Search

Objective: There is considerable uncertainty regarding the optimal use of rifampicin for the treatment of tuberculous (TB) meningitis. A pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation study of rifampicin concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during TB meningitis treatment was performed in this study. Methods: Parameters for rifampicin pharmacokinetics in CSF were estimated using individual-level rifampicin pharmacokinetic data, and the model was externally validated in three separate patient cohorts. Monte Carlo simulations of rifampicin serum and CSF concentrations were performed. The area under the rifampicin CSF concentration-versus-time curve during 24 h (AUC0–24) relative to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) served as the pharmacodynamic target. Results: Across all simulated patients on the first treatment day, 85% attained the target AUC0–24/MIC ratio of 30 under a weight-based dosing scheme approximating 10 mg/kg. At the rifampicin MIC of 0.5 mg/l, the probability of AUC0–24/MIC target attainment was 26%. With an intensified dosing strategy corresponding to 20 mg/kg, target attainment increased to 99%, including 93% with a MIC of 0.5 mg/l. Conclusions: Under standard dosing guidelines, few TB meningitis patients would be expected to attain therapeutic rifampicin exposures in CSF when the MIC is ≥0.5 mg/l. Either downward adjustment of the rifampicin MIC breakpoint in the context of TB meningitis, or intensified rifampicin dosing upwards of 20 mg/kg/day, would reflect the likelihood of pharmacodynamic target attainment in CSF. Keywords: Tuberculosis, Meningitis, Tuberculous meningitis, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics

Objectives: Pyrazinamide is a key drug in the first-line treatment regimen for tuberculosis, with a potent sterilizing effect. Although low pyrazinamide peak serum concentrations (Cmax) are associated with poor treatment outcomes, many resource-constrained settings do not have sufficient laboratory capacity to support therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The objective of this study was to determine whether a colorimetric test of urine can identify tuberculosis patients with adequate pyrazinamide exposures, as defined by serum Cmax above a target threshold. Methods: In the derivation study of healthy volunteers, three dose sizes of pyrazinamide were evaluated, and intensive pharmacokinetic blood sampling was performed over an 8-h period, with a timed urine void at 4 h post-dosing. Pyrazinamide in urine was isolated by spin column centrifugation with an exchange resin, followed by colorimetric analysis; the absorbance peak at 495 nm was measured. The urine assay was then evaluated in a study of 39 HIV/tuberculosis patients in Botswana enrolled in an intensive pharmacokinetic study. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to measure diagnostic accuracy. The guideline-recommended pyrazinamide serum Cmax target of 35 mg/l was evaluated in the primary analysis; this target was found to be predictive of favorable outcomes in a clinical study. Following this, a higher serum Cmax target of 58 mg/l was evaluated in the secondary analysis. Results: At the optimal cut-off identified in the derivation sample, the urine colorimetric assay was 97% sensitive and 50% specific to identify 35 of 39 HIV/tuberculosis patients with pharmacokinetic target attainment, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.60–0.97). Diagnostic accuracy was lower at the 58 mg/l serum Cmax target, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.48–0.84). Men were less likely than women to attain either serum pharmacokinetic target. Conclusions: The urine colorimetric assay was sensitive but not specific for the detection of adequate pyrazinamide pharmacokinetic exposures among HIV/tuberculosis patients in a high-burden setting. Keywords: Tuberculosis, Pyrazinamide, Pharmacokinetics, Human immunodeficiency virus, Point-of-care testing