Search

Introduction: Integrated care has been posited as a potential solution to the global burden of youth mental health (YMH), but there is limited evidence on how best to design, staff, and evaluate different integrated care models. Our review aimed to consolidate the evidence on integrated models of mental healthcare for young people, to identify the core components of integration, and create a framework that can be used to analyse levels of YMH integration. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of literature across PubMed, SCOPUS, and PsycINFO databases and the grey literature We performed a narrative synthesis extracting core components of integrated YMH care. Results: Inductive themes from the literature described core components of integrated care. These themes were mapped into a novel framework combining the World Health Organisation health system building blocks and six intensity levels of integrated care to consider how best to implement and sustain integrated care within the YMH system. Discussion: The Youth Integration Project framework can form a basis for the development, implementation and evaluation of well-articulated models of youth integrated mental health pathways, assisting services identify what operational changes are needed to best implement and sustain integrated care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Kids Guided Personalised Service (KidsGPS) is an integrated model of care coordination for children and young people (CYP) living with medical complexity. After successful implementation in an urban setting, the model of care will be rolled-out at scale to four rural regions in New South Wales, Australia to establish RuralKidsGPS. This paper describes the approach and methods for the outcome and implementation evaluation of RuralKidsGPS. Description: The evaluation aims to assess health, economic and implementation outcomes and processes whilst identifying barriers and enablers to inform future rollouts. Measures of health service utilisation (primary outcome), child health related quality of life and parent/carer experiences will be assessed. The implementation evaluation will occur alongside the outcomes evaluation and is underpinned by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and informed by validated quantitative measures and qualitative interviews with patients, families, healthcare providers and service managers. An economic analysis will determine incremental cost effectiveness ratios for the new model of care using health service utilisation data. Conclusion: RuralKidsGPS, if effective, has the potential to improve equity of access to integrated care for CYP and their families and this protocol may inform other evaluations of similar models of care delivered at scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic, non-communicable disease, accounts for the vast majority of all disability adjusted life years lost (DALYS), among children and young people in high income countries. Our current model of hospital-centred paediatric care was developed to deliver acute inpatient and high intensity specialist services rather than high quality care for children and young people (CYP) with long-term conditions. The CYPHP Evelina London model was developed with key stakeholders including CYP, carers, front line practitioners and health service commissioners in response to these evolving health care needs. The CYPHP Evelina London model is an innovative approach to reshaping everyday healthcare services, expanding on the principles of integrated care. CYPHP brings together physical and mental healthcare, addresses the social context of families, integrates primary and secondary healthcare, and links healthcare with local government efforts to improve the wider determinants of health. A major focus of the CYPHP Evelina London model is improving front line care for all CYP. Methods: The CYPHP model will be rolled out in phases, allowing an opportunistic evaluation using a cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (cRCT) design involving 90,000 children and young people in 23 clusters. The evaluation has four component parts: 1- Pseudonymised population-based evaluation for all children and young people in participating GP practices to assess health service use; 2- An evaluation of consented children with asthma, eczema, and constipation to assess impact on health-related quality of life, parental-reported disease severity, prevalence and severity of mental health difficulties, and mental wellbeing among parents, using validated questionnaires. 3- A mixed-methods process evaluation to understand the barriers and facilitators to implementing the model of care; 4- Economic evaluation. Results: Initial baseline results from the first 219 Health Checks showed poorly controlled symptoms for asthma, eczema and constipation in between 60 and 76% of young people. In total, 28% of CYP scored 'High'/'Very High' on Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaire for mental health difficulties. Over a quarter of families reported problems paying bills and 12% of parents expressed concerns regarding their own mental health. Discussion: The ongoing CYPHP evaluation is the largest population based evaluation of a pediatrics integrated care model to date in the UK. We will discuss the need for robust evaluation in the space of health transformation using CYPHP as an exemplar. Conclusions: Initial results show high levels of unmet physical, psychological and social needs in children and young people with common and chronic illness. Clinical academic partnerships are key to robust evaluation of health service models at scale. Lessons learned: The difficulties, of carrying out a large randomised controlled trial of a health systems transformation programme across two London Boroughs including partnership working, funding models, ethics approval and recruitment will be discussed. Limitations: Though final results are not available, initial results show high levels of unmet need in our population which the CYPHP model of care is meeting. Suggestions for future research: Robust evaluation using experimental designs is possible and needed in the health systems space. These evaluations at scale will inform new health system design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Children and young people's (CYP) health and healthcare outcomes are often poor. Demand for urgent healthcare is rising. The current model of care is primarily reactive and acute rather than proactive and preventative; leading to increased use and reliance on secondary healthcare services. Over the past 5 years there has been increases in non-elective admissions and attendances and outpatient appointments (1.7%, 3% and 3.2%). At a population level, these small increases incur increasing financial cost and burden on services already at capacity. The clinicalacademic Children and Young People's Health Partnership (CYPHP) is delivers new care models to improve CYP health; with evaluation using robust designs to determine the extent the new model of care is curbing rising healthcare use. Methods: CYPHP is a partnership between 3 large NHS Trusts, including mental health and children's, 2 Clinical Commissioning Groups and Local Authorities, and a University. Model design included analysis of segmented population need, systematic literature reviews, and extensive engagement with CYP, parents, health professionals, providers, and commissioners. An evidencebased implementation plan was agreed to roll out services to a child population of 120,000. We are opportunistically evaluating the service using a cluster randomised control trial (cRCT) design. Results: We are implementing and evaluating an evidence-based comprehensive new child and family-centred integrated cycle of care including individual and population health promotion; proactive case-finding and triage for ongoing conditions at a population-level; biopsychosocial assessment and self-referral via a patient portal; holistic tailored care, specialist clinics and increased education and training for professionals working with CYP. Services are delivered by multidisciplinary health teams to increase coordination across primary, community, and hospital settings and to better integrate physical and mental healthcare for CYP's social context. The cRCT evaluation design, with nested process evaluation and qualitative studies, will provide high quality evidence of the impact of the CYPHP model on outcomes including CYP health and wellbeing, healthcare quality, and health service and system measures. Implications: CYPHP is implementing and evaluating a new model of care to improve health, heathcare quality, and outcomes for local CYP, contribute generalizable evidence about children's health services and systems, and shape child health policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: New models of healthcare have largely focussed on adults, with increasing policy and practice interest in integrated care across many high-income countries. Integrated care models have been identified as a promising solution by children and young people (CYP), and by policymakers, to target the gaps in healthcare delivery for CYP with on-going conditions. However, there has been limited work on developing and evaluating integrated models of child healthcare, so there is an evidence gap in this important area of policy. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of integrated care interventions on child health, health service use, and healthcare quality for CYP with on-going conditions. Methods: Articles were eligible for the review if they 1) reported randomised controlled trials (RCTs), published between 1996 and September 2018; 2) evaluated an integrated healthcare intervention designed to improve child health; 3) included CYP (0-18 years) with an on-going health condition; 4) included at least one health-related outcome. Descriptive data on a range of outcomes was synthesised for all included papers, and data homogeneity allowed further metaanalyses to explore the effects of integrated care interventions compared with usual care, on health-related quality of life (QOL) and number of emergency department visits. Results: Twenty-three randomised controlled trials were identified, describing 18 interventions. Studies had medium risk of bias, as assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Improvements were found for quality of care (87% of interventions found a positive effect for intervention) and child health (39% found a positive effect for intervention). The meta-analyses found that integrated care interventions have a positive effect in improving QOL over usual care (n=5 trials; SMD = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.03, 0.44; P=0.02), but no significant difference across groups for emergency department contacts (n=5 trials; OR=0.82; 95% CI = 0.53, 1.26; p=0.37). Conclusion and Discussion: Integrated care interventions for CYP with on-going conditions may deliver improved quality of life for children, health, and quality of care. However, no conclusions can be made about the direction or magnitude of the effect for integrated care interventions on emergency department contacts in CYP with on-going conditions. However, only 23 RCTs were included in this review, which were of moderate quality, highlighting the need for more robust trials to inform current health service delivery in this area and fully establish the effectiveness of integrated healthcare interventions on CYP outcomes. In collaboration with NHS Trusts, local councils, CYP and families, the findings from this review have been used to inform a fully integrated healthcare model for CYP that will be implemented at scale, and rigorously evaluated using an RCT design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Children and young people's (CYP) health outcomes in England are variable and often poor. Health systems throughout high income countries are struggling to adapt to epidemiological transitions, social change, rising demand, and budget cuts. There was a 58% rise in CYP attending EDs between 2007 and 2016, projected to rise 50-60% more by 2030. CYP from the most deprived backgrounds are 60-70% more likely to go to A&E than the least deprived. The majority of ED attendances by CYP are manageable in primary care or integrated models, yet 85% of ED attendances are for minor illnesses, increasing 5% annually. The Children and Young People's Health Partnership (CYPHP) is a health system strengthening initiative implementing and evaluating a new model of care. Methods: Health system strengthening using the WHO building blocks model included service design by analysis of population need, systematic literature reviews, and extensive patient and public involvement. An evidence-based implementation plan was agreed for a child population of 90,000 in London, and we are evaluating using a cluster randomised control trial (cRCT) design with nested process evaluation and qualitative studies to assess CYP health and wellbeing, healthcare quality, patterns of healthcare use, and cost effectiveness. Results: CYPHP's comprehensive care includes health promotion and supported selfmanagement, proactive case-finding, biopsychosocial assessment and self-referral via a patient portal, with care delivered by a multidisciplinary team. Services are integrated vertically and horizontally incorporating physical and mental healthcare. Implementation has taken two years longer than anticipated due to technical and cultural challenges of health system strengthening. Early results indicate a reduction of 72 ED contacts per 100 children with asthma, 30 for children with epilepsy, and 15 for children with constipation. We estimate cost savings per 100 asthma patients to be over £15,000, for epilepsy over £6,000, and for constipation over £3,000. Of the first 200 patients, most were from socially deprived areas and 68% were from black and minority ethnic groups. Families report more confidence in managing their child's condition. Discussion: As a clinical academic partnership, CYPHP combines pragmatic quality improvement and rigorous health services research. CYPHP demonstrates that health system strengthening in high income countries is feasible and effective for implementing and testing new models of care to improve child health. Conclusions: Early results suggest encouraging impact on patterns of healthcare use and potential cost savings. CYPHP's population health approach provides care for those with greatest health and social need. Lessons learned: Rigorous health services and systems research is feasible in large scale system change in the NHS. Health system strengthening is a new concept in high income countries. It is slow and difficult, but important for effective implementation of new models of care. Fully integrated comprehensive models of care for children may improve health and healthcare outcomes. Limitations: Results are preliminary and reflect early implementation. Suggestions for future research: Rigorously designed health services research for ongoing largescale health systems changes are an important source of new knowledge. There are few examples of such opportunistic research, representing new avenues for opportunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Children with critical or chronic physical illness and their families report high levels of psychological distress alongside, or as a result of, demanding treatment protocols. Calls for accessible, evidence-based and cost-effective mental health care to be integrated in routine physical health care are not new, but the content, format and efficacy of these services are largely unknown. Our aim was to identify, synthesise and critically evaluate the evidence on integrated mental health care in paediatric hospitals, and provide a set of evidence-based recommendations for successful integration. Methods: Six electronic databases were systematically searched for English language studies involving children with medical illness aged 0-18 years. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported on a psychosocial screening, assessment and/or intervention provided within an existing paediatric hospital service. No restrictions were made on trial design. Data was extracted following eight implementation outcomes: acceptability (satisfaction with the service), adoption (service utilization), appropriateness (patients' perceived suitability of the service), feasibility (providers' perception of utility), fidelity (service is delivered as intended), cost (cost-effectiveness of service), penetration (embedding into practice), and sustainability (continuation of service within hospital system). Results: A total of 10 studies were identified as eligible for review. Of these, five studies described psychosocial care provided within specialty clinics (2 cardiology, 2 epilepsy, 1 dermatology), three studies reported on psychological screening practices in hospital wards (2 general wards, 1 oncology), and two studies evaluated delivery of a manualised psychological intervention for hospital inpatients (2 oncology). Psychological services provided in paediatric hospitals were most commonly identified as both acceptable and feasible. Utilization of services varied according to the overall engagement of medical practitioners and hospital staff. Data on overall efficacy, costeffectiveness, and service sustainability was under-reported across studies. Discussion & Conclusion: The importance of integrated psychological care as part of holistic paediatric care is well-established; yet as this review demonstrates, there is a striking lack of evidence on the efficacy of implementing these models for children with chronic illness and their families. Integration of mental health care into paediatric hospitals is significantly influenced by individual, organisational and system level factors. Integrated service implementation requires strong provider commitment and yet limited evidence on the markers of service efficacy is a significant barrier to widespread adoption. Our review provides a platform for establishing coordinated, collaborative mental health care for this highly vulnerable population of children and families. Lessons learned: Evidence-based, conceptually driven implementation frameworks are vital for integrating psychological care into paediatric health care. Clear, universally used measures of efficacy are required to improve service uptake and outcomes. Our findings provide vital guidance for systemic and organisational change. Limitations: Studies reporting on implementation, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of integrated mental health services within paediatric hospitals are scarce. Our review is limited by the inclusion of only English language, peer-reviewed articles. Suggestions for future research: Methodologically rigorous research, including longitudinal assessment of health outcomes and costs is needed to truly assess the impact of these services for children and their families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]