Search

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) prosthesis as a treatment option after mandibular condyle fracture. Three databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) and 2670 unique papers were identified. A total of 337 studies were included (121 case reports, 89 case series, and 127 cohort/clinical studies). In total 14,396 patients and 21,560 prostheses were described. Of the 127 cohort or clinical studies, 100 (79%) reported inclusion criteria, 54 (43%) reported exclusion criteria, and 96 (76%) reported the inclusion period. The base population from which patients were recruited was reported in 57 studies (45%). The reason for TMJ prosthesis implantation was reported for 4177 patients (29.0%). A history of condylar fracture was present in 83 patients (2.0%); a history of mandibular trauma was present in 580 patients (13.9%). The meta-analysis showed a pooled prevalence of condylar fracture of 1.6% (95% confidence interval 0.9-2.4%) and a pooled prevalence of trauma or condylar fracture of 11.3% (95% confidence interval 7.1-16.0%). Heterogeneity was highly significant (P < 0.001). The TMJ prosthesis appears to be reserved for patients with persistent pain, bony or fibrous ankylosis, or osteomyelitis after primary closed or open treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This prospective analysis was performed to assess the long-term benefits of the TMJ Concepts joint replacement system in the UK. All patients who had replacement temporomandibular joints (TMJ) with at least 10 years of follow-up were included. The most common primary diagnoses were trauma, multiple previous operations, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, degenerative disease, and ankylosis. A total of 43 patients (62 joints) were followed up for 10 years (mean age 45, range 22-70 years); 39 were female and four were male. The mean number of previous TMJ procedures was 2.5 (range 0-10). Over the 10 years of follow-up, there were significant improvements in pain score (10-point scale; decreased from 7.4 to 1.7), maximum mouth opening (increased from 21.0 mm to 34.7 mm), and dietary score (10-point scale; increased from 4.1 to 9.5). Joints in two patients failed, one secondary to a local dental infection and one due to reankylosis. None failed due to wear of the prosthesis, whether the prosthesis was standard cobalt-chrome or all-titanium. Total TMJ replacement gives good long-term improvements, both lessening pain and improving function, and is an effective form of management for irreparably damaged joints., (Copyright © 2021 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)