Search

Introduction: Collaboration was legislated in the delivery of integrated care in the early 2000s in the UK. This research explored how the reality of practice met the rhetoric of collaboration. Theory: The paper is situated against a theoretical framework of structure, agency, identity and empowerment. Collectively and contextually these concepts inform the proposed model of 'collaborative agency' to sustain integrated care. The paper brings sociological theory on structure and agency to the dilemma of collaboration. Methods: Participative action research was carried out in collaborative teams that aspired to achieve integrated care for children, young people and families between 2009 and 2013. It was a part time, PhD study in collaborative practice. Results: The research established that people needed to be able to be jointly aware of their context, to make joint decisions, and jointly act in order to deliver integrated services, and proposes a model of collaborative agency derived from practitioner's experiences and integrated action research and literature on agency. The model reflects the effects of a range of structures in shaping professional identity, empowerment, and agency in a dynamic. The author proposes that the collaborative agency model will support integrated care, although this is, as yet, an untested hypothesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Long-term neurological conditions are a major cause of disability in the UK and internationally. Their successful management, in order to enhance health and well-being, requires both sophisticated organisation across a number of health, social care and other service boundaries, and the real involvement of people with neurological conditions and members of their support networks. Policy development: This paper reports on part of the preliminary scoping phase of a study designed to evaluate the impact of the National Service Framework for long-term neurological conditions on integrated care. It describes current policies in England and reports on discussions with a range of people involved in the planning, provision or use of services, which took place during the scoping exercise. These interviews inform how policy affecting people with long-term neurological conditions has been received and implemented so far. Conclusion and discussion: Findings suggest that progress towards integrated service provision is patchy and slow. In the competing priorities within government policy, neurological conditions have tended to be marginalised, within healthcare policy generally and in initiatives to support people with long-term conditions in particular. The reasons for this are explored and will inform the next stages of the research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of health care policy on the development of integrated mental health services in England. Data sources: Drawing largely from a narrative review of the literature on adult mental health services published between January 1997 and February 2003 undertaken by the authors, we discuss three case studies of integrated care within primary care, secondary care and across the primary/secondary interface for people with serious mental illness. Conclusion: We suggest that while the central thrust of a raft of recent Government policies in England has been towards integration of different parts of the health care system, policy waterfalls and implementation failures, the adoption of ideas before they have been thoroughly tried and tested, a lack of clarity over roles and responsibilities and poor communication have led to an integration rhetoric/reality gap in practice. This has particular implications for people with serious mental health problems. Discussion: We conclude with suggestions for strategies that may facilitate more integrated working. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To explore the integration of health and social care in the UK through policy and clinical guidelines and to examine how partnership working and case management enables policy to be embedded into local practice. Context: The UK Department of Health policy document (White Paper 2006) Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: a new Direction for Community Services [1] focused on a new direction for the whole health and social care system. Description: The paper and subsequent action plans targeted the way services are provided, placing greater choice and control in the hands of people who use them. Health and Social Care services were tasked with becoming better integrated to meet the needs and wishes of individuals with chronic illness and long-term needs. The UK's National Service Frameworks and NICE guidelines are being implemented at local level to achieve management of chronic illness through effective case management and roles are being evaluated to show the effect of interventions [2]. The Government report Our NHS, Our Future [3] encourages a response to the , needs of local communities through integrating care to ensure that services are shaped around the user not the organisation. Discussion: We know that people with chronic illness are intensive users of services; that repeat admissions to hospital cause untold distress and that this vulnerable group is increasing as our population ages. We also know that inappropriate and increased use of services causes a financial burden in both primary and secondary care. Managed care through effective case management, if adopted flexibly, presents an opportunity to focus on reducing costs whilst appropriately managing the health needs of the target population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Between 2012 and 2032 it is estimated that the populations of 65-84 years old and those over 85 in the United Kingdom will increase by 39 and 106% respectively (Kings Fund 2013). Recent figures suggest that people over the age of 65 account for almost 51% of gross local authority spending on adult social care (Oliver et al 2014). Current projections indicate that a growing proportion of older people will, in the future, be living on their own and will require formal care (King's Fund 2014). While these demographic changes have significant implications for adult social care policy they also draw attention to the pressing need for sufficient and appropriate housing that enables older people to live independently (Atkinson et al 2014). Practice: Not surprisingly the provision of appropriate housing is a key element of UK government policy (Garwood 2015). Various models of housing with care have emerged in recent years with Extra Care Housing (ECH) offering the potential to combine housing and social care in the same setting. Indeed the integration of personal housing alongside individualised care means that Extra Care Housing is viewed by many to be 'a viable alternative to and possible replacement for residential care' (Beach 2015:7). Extra Care Housing, compared to other models of housing, has several characteristics: it is primarily for older people; accommodation is almost always self-contained; social care can be delivered flexibly, usually by staff based on the premises; support staff are available on the premises 24 hours a day; domestic care is available; communal facilities and services are available; meals are usually available and charged for when taken; it aims to be a home for life and finally, it offers security of tenure (Laing and Buisson 2010). Key findings: Drawing on results from the Adult Social Services in Environmental Settings (ASSET) project (https://assetproject.wordpress.com/) and initial findings from our longitudinal study of Extra Care Housing (both funded by the National Institute for Health Research, School for Social Care Research) this paper will consider what potential the integration of housing and care has for older people living in the UK. It will consider the different models of integrating social care within housing and the advantages, as well as some of the challenges therein. The implications of integrating housing and care will be considered from the perspective of those managing schemes as well as from care workers and older people themselves. Conclusion: Despite the potential of Extra Care Housing to provide integrated care for older people the current economic context of the UK threatens to undermine the model. Reduced public spending and increased targeting of social care on those people thought most in need could weaken the preventive aims of Extra Care Housing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]