Search

The NAC family of transcription factors includes no apical meristem (NAM), Arabidopsis thaliana transcription activator 1/2 (ATAF1/2), and cup-shaped cotyledon (CUC2) proteins, which are unique to plants, contributing significantly to their adaptation to environmental challenges. In the present study, we observed that the PvNAC52 protein is predominantly expressed in the cell membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus. Overexpression of PvNAC52 in Arabidopsis strengthened plant resilience to salt, alkali, osmotic, and ABA stresses. PvNAC52 significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the degree of oxidative damage to cell membranes, proline content, and plant water loss by increasing the expression of MSD1, FSD1, CSD1, POD, PRX69, CAT, and P5CS2. Moreover, the expression of genes associated with abiotic stress responses, such as SOS1, P5S1, RD29A, NCED3, ABIs, LEAs, and DREBs, was enhanced by PvNAC52 overexpression. A yeast one-hybrid assay showed that PvNAC52 specifically binds to the cis-acting elements ABRE (abscisic acid-responsive elements, ACGTG) within the promoter. This further suggests that PvNAC52 is responsible for the transcriptional modulation of abiotic stress response genes by identifying the core sequence, ACGTG. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for the further analysis of the targeted cis-acting elements and genes downstream of PvNAC52 in the common bean.

α-Ketoglutarate decarboxylase is a crucial enzyme in the tricarboxylic acid cycle of cyanobacteria, catalyzing the non-oxidative decarboxylation of α-ketoglutarate to produce succinate semialdehyde and CO2. The decarboxylation process is reliant on the cofactor of thiamine diphosphate. However, this enzyme’s biochemical and structural properties have not been well characterized. In this work, two α-ketoglutarate decarboxylases encoded by MAE_06010 and MiAbw_01735 genes from Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843 (MaKGD) and NIES-4325 (MiKGD), respectively, were overexpressed and purified by using an Escherichia coli expression system. It was found that MaKGD exhibited 9.2-fold higher catalytic efficiency than MiKGD, which may be attributed to the absence of glutamate decarboxylase in Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843. Further biochemical investigation of MaKGD demonstrated that it displayed optimum activity at pH 6.5–7.0 and was most activated by Mg2+. Additionally, MaKGD showed substrate specificity towards α-ketoglutarate. Structural modeling and autodocking results revealed that the active site of MaKGD contained a distinct binding pocket where α-ketoglutarate and thiamine diphosphate interacted with specific amino acid residues via hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonds and salt bridges. Furthermore, the mutagenesis study provided strong evidence supporting the importance of certain residues in the catalysis of MaKGD. These findings provide new insights into the structure-function relationships of α-ketoglutarate decarboxylases from cyanobacteria.

The enzyme encoded by slr1022 gene from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 was reported to function as N-acetylornithine aminotransferase, γ-aminobutyric acid aminotransferase, and ornithine aminotransferase, which played important roles in multiple metabolic pathways. Among these functions, N-acetylornithine aminotransferase catalyzes the reversible conversion of N-acetylornithine to N-acetylglutamate-5-semialdehyde with PLP as cofactor, which is a key step in the arginine biosynthesis pathway. However, the investigation of the detailed kinetic characteristics and catalytic mechanism of Slr1022 has not been carried out yet. In this study, the exploration of kinetics of recombinant Slr1022 illustrated that Slr1022 mainly functioned as N-acetylornithine aminotransferase with low substrate specificity to γ-aminobutyric acid and ornithine. Kinetic assay of Slr1022 variants and the model structure of Slr1022 with N-acetylornithine-PLP complex revealed that Lys280 and Asp251 residues were the key amino acids of Slr1022. The respective mutation of the above two residues to Ala resulted in the activity depletion of Slr1022. Meanwhile, Glu223 residue was involved in substrate binding and it served as a switch between the two half reactions. Other residues such as Thr308, Gln254, Tyr39, Arg163, and Arg402 implicated a substrate recognition and catalytic process of the reaction. The results of this study further enriched the understanding of the catalytic kinetics and mechanism of N-acetylornithine aminotransferase, especially from cyanobacteria.

Abiotic stresses adversely affect plant growth and the yield of crops worldwide. R2R3-MYB transcriptional factors have been found to be vital for plants to confer stress response. In Arabidopsis, FOUR LIPS (FLP, MYB124) and its paralogous MYB88 function redundantly regulated the symmetric division of guard mother cells (GMCs) and abiotic stress response. Here, OsFLP was identified as an R2R3-MYB transcriptional activator and localized in the nucleus. OsFLP was transiently induced by drought, salt stress and abscisic acid (ABA). Overexpression of OsFLP showed enhanced tolerance to drought and salt stresses. The stomatal density in OsFLP-OE plants was not changed, whereas the stomatal closure was sensitive to ABA treatment compared to wild-type plants. In contrast, OsFLP-RNAi plants had abnormal stomata and were sensitive to drought. Moreover, the transcripts of stomatal closure-related genes DST and peroxidase 24 precursor, which are identified as downstream of OsNAC1, were inhibited in OsFLP-RNAi plants. The yeast-one-hybrid assay indicated that OsFLP can specifically bind and positively regulate OsNAC1 and OsNAC6. Meanwhile, stress response genes, such as OsLEA3 and OsDREB2A, were up-regulated in OsFLP-OE plants. These findings suggested that OsFLP positively participates in drought stress, mainly through regulating regulators’ transcripts of OsNAC1 and OsNAC6.

The moss Physcomitrella patens is a model system for studying plant developmental processes. ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3 (ABI3), a transcription factor of the ABA signaling pathway, plays an important role in plant growth and development in vascular plant. To understand the regulatory mechanism of ABA and PpABI3 on vegetative development in Physcomitrella patens, we applied physiological, cellular, and RNA-seq analyses in wild type (WT) plants and ∆abi3 mutants. During ABA treatment, the growth of gametophytes was inhibited to a lesser extent ∆abi3 plants compared with WT plants. Microscopic observation indicated that the differentiation of caulonemata from chloronemata was accelerated in ∆abi3 plants when compared with WT plants, with or without 10 μM of ABA treatment. Under normal conditions, auxin concentration in ∆abi3 plants was markedly higher than that in WT plants. The auxin induced later differentiation of caulonemata from chloronemata, and the phenotype of ∆abi3 plants was similar to that of WT plants treated with exogenous indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). RNA-seq analysis showed that the PpABI3-regulated genes overlapped with genes regulated by the ABA treatment, and about 78% of auxin-related genes regulated by the ABA treatment overlapped with those regulated by PpABI3. These results suggested that ABA affected vegetative development partly through PpABI3 regulation in P. patens; PpABI3 is a negative regulator of vegetative development in P. patens, and the vegetative development regulation by ABA and PpABI3 might occur by regulating the expression of auxin-related genes. PpABI3 might be associated with cross-talk between ABA and auxin in P. patens.

Like other organisms, plants have endogenous biological clocks that enable them to organize their metabolic, physiological, and developmental processes. The representative biological clock is the circadian system that regulates daily (24-h) rhythms. Circadian-regulated changes in growth have been observed in numerous plants. Evidence from many recent studies indicates that the circadian clock regulates a multitude of factors that affect plant metabolites, especially emitted volatiles that have important ecological functions. Here, we review recent progress in research on plant volatiles showing rhythmic emission under the regulation of the circadian clock, and on how the circadian clock controls the rhythmic emission of plant volatiles. We also discuss the potential impact of other factors on the circadian rhythmic emission of plant volatiles.