Search

Aim: To investigate whether a novel decision support tool would effectively minimize physical restraint use in critically ill adult patients. Design A nonequivalent quasi‐experimental design combined with a descriptive qualitative approach was used. Methods: A Restraint Decision Tree was developed based on a qualitative study that explored the barriers to employ the Restraint Decision Wheel. During the quasi‐experimental study, patients admitted to the unit between October 2017 and March 2018 were enrolled as the control group receiving the Restraint Decision Wheel (n = 528), whereas patients between April 2018 and September 2018 were enrolled as the intervention group receiving the Restraint Decision Tree (n = 564). The physical restraint rate, accidental catheter removal rate and nurses' satisfaction were compared. Results: The Restraint Decision Tree significantly decreased physical restraint use. No significant difference in the rate of accidental catheter removal was found. Nurses reported increased satisfaction with the restraint decision‐making. Conclusions: The Restraint Decision Tree could minimize physical restraint use. Physicians' involvement in the restraint decision‐making and nurses' competence in delirium assessment may be essential for successful implementation of the Restraint Decision Tree. Summary statement: What is already known about this topic? Physical restraint is a common practice in the intensive care unit.Minimizing physical restraint use does not increase the risk of catheter self‐removal.Nurses equipped with clinical decision‐making skills could promote the appropriateness of restraint application. What this paper adds? The Restraint Decision Tree could help nurses make appropriate restraint decisions for critically ill adult patients, thus decreasing the use of physical restraint.Multidisciplinary decision‐making improves nurses' satisfaction with the restraint decision process. The implications of this paper: This study suggests that the Restraint Decision Tree can be implemented in the intensive care unit as an effective decision‐making tool to decrease physical restraint use while maintaining patient safety.A strong culture of multidisciplinary collaboration and delirium screening is called for prior to utilizing the Restraint Decision Tree. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: This study aimed to describe the experiences of nurses and other health care workers who were infected with coronavirus disease 2019. Methods: An empirical phenomenological approach was used. Sixteen participants were recruited in Wuhan using purposive and snowball sampling. Semistructured, in‐depth interviews were conducted by telephone in February 2020. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed following Colaizzi's method. Results: Two themes emerged: (1) Intense emotional distress since becoming infected. Participants were fearful of spreading the virus to family and overwhelmed by a lack of information, experienced uncertainty and worried about treatment, felt lonely during isolation and reported moral distress about inadequate health care staffing. (2) Coping strategies were needed. They tried their best to address negative psychological reactions using their professional knowledge and gaining support from others and community resources. Conclusions: Preparedness for catastrophic events and providing timely and accurate information are major considerations in government policy development, related to pandemics and adequacy of health care personnel. Mental health resources and support, both short‐ and long‐term should be anticipated for health care providers to alleviate their fear and anxiety. Summary statement: What is already known about this topic? Health care workers, including nurses, are at the frontlines of the COVID‐19 outbreak and at high risk of infection.Experts have called for infection prevention for health care providers.Limited research has reported the experiences of health care workers infected by COVID‐19 using an empirical phenomenological approach. What this paper adds? Upon diagnosis, nurses and other health care workers experienced fear, uncertainty and distress like general patients.Health care workers reported moral distress about inadequate health care staffing issues.Health care workers could cope with their negative psychological reactions using professional knowledge and support from significant others and the community. The implications of this paper: Preparedness for large‐scale pandemics and a system that can provide openness and timely information needs consideration in policy development.Accurate information and good communication are vital to support infected health care workers and enhance their sense of safety and belonging.Long‐term support should be available when these health care workers return to work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]