worst local control., Conclusions: Despite a favorable tumor profile, accelerated partial breast irradiation with IORT led to a higher incidence of IBTRs in patients with ILC compared with those with IDC. Our institutional experience emphasized the importance of the size of the irradiation field, pointing to the use of larger collimators, even when dealing with small tumors, to improve local control., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)