Search

Purpose Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has emerged as an alternative treatment option when curative treatment modalities cannot be applied. Although excellent local tumor control has been achieved with SBRT, the targeting accuracy in real-life practice remains poorly understood. We proposed an in vivo assessment of targeting accuracy using hepatic parenchymal changes observed on gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images and applied this method to investigate the “real-life” targeting accuracy of image-guided SBRT. Methods and Materials We selected 29 patients with available follow-up MR images acquired 2 to 4 months after completion of SBRT. All patients were administered 45 Gy in 3 fractions. The treated HCC and the region of hepatic parenchymal changes in the hepatobiliary phase of MR images were delineated. We evaluated the discrepancies between the center of the HCC and that of the parenchymal change area (intercenter discrepancy [ICD]). We also analyzed the difference in ICDs between those who underwent SBRT with intrahepatic marker guidance and those with diaphragm guidance. Results The median ICD in the 3-dimensional direction was 6.81 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 4.27-9.61 mm). Those for the craniocaudal, left–right, and anteroposterior components were 2.70 mm (IQR, 1.83-4.06 mm), 1.63 mm (IQR, 0.76-3.49), and 4.12 mm (IQR, 1.20-6.96 mm), respectively. The median ICD for patients who underwent treatment with intrahepatic marker guidance and those with diaphragm guidance was 7.53 mm (IQR, 6.63-10.86 mm) and 5.60 mm (IQR, 4.28-8.18 mm), respectively. There was no significant difference in ICD between those who underwent treatment with intrahepatic marker guidance and those with diaphragm guidance (P = .296). Conclusions The hepatic parenchymal changes observed on Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR images can be used to assess the targeting accuracy after SBRT for HCC.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases by comparing two different treatment regimens, single-dose radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). Methods and Materials Between November 2003 and December 2008, 98 patients with brain metastases were included. Fifty-eight patients were treated with SRS, and forty were treated with FSRT. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was used for large lesions or lesions located near critical structures. The median doses were 20 Gy for the SRS group and 36 Gy in 6 fractions for the FSRT group. Results With a median follow-up period of 7 months, the median survival was 7 months for all patients, with a median of 6 months for the SRS group and 8 months for the FSRT group ( p = 0.89). Local progression–free survival (LPFS) rates at 6 months and 1 year were 81% and 71%, respectively, for the SRS group and 97% and 69%, respectively, for the FSRT group ( p = 0.31). Despite the fact that FSRT was used for large lesions and lesions in adverse locations, LPFS was not inferior to SRS. Toxicity was more frequently observed in the SRS group than in the FSRT group (17% vs. 5%, p = 0.05). Conclusions Because patients treated with FSRT exhibited similar survival times and LPFS rates with a lower risk of toxicity in comparison to those treated with SRS, despite the fact that FSRT was used for large lesions and lesions in adverse locations, we find that FSRT can particularly be beneficial for patients with large lesions or lesions located near critical structures. Further investigation is warranted to determine the optimal dose/fractionation.

Purpose To compare chemotherapy alone with chemoradiation therapy in stage III-IV(M0) gastric cancer treated with R0 gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Methods and Materials The chemotherapy arm received 5 cycles of fluorouracil and leucovorin (FL), and the chemoradiation therapy arm received 1 cycle of FL, then radiation therapy of 45 Gy concurrently with 2 cycles of FL, followed by 2 cycles of FL. Intent-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analyses were performed. Results Between May 6, 2002 and June 29, 2006, a total of 90 patients were enrolled. Forty-four were randomly assigned to the chemotherapy arm and 46 to the chemoradiation therapy arm. Treatment was completed as planned by 93.2% of patients in the chemotherapy arm and 87.0% in the chemoradiation therapy arm. Overall intent-to-treat analysis showed that addition of radiation therapy to chemotherapy significantly improved locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) but not disease-free survival. In subgroup analysis for stage III, chemoradiation therapy significantly prolonged the 5-year LRRFS and disease-free survival rates compared with chemotherapy (93.2% vs 66.8%, P=.014; 73.5% vs 54.6%, P=.056, respectively). Conclusions Addition of radiation therapy to chemotherapy could improve the LRRFS in stage III gastric cancer treated with R0 gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection.