Search

Purpose/objective(s) Patients with node-positive (LN+) uterine or cervical cancer often require adjuvant radiation to the pelvis and para-aortics, resulting in significant acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. Proton therapy allows for more conformal delivery of radiation dose. The objective was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of proton beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients with LN+ uterine or cervical cancer requiring RT. Materials/methods Patients with IIIC uterine and pT1,2N1M0 cervical cancer status post hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy were eligible. Sequential (uterine) and concurrent (cervical) chemotherapy were allowed. Exclusion criteria included life expectancy Results 21 patients completed RT between 10/2013 and 10/2018. Median follow-up is 52.3 months (range, 11.2-63.4). Median age was 59.7 years (range, 31.5-79.2). 15 patients had IIIC uterine cancer (13 endometrioid) and 6 patients had cervical cancer. 52% received sequential and 29% received concurrent chemotherapy. Median dose was 45.0 Gy (RBE). 20 (95%) received VB boost. 4 received PRT and 17 EFRT. Acute grade 2 and 3 GI toxicity was 24% and 14%, respectively. Acute grade 2 and 3 GU toxicity was 10% and 0%, respectively. Acute grade 2 and 3 hematologic toxicity was 24% and 0%, respectively. To date, there have been no late toxicities > grade 3. The 2-year PFS was 81% (95% CI, 56%-92%). Of the 5 patients that recurred, 4 were peritoneal and 1 was abdominal wall and lung; no recurrences were in-field. The 2-year OS was 86% (95% CI, 62%-95%). Conclusion Scanned proton beam RT appears effective in preventing local-regional recurrence in LN+ patients with uterine and cervical cancer undergoing adjuvant radiation. Acute toxicity is low and severe late effects have not been observed but await longer follow-up. Author disclosure A.L. Russo: None. K.D. Bernstein: None. S.P. Nisbet: None. N. Horick: None. N. Depauw: None. B.Y. Yeap: None. H.M. Kooy: None. T.F. DeLaney: None. A.H. Russell: None.

Purpose Proton therapy can allow for superior avoidance of normal tissues. A widespread consensus has been reached that proton therapy should be used for patients with curable pediatric brain tumor to avoid critical central nervous system structures. Brainstem necrosis is a potentially devastating, but rare, complication of radiation. Recent reports of brainstem necrosis after proton therapy have raised concerns over the potential biological differences among radiation modalities. We have summarized findings from the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children convened in May 2016 to examine brainstem injury. Methods and Materials Twenty-seven physicians, physicists, and researchers from 17 institutions with expertise met to discuss this issue. The definition of brainstem injury, imaging of this entity, clinical experience with photons and photons, and potential biological differences among these radiation modalities were thoroughly discussed and reviewed. The 3 largest US pediatric proton therapy centers collectively summarized the incidence of symptomatic brainstem injury and physics details (planning, dosimetry, delivery) for 671 children with focal posterior fossa tumors treated with protons from 2006 to 2016. Results The average rate of symptomatic brainstem toxicity from the 3 largest US pediatric proton centers was 2.38%. The actuarial rate of grade ≥2 brainstem toxicity was successfully reduced from 12.7% to 0% at 1 center after adopting modified radiation guidelines. Guidelines for treatment planning and current consensus brainstem constraints for proton therapy are presented. The current knowledge regarding linear energy transfer (LET) and its relationship to relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are defined. We review the current state of LET-based planning. Conclusions Brainstem injury is a rare complication of radiation therapy for both photons and protons. Substantial dosimetric data have been collected for brainstem injury after proton therapy, and established guidelines to allow for safe delivery of proton radiation have been defined. Increased capability exists to incorporate LET optimization; however, further research is needed to fully explore the capabilities of LET- and RBE-based planning.

Purpose/Objective(s) Our institution developed proton stereotactic radiosurgery (PSRS) techniques and treated patients since 1961. A recent upgrade from passive scattering (PS) delivery to pencil beam scanning (PBS) required validation of this modality for small fields. We describe the adaptation of an existing clinical PSRS service to PBS. We outline potential advantages and disadvantages the modality has to offer. Materials/Methods Patient alignment is determined from 2D/3D x-ray corrections of surgically implanted fiducials. End-to-end tests using a skull phantom were performed to validate a change of treatment planning system (TPS). PSRS PS fields from prior years established applicable parameters for dose, range, modulation, field size and aspect ratio for PBS validation. 18 fields were created to verify agreement with the TPS. A diamond detector was used to measure SOBP doses and film to measure profiles. A QA phantom enabled simultaneous measurement with film and diamond detector. X-rays were used to verify detector alignment prior to measurements. A hybrid 2D/3D γ-analysis was used to assess lateral profiles. Plans were generated for previously treated patients and used to perform end-to-end tests. These included 6 AVM, 3 pituitaries and 1 cavernous sinus lesion. Clinical directives were obtained from the original plans. Results End-to-end phantom tests conformed sub-mm alignment. Distal and proximal depth agreement were 0.10 ± 0.66% and 0.74 ± 0.48 mm. Isocenter and shallow depth dose agreement was -1.7 ± 2.9% and 2.5 ± 5.1%, respectively. Global 2%/1mm/10% γ-analysis resulted in pass rates of 97.2 ± 4.8%. 24 clinical fields were delivered. Dose agreement was -2.8 ± 2.7%. Global 3%/1mm/10% γ- analysis PASS rates were 99.5 ± 1.4%. Conclusion We have revalidated SRS appropriate fiducial-based alignment and defined a small-field QA process using a diamond detector & film to demonstrate PSRS performed with PBS delivery is accurate. Proton delivery systems and TPS modeling can differ significantly. Therefore, validation and plan quality results should not be generalized to all systems. Proton range uncertainties play an important role in determining the appropriateness of PSRS. PBS does not offer distal benefits for small targets compared to passive scattering using range compensators. Larger SRS targets with irregular shapes may benefit from intensity variations and variable modulation offered by PBS. VMAT generally provides slightly superior target coverage for small pituitary lesion, but target coverage for larger pituitary lesions not abutting the optic structures and prescribed to lower doses are more comparable for VMAT and PBS while lowering integral dose. Our validation effort enabled the transition of an active PSRS program from PS to PBS. Author Disclosure M. Bussiere: None. J. Daartz: None. J. Verburg: Employee; Massachusetts General Hospital. Research Grant; National Cancer Institute. N. Depauw: None. H.M. Kooy: None. J.S. Loeffler: Employee; Massachusetts General Hospital. Advisory Board; Mevion. P.H. Chapman: None. H.A. Shih: Employee; Dartmouth Hitchcock. Research Grant; AbbVie, NIH. Honoraria; UpToDate. Consultant; Cleveland Clinic. Speaker's Bureau; prIME Oncology. advisory; The Radiosurgery Society. director of clinical operations; Massachusetts General Hospital. clinical operational leader; Massachusetts General Hospital.

Purpose At present, proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) for growing children is delivered to the whole vertebral body (WVB) to avoid asymmetric growth. We aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and potential clinical benefit of delivering vertebral body sparing (VBS) versus WVB CSI with passively scattered (PS) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in growing children treated for medulloblastoma. Methods and Materials Five plans were generated for medulloblastoma patients, who had been previously treated with CSI PS proton radiation therapy: ( 1 ) single posteroanterior (PA) PS field covering the WVB (PS-PA-WVB); ( 2 ) single PA PS field that included only the thecal sac in the target volume (PS-PA-VBS); ( 3 ) single PA IMPT field covering the WVB (IMPT-PA-WVB); ( 4 ) single PA IMPT field, target volume including thecal sac only (IMPT-PA-VBS); and ( 5 ) 2 posterior-oblique (−35°, +35°) IMPT fields, with the target volume including the thecal sac only (IMPT2F-VBS). For all cases, 23.4 Gy (relative biologic effectiveness [RBE]) was prescribed to 95% of the spinal canal. The dose, linear energy transfer, and variable-RBE-weighted dose distributions were calculated for all plans using the tool for particle simulation, version 2, Monte Carlo system. Results IMPT VBS techniques efficiently spared the anterior vertebral bodies (AVBs), even when accounting for potential higher variable RBE predicted by linear energy transfer distributions. Assuming an RBE of 1.1, the V10 Gy(RBE) decreased from 100% for the WVB techniques to 59.5% to 76.8% for the cervical, 29.9% to 34.6% for the thoracic, and 20.6% to 25.1% for the lumbar AVBs, and the V20 Gy(RBE) decreased from 99.0% to 17.8% to 20.0% for the cervical, 7.2% to 7.6% for the thoracic, and 4.0% to 4.6% for the lumbar AVBs when IMPT VBS techniques were applied. The corresponding percentages for the PS VBS technique were higher. Conclusions Advanced proton techniques can sufficiently reduce the dose to the vertebral body and allow for vertebral column growth for children with central nervous system tumors requiring CSI. This was true even when considering variable RBE values. A clinical trial is planned for VBS to the thoracic and lumbosacral spine in growing children.

Purpose This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of spot size and the addition of apertures and range compensators on the treatment quality of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy and to define when PBS could improve on passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT). Methods and Materials The patient cohort included 14 pediatric patients treated with PSPT. Six PBS plans were created and optimized for each patient using 3 spot sizes (∼12-, 5.4-, and 2.5-mm median sigma at isocenter for 90- to 230-MeV range) and adding apertures and compensators to plans with the 2 larger spots. Conformity and homogeneity indices, dose-volume histogram parameters, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and integral dose were quantified and compared with the respective PSPT plans. Results The results clearly indicated that PBS with the largest spots does not necessarily offer a dosimetric or clinical advantage over PSPT. With comparable target coverage, the mean dose (D mean ) to healthy organs was on average 6.3% larger than PSPT when using this spot size. However, adding apertures to plans with large spots improved the treatment quality by decreasing the average D mean and EUD by up to 8.6% and 3.2% of the prescribed dose, respectively. Decreasing the spot size further improved all plans, lowering the average D mean and EUD by up to 11.6% and 10.9% compared with PSPT, respectively, and eliminated the need for beam-shaping devices. The NTCP decreased with spot size and addition of apertures, with maximum reduction of 5.4% relative to PSPT. Conclusions The added benefit of using PBS strongly depends on the delivery configurations. Facilities limited to large spot sizes (>∼8 mm median sigma at isocenter) are recommended to use apertures to reduce treatment-related toxicities, at least for complex and/or small tumors.

Purpose: To shorten delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy by reducing the number of energy layers in the treatment plan. Methods and Materials: We have developed an energy layer reduction method, which was implemented into our in-house-developed multicriteria treatment planning system "Erasmus-iCycle." The method consisted of 2 components: (1) minimizing the logarithm of the total spot weight per energy layer; and (2) iteratively excluding low-weighted energy layers. The method was benchmarked by comparing a robust "time-efficient plan" (with energy layer reduction) with a robust "standard clinical plan" (without energy layer reduction) for 5 oropharyngeal cases and 5 prostate cases. Both plans of each patient had equal robust plan quality, because the worst-case dose parameters of the standard clinical plan were used as dose constraints for the time-efficient plan. Worst-case robust optimization was performed, accounting for setup errors of 3 mm and range errors of 3% + 1 mm. We evaluated the number of energy layers and the expected delivery time per fraction, assuming 30 seconds per beam direction, 10 ms per spot, and 400 Giga-protons per minute. The energy switching time was varied from 0.1 to 5 seconds. Results: The number of energy layers was on average reduced by 45% (range, 30%-56%) for the oropharyngeal cases and by 28% (range, 25%-32%) for the prostate cases. When assuming 1, 2, or 5 seconds energy switching time, the average delivery time was shortened from 3.9 to 3.0 minutes (25%), 6.0 to 4.2 minutes (32%), or 12.3 to 7.7 minutes (38%) for the oropharyngeal cases, and from 3.4 to 2.9 minutes (16%), 5.2 to 4.2 minutes (20%), or 10.6 to 8.0 minutes (24%) for the prostate cases. Conclusions: Delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy can be reduced substantially without compromising robust plan quality. Shorter delivery times are likely to reduce treatment uncertainties and costs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Purpose Proton radiation therapy is commonly used in young children with brain tumors for its potential to reduce late effects. However, some proton series report higher rates of brainstem injury (0%-16%) than most photon series (2.2%-8.6%). We report the incidence of brainstem injury and a risk factor analysis in pediatric patients with posterior fossa primary tumors treated with proton radiation therapy at our institution. Methods and Materials The study included 216 consecutive patients treated between 2000 and 2015. Dosimetry was available for all but 4 patients. Grade 2 to 5 late brainstem toxicity was assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results The histologies include medulloblastoma (n=154, 71.3%), ependymoma (n=56, 25.9%), and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (n=6, 2.8%). The median age at irradiation was 6.6 years (range, 0.5-23.1 years); median dose, 54 gray relative biological effectiveness (Gy RBE) (range, 46.8-59.4 Gy RBE); and median follow-up period, 4.2 years (range, 0.1-15.3 years) among 198 survivors. Of the patients, 83.3% received chemotherapy; 70.4% achieved gross total resection. The crude rate of injury was 2.3% in all patients, 1.9% in those with medulloblastoma, 3.6% in those with ependymoma, and 0% in those with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor. The 5-year cumulative incidence of injury was 2.0% (95% confidence interval, 0.7%-4.8%). The median brainstem dose (minimum dose received by 50% of brainstem) in the whole cohort was 53.6 Gy RBE (range, 16.5-56.8 Gy RBE); maximum point dose within the brainstem (Dmax), 55.2 Gy RBE (range, 48.4-60.5 Gy RBE); and mean dose, 50.4 Gy RBE (range, 21.1-56.7 Gy RBE). In the 5 patients with injury, the median minimum dose received by 50% of the brainstem was 54.6 Gy RBE (range, 50.2-55.1 Gy RBE); Dmax, 56.2 Gy RBE (range, 55.0-57.1 Gy RBE); mean dose, 51.3 Gy RBE (range, 45.4-54.4 Gy RBE); and median volume of the brainstem receiving ≥55 Gy RBE (V55), 27.4% (range, 0%-59.4%). Of the 5 patients with injury, 4 had a brainstem Dmax in the highest quartile (≥55.8 Gy RBE, P = .016) and a V55 in the highest tertile (>6.0%) of the cohort distribution (P = .047). Of the 5 patients with injury, 3 were aged >6 years (age range, 4.1-22.8 years), and 4 of 5 patients received chemotherapy and achieved gross total resection. Conclusions The incidence of injury in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors is consistent with previous reports in the photon setting. Our data suggest that when Dmax and V55 are kept

Purpose Setup, range, and anatomical uncertainties influence the dose delivered with intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), but clinical quantification of these errors for oropharyngeal cancer is lacking. We quantified these factors and investigated treatment fidelity, that is, robustness, as influenced by adaptive planning and by applying more beam directions. Methods and Materials We used an in-house treatment planning system with multicriteria optimization of pencil beam energies, directions, and weights to create treatment plans for 3-, 5-, and 7-beam directions for 10 oropharyngeal cancer patients. The dose prescription was a simultaneously integrated boost scheme, prescribing 66 Gy to primary tumor and positive neck levels (clinical target volume-66 Gy; CTV-66 Gy) and 54 Gy to elective neck levels (CTV-54 Gy). Doses were recalculated in 3700 simulations of setup, range, and anatomical uncertainties. Repeat computed tomography (CT) scans were used to evaluate an adaptive planning strategy using nonrigid registration for dose accumulation. Results For the recalculated 3-beam plans including all treatment uncertainty sources, only 69% (CTV-66 Gy) and 88% (CTV-54 Gy) of the simulations had a dose received by 98% of the target volume (D98%) >95% of the prescription dose. Doses to organs at risk (OARs) showed considerable spread around planned values. Causes for major deviations were mixed. Adaptive planning based on repeat imaging positively affected dose delivery accuracy: in the presence of the other errors, percentages of treatments with D98% >95% increased to 96% (CTV-66 Gy) and 100% (CTV-54 Gy). Plans with more beam directions were not more robust. Conclusions For oropharyngeal cancer patients, treatment uncertainties can result in significant differences between planned and delivered IMPT doses. Given the mixed causes for major deviations, we advise repeat diagnostic CT scans during treatment, recalculation of the dose, and if required, adaptive planning to improve adequate IMPT dose delivery.

Purpose To describe, in a setting of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the theoretical dosimetric advantages of proton arc stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in which the beam penumbra of a rotating beam is used to reduce the impact of range uncertainties. Methods and Materials Thirteen patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with proton SBRT underwent repeat planning with photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (Photon-VMAT) and an in-house-developed arc planning approach for both proton passive scattering (Passive-Arc) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT-Arc). An arc was mimicked with a series of beams placed at 10° increments. Tumor and organ at risk doses were compared in the context of high- and low-dose regions, represented by volumes receiving >50% and Results In the high-dose region, conformality index values are 2.56, 1.91, 1.31, and 1.74, and homogeneity index values are 1.29, 1.22, 1.52, and 1.18, respectively, for 3 proton passive scattered beams, Passive-Arc, IMPT-Arc, and Photon-VMAT. Therefore, proton arc leads to a 30% reduction in the 95% isodose line volume to 3-beam proton plan, sparing surrounding organs, such as lung and chest wall. For chest wall, V30 is reduced from 21 cm 3 (3 proton beams) to 11.5 cm 3 , 12.9 cm 3 , and 8.63 cm 3 ( P =.005) for Passive-Arc, IMPT-Arc, and Photon-VMAT, respectively. In the low-dose region, the mean lung dose and V20 of the ipsilateral lung are 5.01 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]), 4.38 Gy(RBE), 4.91 Gy(RBE), and 5.99 Gy(RBE) and 9.5%, 7.5%, 9.0%, and 10.0%, respectively, for 3-beam, Passive-Arc, IMPT-Arc, and Photon-VMAT, respectively. Conclusions Stereotactic body radiation therapy with proton arc and Photon-VMAT generate significantly more conformal high-dose volumes than standard proton SBRT, without loss of coverage of the tumor and with significant sparing of nearby organs, such as chest wall. In addition, both proton arc approaches spare the healthy lung from low-dose radiation relative to photon VMAT. Our data suggest that IMPT-Arc should be developed for clinical use.

Purpose Dosimetric planning studies have described potential benefits for the use of proton radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced breast cancer. We report acute toxicities and feasibility of proton delivery for 12 women treated with postmastectomy proton radiation with or without reconstruction. Methods and Materials Twelve patients were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective clinical trial. The patients were assessed for skin toxicity, fatigue, and radiation pneumonitis during treatment and at 4 and 8 weeks after the completion of therapy. All patients consented to have photographs taken for documentation of skin toxicity. Results Eleven of 12 patients had left-sided breast cancer. One patient was treated for right-sided breast cancer with bilateral implants. Five women had permanent implants at the time of RT, and 7 did not have immediate reconstruction. All patients completed proton RT to a dose of 50.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) to the chest wall and 45 to 50.4 Gy (RBE) to the regional lymphatics. No photon or electron component was used. The maximum skin toxicity during radiation was grade 2, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The maximum CTCAE fatigue was grade 3. There have been no cases of RT pneumonitis to date. Conclusions Proton RT for postmastectomy RT is feasible and well tolerated. This treatment may be warranted for selected patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy, immediate reconstruction, or both that otherwise limits optimal RT delivery using standard methods.

Purpose To report the early outcomes for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated with proton radiotherapy (RT) and to compare the dose distributions for intensity-modulated photon RT (IMRT), three-dimensional conformal proton RT (3D-CPT), and intensity-modulated proton RT to the postoperative tumor bed. Methods and Materials All patients with high-risk (International Neuroblastoma Staging System Stage III or IV) neuroblastoma treated between 2005 and 2010 at our institution were included. All patients received induction chemotherapy, surgical resection of residual disease, high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue, and adjuvant 3D-CPT to the primary tumor sites. The patients were followed with clinical examinations, imaging, and laboratory testing every 6 months to monitor disease control and side effects. IMRT, 3D-CPT, and intensity-modulated proton RT plans were generated and compared for a representative case of adjuvant RT to the primary tumor bed followed by a boost. Results Nine patients were treated with 3D-CPT. The median age at diagnosis was 2 years (range 10 months to 4 years), and all patients had Stage IV disease. All patients had unfavorable histologic characteristics (poorly differentiated histologic features in 8, N-Myc amplification in 6, and 1p/11q chromosomal abnormalities in 4). The median tumor size at diagnosis was 11.4 cm (range 7–16) in maximal dimension. At a median follow-up of 38 months (range 11–70), there were no local failures. Four patients developed distant failure, and, of these, two died of disease. Acute side effects included Grade 1 skin erythema in 5 patients and Grade 2 anorexia in 2 patients. Although comparable target coverage was achieved with all three modalities, proton therapy achieved substantial normal tissue sparing compared with IMRT. Intensity-modulated proton RT allowed additional sparing of the kidneys, lungs, and heart. Conclusions Preliminary outcomes reveal excellent local control with proton therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma, although distant failures continu to occur. Dosimetric comparisons demonstrate the advantage of proton RT compared with IMRT in this setting, allowing more conformal treatment and better normal tissue sparing.

Purpose We completed an implementation of pencil-beam scanning (PBS), a technology whereby a focused beam of protons, of variable intensity and energy, is scanned over a plane perpendicular to the beam axis and in depth. The aim of radiotherapy is to improve the target to healthy tissue dose differential. We illustrate how PBS achieves this aim in a patient with a bulky tumor. Methods and Materials Our first deployment of PBS uses "broad" pencil-beams ranging from 20 to 35 mm (full-width-half-maximum) over the range interval from 32 to 7 g/cm 2 . Such beam-brushes offer a unique opportunity for treating bulky tumors. We present a case study of a large (4,295 cc clinical target volume) retroperitoneal sarcoma treated to 50.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) (presurgery) using a course of photons and protons to the clinical target volume and a course of protons to the gross target volume. Results We describe our system and present the dosimetry for all courses and provide an interdosimetric comparison. Discussion The use of PBS for bulky targets reduces the complexity of treatment planning and delivery compared with collimated proton fields. In addition, PBS obviates, especially for cases as presented here, the significant cost incurred in the construction of field-specific hardware. PBS offers improved dose distributions, reduced treatment time, and reduced cost of treatment.

Purpose Microdosimetric measurements were performed at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, to assess the dose equivalent external to passively delivered proton fields for various clinical treatment scenarios. Methods and Materials Treatment fields evaluated included a prostate cancer field, cranial and spinal medulloblastoma fields, ocular melanoma field, and a field for an intracranial stereotactic treatment. Measurements were completed with patient-specific configurations of clinically relevant treatment settings using a silicon-on-insulator microdosimeter placed on the surface of and at various depths within a homogeneous Lucite phantom. The dose equivalent and average quality factor were assessed as a function of both lateral displacement from the treatment field edge and distance downstream of the beam's distal edge. Results Dose-equivalent value range was 8.3–0.3 mSv/Gy (2.5–60-cm lateral displacement) for a typical prostate cancer field, 10.8–0.58 mSv/Gy (2.5–40-cm lateral displacement) for the cranial medulloblastoma field, 2.5–0.58 mSv/Gy (5–20-cm lateral displacement) for the spinal medulloblastoma field, and 0.5–0.08 mSv/Gy (2.5–10-cm lateral displacement) for the ocular melanoma field. Measurements of external field dose equivalent for the stereotactic field case showed differences as high as 50% depending on the modality of beam collimation. Average quality factors derived from this work ranged from 2–7, with the value dependent on the position within the phantom in relation to the primary beam. Conclusions This work provides a valuable and clinically relevant comparison of the external field dose equivalents for various passively scattered proton treatment fields.

Purpose To compare treatment plans from standard photon therapy to intensity modulated X-rays (IMRT) and protons for craniospinal axis irradiation and posterior fossa boost in a patient with medulloblastoma. Methods Proton planning was accomplished using an in-house 3D planning system. IMRT plans were developed using the KonRad treatment planning system with 6-MV photons. Results Substantial normal-tissue dose sparing was realized with IMRT and proton treatment of the posterior fossa and spinal column. For example, the dose to 90% of the cochlea was reduced from 101.2% of the prescribed posterior fossa boost dose from conventional X-rays to 33.4% and 2.4% from IMRT and protons, respectively. Dose to 50% of the heart volume was reduced from 72.2% for conventional X-rays to 29.5% for IMRT and 0.5% for protons. Long-term toxicity with emphasis on hearing and endocrine and cardiac function should be substantially improved secondary to nontarget tissue sparing achieved with protons. Conclusion The present study clearly demonstrates the advantage of conformal radiation methods for the treatment of posterior fossa and spinal column in children with medulloblastoma, when compared to conventional X-rays. Of the two conformal treatment methods evaluated, protons were found to be superior to IMRT.

Purpose Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), currently offered at Massachusetts General Hospital, uses proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) with intensity modulation, achieving complete target coverage of the chest wall and all nodal regions and reduced dose to the cardiac structures. This work presents the current methodology for such treatment and the ongoing effort for its improvements. Methods and Materials A single PBS field is optimized to ensure appropriate target coverage and heart/lung sparing, using an in–house-developed proton planning system with the capability of multicriteria optimization. The dose to the chest wall skin is controlled as a separate objective in the optimization. Surface imaging is used for setup because it is a suitable surrogate for superficial target volumes. In order to minimize the effect of beam range uncertainties, the relative proton stopping power ratio of the material in breast implants was determined through separate measurements. Phantom measurements were also made to validate the accuracy of skin dose calculation in the treatment planning system. Additionally, the treatment planning robustness was evaluated relative to setup perturbations and patient breathing motion. Results PBS PMRT planning resulted in appropriate target coverage and organ sparing, comparable to treatments by passive scattering (PS) beams but much improved in nodal coverage and cardiac sparing compared to conventional treatments by photon/electron beams. The overall treatment time was much shorter than PS and also shorter than conventional photon/electron treatment. The accuracy of the skin dose calculation by the planning system was within ±2%. The treatment was shown to be adequately robust relative to both setup uncertainties and patient breathing motion, resulting in clinically satisfying dose distributions. Conclusions More than 25 PMRT patients have been successfully treated at Massachusetts General Hospital by using single-PBS fields. The methodology and robustness of both the setup and the treatment have been discussed.

Purpose: This study was performed to establish the dose-localization capability and acute toxicity of a real-time intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) image-guided approach to prostate brachytherapy in select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Nine patients with 1997 American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage T1cNxM0 prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml, biopsy Gleason score not exceeding 3 + 4, and endorectal coil MR stage T2 disease were enrolled into this study. The prescribed minimum peripheral dose was 160 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), which was the MR-defined peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate gland. Using a real-time 0.5 Tesla intraoperative MR imaging unit, 5-mm image planes were obtained throughout the prostate gland. The PZ of the prostate gland, anterior rectal wall, and prostatic urethra were identified on the T2 weighted axial images by an MR radiologist. An optimized treatment plan for catheter insertion was generated intraoperatively. Each catheter containing the 125Iodine sources was placed under real-time MR guidance to ensure that its position in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes was in agreement with the planned trajectory. Real-time dose– volume histogram analyses were used intraoperatively to optimize the dosimetry. Results: For the 9 study patients, 89–99% (median 94%) of the CTV received a minimum peripheral dose of 160 Gy and ≥ 95% of the volume of the prostatic urethra and 42–89% (median 70%) of the volume of the anterior rectal wall received doses that were below the reported tolerance. All patients voided spontaneously within 3 h after discontinuation of the Foley catheter and no patient required more than a limited course (≤ 3 weeks) of oral α-1 blockers for postimplant urethritis. Conclusions: Real-time MR-guided interstitial radiation therapy provided the ability to achieve the planned optimized dose–volume histogram profiles to the CTV and healthy juxtaposed structures intraoperatively, with minimal acute morbidity.

Purpose: The patient population treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is significantly different than that treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Generally, lesions treated with SRT are larger, less spherical, and located within critical regions of the central nervous system; hence, they offer new challenges to the treatment planner. Here a simple, cost effective, beam shaping system has been evaluated relative to both circular collimators and an ideal dynamically conforming system for effectiveness in providing conformal therapy for these lesions. Methods and Materials: We have modeled a simple system for conformal arc therapy using four independent jaws. The jaw positions and collimator angle are changed between arcs but held fixed for the duration of each arc. Eleven previously treated SRT cases have been replanned using this system. The rectangular jaw plans were then compared to the original treatment plans which used circular collimators. The plans were evaluated with respect to tissue sparing at 100%, 80%, 50%, and 20% of the prescriptioni dose. A plan was also done for each tumor in which the beam aperture was continuously conformed to the beams eye view projection of the tumor. This was used as an ideal standard for conformal therapy in the absence of fluence modulation. Results: For tumors with a maximum extent of over 3.5 cm the rectangular jaw plans reduced the mean volume of healthy tissue involved at the prescription dose by 57% relative to the circular collimator plans. The ideal conformal plans offered no significant further improvement at the prescription dose. The relative advantage of the rectangular jaw plans decreased at lower isodoses so that at 20% of the prescriptioni dose tissue involvement for the rectangular jaw plans was equivalent to that for the circular collimator plans. At these isodoses the ideal conformal plans gave substantially better tissue sparing. Conclusion : A simple and economical field shaping device has been shown to provide all of the beam shaping advantage of a hypothetical ideal dynamically conforming system at the prescription level. This system may be immediately implemented in the clinic. It offers a substantial advantage over the currently used circular collimators in the high dose region with equivalent performance in the low dose region.

Purpose: A prototype Miniature Multi-Leaf Collimator (MMLC) designed specifically for radiosurgery and small field radiotherapy has been fabricated and evaluated at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC). This work demonstrates the advantages of a computer-controlled MMLC vs. conventional circular collimation for the treatment of an irregularly shaped target volume in the brain. Methods and Materials: Two patients treatments were selected for this comparison from 38 intracranial tumors treated with radiosurgery at UTMDACC from 8/6/91 to 5/10/94. Target contours and critical structures defined for one of the patients was used to create a simulated target volume and critical structures in a spherical head phantom. Computer simulations were performed using traditional single isocenter treatment with a circular collimator for a set of six arcs. The same arc paths were used to compute the dose distribution for the MMLC and conformed beam geometries were defined using a three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning system with beam's eye view capabilities. Then, the calculated dose distribution for a single isocente, conformal treatment was delivered to the spherical head phantom under static conditions by shaping the MMLC to conform the target volume shape projected as a function of couch rotation and gantry angle. Planar dose distributions through the target volume were measured using therapy verification film located in the phantom. The measurements were used to verify that the 3D treatment planning system was capable of simulating the MMLC technique. For the second patient with a peanut-shaped tumor, the 3D treatment planning calculations were used to compare dose distributions for the MMLC and for traditional single and multiple isocenter treatments using circular collimators. The resulting integral dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the target volume, normal brain, and critical structures for the three treatment techniques were compared. Results: (a) Analysis of the film dosimetry data exemplified the degree of conformation of the high-dose region to the target shape that is possible with a computer-controlled MMLC. (b) Comparison of measured and calculated dose distributions indicates that the 3D treatment planning system can simulate the MMLC treatment. (c) Comparison of DVHs from the single isocenter MMLC and circular collimator treatments shows similar coverage of the target volume with increased dose to the brain for circular collimation (4). Comparison of DVHs from the single isocenter MMLC with the multiple isocenter circular collimator treatment approach shows a more inhomogeneous dose distribution through the target volume and increased dose to the brain for the latter. Conclusion: Dosimetry data for single isocenter treatments using computer-controlled field shaping with a MMLC demonstrate the ability to conform the dose distribution to an irregularly shaped target volume. DVHs validated that the single isocenter MMLC treatment is preferable to both single and multiple isocenter, circular collimator treatment because it provides a more uniform dose distribution to an irregularly shaped target volume and reduces the dose to surrounding brain tissue for the example cases.

Purpose: In radiotherapy planning, the clinical target volume (CTV) is typically enlarged to create a planning target volume (PTV) that accounts for uncertainties due to internal organ and patient motion as well as setup error. Margin size clearly determines the volume of normal tissue irradiated, yet in practice it is often given a set value in accordance with a clinical precedent from which variations are rare. The (CTV/PTV) formalism does not account for critical structure dose. We present a numerical simulation to assess (CTV) coverage and critical organ dose as a function of treatment margins in the presence of organ motion and physical setup errors. An application of the model to the treatment of prostate cancer is presented, but the method is applicable to any site where normal tissue tolerance is a dose-limiting factor. Methods and Materials: A Monte Carlo approach was used to simulate the cumulative effect of variation in overall tumor position, for individual treatment fractions, relative to a fixed distribution of dose. Distributions of potential dose-volume histograms (DVHs), for both tumor and normal tissues, are determined that fully quantify the stochastic nature of radiotherapy delivery. We introduce the concept of Probability of Prescription Dose (PoPD) isosurfaces as a tool for treatment plan optimization. Outcomes resulting from current treatment planning methods are compared with proposed techniques for treatment optimization. The standard planning technique of relatively large uniform margins applied to the CTV, in the beam's eye view (BEV), was compared with three other treatment strategies: (a) reduced uniform margins, (b) nonuniform margins adjusted to maximize normal tissue sparing, and (c) a reduced margin plan in which nonuniform fluence profiles were introduced to compensate for potential areas of reduced dose. Results: Results based on 100 simulated full course treatments indicate that a 10 mm CTV to PTV margin, combined with an additional 5 mm dosimetric margin, provides adequate CTV coverage in the presence of known treatment uncertainties. Nonuniform margins can be employed to reduce dose delivered to normal tissues while preserving CTV coverage. Nonuniform fluence profiles can also be used to further reduce dose delivered to normal tissues, though this strategy does result in higher dose levels delivered to a small volume of the CTV and normal tissues. Conclusions: Monte Carlo-based treatment simulation is an effective means of assessing the impact of organ motion and daily setup error on dose delivery via external beam radiation therpay. Probability of Prescription Dose (PoPD) isosurfaces are a useful tool for the determination of nonuniform beam margins that reduce dose delivered to critical organs while preserving (CTV) dose coverage. Nonuniform fluenc profiles can further alter critical organ dose with potential therapeutic benefits. Clinical consequences of this latter approach can only be assessed via clinical trials.

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a new modality that combines the accurate focal dose delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery with the biological advantages of conventional radiotherapy (1.8-2.0 Gy/day using 25-30 fractions). The modality requires sophisticated treatment planning, dedicated high-energy linear accelerator, and relocatable immobilization devices. We report here our early experience using stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial neoplasms.Between June 1992 and September 1993, we treated 82 patients with central nervous system lesions using stereotactic radiotherapy, delivered from a dedicated 6 MV stereotactic linear accelerator. A head fixation frame provided daily relocatable setup using a dental plate for all patients over 8 years of age. A modified head frame, which does not require a mouthpiece, was used for children requiring anesthesia. The patients ranged in age from 9 months to 76 years. Thirty-three patients were children less than 21 years of age. Selection criteria for the protocol included: (a) focal, small (5 cm) radiographically distinct lesions known to be radiocurable (pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma, pilocytic astrocytoma, retinoblastoma), and (b) lesions located in regions not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery such as the brain stem or chiasm. Standard fractionation and conventional doses were delivered. Patients with low-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, or ependymoma were treated using a dose escalation regime consisting of conventional doses plus a 10% increase.Although follow-up is 16 months (range 3-16 months), posttreatment radiographic studies in 77 patients have been consistent with changes similar to those found after conventional radiation therapy. To date, reduction of up to 50% of the original volume has been noted in 19 out of 77 patients, and 4 patients had a complete response, 2 with dysgerminoma, and 1 each with astrocytoma and retinoblastoma. In 56 patients disease was either stable or the follow-up was too short for evaluation. While the follow-up is relatively short, there have been no in-field or marginal recurrences. The only unexpected radiographic findings were in three patients with pilocytic astrocytomas, who developed asymptomatic edema in the treatment volume. Accuracy in daily fractionation was excellent. In over 2000 patient setups with 41,000 scalp measurements, reproducibility was found to be within 0.41 mm (median) of baseline readings, allowing for precise immobilization throughout the treatment course. The treatment in all cases was well tolerated with minimal acute effects. Our stereotactic radiotherapy facility can provide fractionated therapy for 10-12 patients a day efficiently and accurately.The treatment and relocatable stereotactic head frames were well tolerated with minimal acute effects. No long-term sequelae have been noted, although the observation period is short. To fully define the role of stereotactic radiotherapy, we are conducting prospective studies to evaluate neurocognitive and neuroendocrine effects. We expect that this innovative approach will make a significant impact on the treatment of intracranial neoplasms, particularly in children.

Purpose : We describe an image fusion application that addresses two basic problems that previously limited the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for geometric localization in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). The first limitation is imposed by the use of a relocatable, MRI-incompatible, stereotactic frame for stereotactic radiotherapy. The second limitation is an inherent lack of geometric fidelity in current MRI scanners that invalidates the use of MRI for stereotactic localization. Methods and Materials : We recently developed and implemented a novel automated method for fusing computerized tomography (CT) and MRI volumetric image studies. The method is based on a chamfer matching algorithm, and provides a quality assurance procedure to verify the accuracy of the fused image set. The image fusion protocol removes the need for stereotactic fixation of the patient for the MRI study. Results : The image fusion protocol significantly improves on the spatial accuracy of the MRI study. We demonstrate the effect of distortion and the effectiveness of the fusion with a phantom study. We present two case studies, an acoustic neurinoma treated with SRS. and a pilocytic astrocytoma treated with SRT. Conclusion : The image fusion protocol significantly improves our logistical management of treating patients with radiosurgery and makes conformal therapy practical for treating patients with SRT. The image fusion protocol demonstrates both the superior diagnostic quality and the poor geometric fidelity of MRI. MRI is a required imaging modality in stereotactic therapy. Image fusion combines the superior MRI diagnostic quality with the superior CT geometric definition, and makes the use of MRI in stereotactic therapy possible and practical.

Purpose: Stereotactic radiosurgery is becoming a more accepted treatment option for benign, deep seated intracranial lesions. However, little is known about the effects of large single fractions of radiation on cranial nerves. This study was undertaken to assess the effect of radiosurgery on the cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus. Methods and Materials: We examined the tolerance of cranial nerves (II–VI) following radiosurgery for 62 patients (4262 with meningiomas) treated for lesions within or near the cavernous sinus. Twenty-nine patients were treated with a modified 6 MV linear accelerator (Joint Center for Radiation Therapy) and 33 were treated with the Gamma Knife (University of Pittsburgh). Three-dimensional treatment plans were retrospectively reviewed and maximum doses were calculated for the cavernous sinus and the optic nerve and chiasm. Results: Median follow-up was 19 months (range 3–49). New cranial neuropathies developed in 12 patients from 3–41 months following radiosurgery. Four of these complications involved injury to the optic system and 8 (38 transient) were the result of injury to the sensory or motor nerves of the cavernous sinus. There was no clear relationship between the maximum dose to the cavernous sinus and the development of complications for cranial nerves III–VI over the dose range used (1000–4000 cGy). For the optic apparatus, there was a significantly increased incidence of complications with dose. Four of 17 patients (24°10) receiving greater than 800 cGy to any part of the optic apparatus developed visual complications compared with 035 who received less than 800 cGy ( P = 0.009). Conclusion: Radiosurgery using tumor-controlling doses of up to 4000 cGy appears to be a relatively safe technique in treating lesions within or near the sensory and motor nerves (III–VI) of the cavernous sinus. The dose to the optic apparatus should be limited to under 800 cGy.

Between 5/21/86 and 11/1/89, we treated 64 recurrent or inoperable intracranial tumors in 60 patients (40 primary, 24 metastatic) with stereotactic radiosurgery using a modified 6 MeV linear accelerator at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy. Patients were followed until death or 1/1/90. The median follow-up was 8 months (2-43 months). Fourteen patients experienced complications from 12 hours to 7 months (median 3 months, but only two patients more than 4 months) following radiosurgery. To determine variables related to complication, we calculated integral dose-volume histograms for 61/64 lesions and the surrounding CT-defined normal tissue. We excluded 16 lesions in 15 patients for follow-up less than 4 months (12 patients) or insufficient treatment information (3 patients). The variables for which higher values were associated with significantly more toxicity in a univariate score test were: a) tumor dose inhomogeneity (p less than 0.00001), b) maximum tumor dose (p = 0.00002), c) number of isocenters (p = 0.00002), d) maximum normal tissue dose (p = 0.00005) and e) tumor volume (p = 0.0001). These variables were all highly correlated with tumor dose inhomogeneity (coefficients of rank correlation 0.75-0.81). Tumor dose inhomogeneity had a much higher loglikelihood in a logistic model than any other single variable and a higher loglikelihood than any other two variables combined. None of the 21 patients with metastatic lesions experienced a complication. When we excluded the metastatic lesions, the above five variables remained significant in univariate tests. The mean tumor dose, number of treatment arcs, total degrees of arc, tumor location, previous radiotherapy, tumor geometry, pretreatment performance status, collimator size, and age were not significantly associated with toxicity. We conclude that radiosurgery of intracranial tumors is associated with a low risk of complications for lesions less than 10cc treated with a single isocenter to maximum tumor doses less than 25 Gy with tumor dose inhomogeneity less than 10 Gy, but that treatment of larger lesions will require new treatment strategies which reduce the tumor dose inhomogeneity associated with multiple isocenter treatments.

Abtract of paper presented 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology 2013.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for small, localized, pediatric brain tumors and to determine the patterns of failure. Methods and materials A total of 81 patients were enrolled in an institutional review board–approved prospective Dana-Farber Cancer Institute protocol between 1992 and 1998. Of the 81 patients, 50 had low-grade astrocytoma, 23 had residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma, 4 had posterior fossa ependymoma, and 4 had other histologic types. All patients underwent biopsy for diagnosis, with the exception of patients with neurofibromatosis and radiographic evidence of an optic system tumor. The neurocognitive outcome for all patients was also an endpoint of the study and will be reported separately. This report focused on the patients with low-grade gliomas only. Of the 50 patients, 26 were males and 24 females; the median age was 9 years (range, 2–26 years). The indications for treatment of patients with low-grade gliomas were progression during or after chemotherapy or progression after surgery alone. SRT was delivered using a dedicated 6-MV linear accelerator. Immobilization was accomplished with a removable head-frame. CT and MRI fusion was used for treatment planning. The target volume generally included the preoperative tumor plus a 2-mm margin for the planning target volume. The median collimator size was 47.25 mm (range, 30–60 mm). Three to nine arcs were used to deliver a mean total dose of 52.2 Gy in 1.8-Gy daily fractions. Results With a median follow-up of 6.9 years (range, 0.9–10.2 years), the progression-free survival rate was 82.5% at 5 years and 65% at 8 years. The overall survival was 97.8% at 5 years and 82% at 8 years. Six patients had local progression. Two of the patients with local progression had pathologic progression to anaplastic astrocytoma 3 and 7 years after initial SRT. Five patients, all with optic system/hypothalamic primary tumors, developed central nervous system dissemination 1.0–7.4 years after SRT. One patient developed a presumed radiation-induced primitive neuroectodermal tumor 6 years after initial treatment. Six patients died, three of dissemination, two of progression to higher grade tumors, and one of a secondary radiation-induced tumor. All 6 cases of local progression were within the primary tumor bed at the time of progression and had received the full prescription dose. No marginal failures occurred. Conclusion Stereotactic radiotherapy provides excellent local control for children with small, localized low-grade glial tumors. Marginal failures have not been observed, supporting the use of limited margins to minimize late sequelae using stereotactic immobilization and planning techniques.

Purpose/Objective(s): A new intra-uterine tandem design is proposed for creating non-isotropic 192-Ir dose distribution and give unprecedented dose conformality for treatment of cervical cancer. Materials/Methods: A DMBT design was made of non-magnetic high density tungsten alloy (18.0g/cc) cylinder with 6 peripheral grooves running along the length for an 192-Ir HDR afterloader source to travel along. The groove has 1.3mm in diameter and evenly distributed on the tungsten alloy, which has a diameter of 5.4mm. The tungsten alloy is enclosed in a total diameter of 6.4mm polyoxymethylene tube (1.41 g/ cc). For calculating dose distribution, 51 million decay events are simulated on Monte Carlo simulation and resulting non-isotropic dose distributions. 75 plans (5 fraction [fx] of 15 patient cases), clinically treated with conventional tandem & ovoids (T&O) applicator, were replanned on an in-house development HDR brachytherapy planning platform, which is intensity modulated planning capability using Simulated Annealing and Constrained-Gradient Optimization algorithms. All DMBT plan results were compared against the T&O clinically treated plans, which were normalized to match the HRCTV V100 coverage. Also all the plans were optimized with the same ovoids in place as the conventional T&O plans. Results: Generally, the plan qualities were markedly better using DMBT. Among the 75 plans, an average bladder, rectum, and sigmoid dose (D2cc) reduction were 0.59 0.87 Gy (8.5 28.7%), 0.48 0.55 Gy (21.1 27.2%), 0.10 0.38 Gy (40.6 214.9%) among the 75 plans, respectively. The bladder dose, 3.20Gy (40.8%), was the best single plan reduction, due to the horseshoe-like bladder around the CTV. The best sigmoid dose reduction was 1.26Gy (27.5%) for endophytic growth type cervical cancer. Overall, the most dose reduction was caused by the dose flexibility of DMBT. The HRCTV D90 was similar with 6.55 0.96 Gy for T&O and 6.59 1.06 for DMBT. Conclusions: The new tandem designs that advance the conformality of image-guided cervix HDR were created in congruence with the current trend of 3D image based planning to maximize the therapeutic ratio. Author Disclosure: D. Han: None. M.J. Webster: None. D.J. Scanderbeg: None. C. Yashar: None. D. Choi: None. B. Song: None. S. Devic: None. A. Ravi: None. W.Y. Song: None.

Purpose: Intracranial germ cell tumors are rare, radiosensitive tumors seen most commonly in the second and third decades of life. Radiotherapy alone has been the primary treatment modality for germinomas, and is used with chemotherapy for nongerminomatous tumors. Stereotactic radiotherapy techniques minimize the volume of surrounding normal tissue irradiated and, hence, the late radiation morbidity. This study reports our experience with stereotactic radiotherapy in this group of tumors. Methods and Materials: Between December 1992 and December 1998, 18 patients with intracranial germ cell tumors were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. A total of 23 histologically proven tumors were treated. Thirteen patients had a histologic diagnosis of germinoma, and 5 patients had germinoma with nongerminomatous elements. Of those patients with a histologic diagnosis of germinoma, 5 had multiple midline tumors. The median age of the patients was 12.9 years (range, 5.6–17.5 years). Results: A boost using stereotactic radiotherapy was delivered to 19 tumors following whole-brain radiation in 8 cases and craniospinal radiation in 11 cases. Three tumors were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy to the tumor volume alone following chemotherapy, and 1 tumor received a boost using stereotactic radiosurgery following craniospinal radiation. A median dose of 2520 cGy (range, 1500–3600) cGy was given to the whole brain, and a median dose of 2160 (range, 2100–2600) cGy was given to the spinal field. The median boost dose to the tumor was 2600 (range, 2160–3600) cGy, given by stereotactic radiotherapy delivered to the 95% isodose line. At a median follow-up time of 40 (range, 12–73) months, no local or marginal recurrences were reported in patients with germinoma. Two patients with nongerminomatous tumors have relapsed. One had elevation of tumor markers only at 37 months following treatment, and the other had persistent disease following chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Eight patients documented pituitary-hypothalamic dysfunction; in 7 (87.5%) of these patients, the dysfunction was present before commencing radiotherapy. Four patients (22%) developed newly diagnosed diabetes insipidus following surgery. Three patients (17%) received antidepressant medication at follow-up. Conclusion: Our series shows that stereotactic radiotherapy is achievable and well tolerated in this group of patients. Longer follow-up is required to fully assess the impact on long-term toxicity. Psychologic assessment of mood and affect should be performed as part of routine follow-up in this group of adolescent children.

To describe the outcome of pediatric brain tumor patients following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and factors associated with progression-free survival.We reviewed the outcome of 90 children treated with SRS for recurrent (n = 62) or residual (n = 28) brain tumors over a 10-year period. Median follow-up from SRS was 24 months for all patients and 55.5 months for the 34 patients currently alive.The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 13 months. Median PFS according to tumor histology was medulloblastoma = 11 months, ependymoma = 8.5 months, glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma = 12 months. Median PFS in patients treated to a single lesion was 15.4 months. No patient undergoing SRS to more than 1 lesion survived disease free beyond 2 years. After adjusting for histology and other clinical factors, SRS for tumor recurrence (RR = 2.49) and the presence of1 lesion (RR = 2.3) were associated with a significantly increased rate of progression (p0.05). Three-year actuarial local control (LC) was as follows: medulloblastoma = 57%, ependymoma = 29%, anaplastic astrocytoma/glioblastoma = 60%, other histologies = 56%. Nineteen patients with radionecrosis and progressive neurologic symptoms underwent reoperation after an interval of 0.6-62 months following SRS. Pathology revealed necrosis with no evidence of tumor in 9 of these cases.SRS can be given safely to selected children with brain tumors. SRS appears to reduce the proportion of first failures occurring locally and is associated with better outcome when given as a part of initial management. Some patients with unresectable relapsed disease can be salvaged with SRS. SRS to multiple lesions does not appear to be curative. Serious neurologic symptoms requiring reoperation is infrequently caused by radionecrosis alone.

Purpose: The clinical utility of an interventional magnetic resonance (IMR)-guided implant technique with real-time dosimetric feedback is presented. Methods and Materials: The work was carried out at a IMR unit at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Planning and dosimetric feedback were provided by a software system that provides an interface to the IMR images, anatomy demarcation, template registration, dose calculation engine for planning, and evaluating the implant. Planning during the procedure permits the incorporation of actual needle trajectories in the dose calculations. Results: Fifteen patients were planned in the treatment position. During source placement, actual needle locations were incorporated into the dose calculations. After accounting for the observed needle trajectories of the planned needles, 14 of 15 patients (93%) required additional sources to achieve the desired coverage of the target volume. Conclusion: A brachytherapy implant procedure which provides clinically significant advances has been implemented. Specifically, the planning system allows dosimetric validation of the needle placement. This procedure is effective in delivering brachytherapy to the target volume and assuring that the implant is delivered in accordance with the preplan. The dosimetric feedback could be incorporated in ultrasound-guided implants.

Purpose : Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) combines techniques of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with radiation therapy fractionation schemes. Fractionation in SRT necessitates a relocatable immobilization system to precisely reproduce the patient's position at each treatment. The Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) head frame is such an immobilization device compatible with the Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) stereotactic system. We describe this device, our modifications to the original design, the repeat position accuracy, and the daily verification procedure. Methods and Materials : The original GTC frame was tested on volunteers. This testing led to an improved strapping system, the decision to construct the oral fixation appliance at our dental clinic, and the construction of a depth confirmation helmet to rapidly confirm the position of the frame on a daily basis. The GTC frame, at our institution, is not acceptable for children requiring anesthesia, and a new frame, the “Boston Childrens' Hospital” frame, was designed. This device uses the base ring of the GTC frame. Airway access is maintained through fixation on the nasal-glabellar region and the ear canal rather than the hard palate and upper gingiva. Results : The modifications of the GTC frame and the verification protocol result in repeat positioning of the frame with respect to the patient anatomy, with a standard deviation of 0.4 mm for both the modified GTC frame and the Boston Childrens' Hospital frame. The relocatibility of the frames has been established in over 2,000 patient setups in over 60 patients to date. Discussion : The GTC frame is a noninvasive and versatile fixation system that provides patient comfort, as well as accurate relocatibility for SRT. The frame is not appropriate for single fraction radiosurgery, as a large setup error (> 2 mm) for a single treatment cannot be excluded. The GTC frame is compatible with the BRW system, and treatment planning for SRT and SRS patients is identical. We currently treat 10–13 SRT patients per day with intracranial neoplasms on a dedicated stereotactic therapy unit. In addition, the Boston Childrens' Hospital frame allows the use of stereotactic therapy in the treatment of children under 6 years of age. This population will benefit especially from precise and highly focal cranial irradiation.

Purpose: This work assesses the relative field shaping advantages of dynamic field shaping devices for stereotactic radiosurgery using a linear accelerator. Methods and Materials: We selected 43 intracranial tumors (2.0–4.2 cm maximum dimension, 1.5–25.5 cc tumor volume) out of the first 64 intracranial tumors treated with radiosurgery at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy. We modeled five field shaping devices, each including a fixed auxilliary circular collimator: (a) fixed circular collimator alone; (b) two independent parallel jaws; (c) four independent rectangular jaws; (d) four independent rotatable jaws; and (e) "ideal" multileaf collimator. We adjusted the model parameters until the minimum target isodose was 80% of the dose delivered to isocenter. We defined the treatment volume ratio as the target volume divided by the treatment volume (volume receiving at feast the minimum target dose). We used the treatment volume ratio to compare the five models and the actual patient treatments. Results: For 34 tumors originally treated with one isocenter, the median Treatment Volume Ratio was higher for all of the device models except the fixed circular collimator compared to the actual patient treatments. For the nine tumors originally treated with multiple isocenters, the median Treatment Volume Ratio for the actual multiple isocenter treatments was similar to that for two parallel jaws, four rectangular jaws and four rotatable jaws. Only the median "ideal" collimator treatment volume ratio was higher for these nine tumors. Conclusion: Simple field shaping devices have approximately 50% of the conformal advantage of an "ideal" multileaf collimator. Approximately 50% of typical radiosurgical tumors between 2 and 4 cm have field shaping advantages which exceed the geometrical uncertainties inherent in linear accelerator radiosurgery treatments. The three models, two parallel, four rectangular, or four rotatable independent jaws would improve current linear accelerator technology by providing homogeneous doses with equivalent field shaping for most tumors originally treated with inhomogeneous multiple isocenter plans (69 tumors in the current series).

Stereotactic radiosurgery of intra-cranial lesions is a treatment modality where a well defined target volume receives a high radiation dose in a single treatment. Our technique delivers this dose using a set of non-coplanar arcs and small circular collimators. We use a standard linear accelerator in our treatments, and the adjustable treatment parameters are: isocenter location, gantry arc rotation interval, couch angle, collimator field size, and dose. The treatment planning phase of the treatment determines these parameters such that the target volume is sufficiently irradiated, and dose to surrounding healthy tissue and critical, dose-limiting structures is minimized. The attachment of a BRW localizing frame to the patient's cranium combined with CT imaging (and optionally MRI or angiography) provides the required accuracy for localizing individual structures in the treatment volume. The treatment is fundamentally 3-dimensional and requires a volumetric assessment of the treatment plan. The selection of treatment arcs relies primarily on geometric constraints and the beam's eye view concept to avoid irradiating critical structures. The assessment of a treatment plan involves isodose distributions throughout the volume and integral dose-volume histograms. We present the essential concepts of our treatment planning approach, and illustrate these in three clinical cases.

The inverse problem in radiation therapy presents a solution for a fluence distribution based on the specification of a region of dose in a patient. We show results for one such solution based on the inversion of an integral over a function of the fluence profile of a rotating beam. We use Monte Carlo methods and numerical integrations to evaluate dose distributions obtained with the inverse method and show the limitations of this theoretical approach. Our results show that dose to a single circular region at an arbitrary position in a 2-dimensional volume can be calculated. Uniform dose to arbitrarily shaped regions cannot be calculated with this formalism, although practical solutions can still be obtained.

Objective: Current prostatic brachytherapy implant procedures use ultrasound imaging for geometric guidance during surgery, with pre-surgical planning based on ultrasound images and post-surgical dosimetry based on computed tomography (CT). This procedure suffers from the poor soft-tissue contrast of ultrasound and CT and problems inherent in the repositioning of the patient at surgery. We have designed and implemented an integrated real-time imaging and treatment-planning software system that combines the superior soft-tissue contrast of magnetic resonance (MR) images with the real-time acquisition of those images for localization, verification, and dosimetric purposes. The system permits the surgeon and patient to complete all phases of treatment in one setting.Materials and Methods: We utilize an intra-operative MR unit that permits real-time imaging and stereotactic localization during a surgical procedure. Our software system integrates with the unit and features (i) a calibration schema to calibrate...