1. Predictive performance of eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases
- Author
-
Xinlan Zhou, Zongguo Yang, Zhanqing Zhang, Xin Ma, Wei Lu, Yanbing Wang, Dan Huang, Rongrong Ding, and Xiufen Li
- Subjects
Adult ,Blood Platelets ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,GPR ,Liver fibrosis ,Inflammation ,Chronic liver disease ,Gastroenterology ,Severity of Illness Index ,End Stage Liver Disease ,Liver Function Tests ,Fibrosis ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,liver fibrosis ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Receiver operating characteristic ,business.industry ,eLIFT ,chronic liver disease ,Reproducibility of Results ,General Medicine ,gamma-Glutamyltransferase ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Decision curve analysis ,ROC Curve ,Liver biopsy ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Biomarkers ,Research Paper - Abstract
Objective: The easy liver fibrosis test (eLIFT) is a novel predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in CLD patients. Methods: We enrolled 1125 patients with CLD who underwent liver biopsy. The predictive accuracy for liver inflammation and fibrosis of the eLIFT was assessed and compared to that of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) by ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) of the eLIFT for assessing liver inflammation G ≥ 2 and G ≥ 3 were 0.77 (0.75-0.80) and 0.81 (0.79-0.84), with cut-offs of 8.0 and 11.0, respectively. The AUROCs of the eLIFT for predicting fibrosis stages S ≥ 2 and S4 were 0.72 (0.70-0.76) and 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with cut-offs of 9.0 and 10.0, respectively. In discriminating G≥2 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was better than that of the FIB-4, with no difference compared with the GPR, but lower than that of the APRI. When discriminating G≥3 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was comparable to that of the APRI and GPR but superior to that of the FIB-4. There were no significant differences between the four indexes for predicting S≥2 and S4. Conclusion: The eLIFT is a potentially useful noninvasive predictor of liver inflammation and fibrosis in patients with CLD.
- Published
- 2021