Search

Purpose: In this study, we propose a novel laparoscopy-based renal denervation (RDN) system for treating patients with resistant hypertension. In this feasibility study, we investigated whether our proposed surgical instrument can ablate renal nerves from outside of the renal artery safely and effectively and can overcome the depth-related limitations of the previous catheter-based system with less damage to the arterial walls. Method: We designed a looped bipolar electrosurgical instrument to be used with laparoscopy-based RDN system. The tip of instrument wraps around the renal artery and delivers the radio-frequency (RF) energy. We evaluated the thermal distribution via simulation study on a numerical model designed using histological data and validated the results by the in vitro study. Finally, to show the effectiveness of this system, we compared the performance of our system with that of catheter-based RDN system through simulations. Results: Simulation results were within the 95% confidence intervals of the in vitro experimental results. The validated results demonstrated that the proposed laparoscopy-based RDN system produces an effective thermal distribution for the removal of renal sympathetic nerves without damaging the arterial wall and addresses the depth limitation of catheter-based RDN system. Conclusions: We developed a novel laparoscope-based electrosurgical RDN method for hypertension treatment. The feasibility of our system was confirmed through a simulation study as well as in vitro experiments. Our proposed method could be an effective treatment for resistant hypertension as well as central nervous system diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose:Biological modelling of thermoradiotherapy may further improve patient selection and treatment plan optimisation, but requires a model that describes the biological effect as a function of variables that affect treatment outcome (e.g. temperature, radiation dose). This study aimed to establish such a model and its parameters. Additionally, a clinical example was presented to illustrate the application. Methods:Cell survival assays were performed at various combinations of radiation dose (0–8 Gy), temperature (37–42 °C), time interval (0–4 h) and treatment sequence (radiotherapy before/after hyperthermia) for two cervical cancer cell lines (SiHa and HeLa). An extended linear-quadratic model was fitted to the data using maximum likelihood estimation. As an example application, a thermoradiotherapy plan (23 × 2 Gy + weekly hyperthermia) was compared with a radiotherapy-only plan (23 × 2 Gy) for a cervical cancer patient. The equivalent uniform radiation dose (EUD) in the tumour, including confidence intervals, was estimated using the SiHa parameters. Additionally, the difference in tumour control probability (TCP) was estimated. Results:Our model described the dependency of cell survival on dose, temperature and time interval well for both SiHa and HeLa data (R2=0.90 andR2=0.91, respectively), making it suitable for biological modelling. In the patient example, the thermoradiotherapy plan showed an increase in EUD of 9.8 Gy that was robust (95% CI: 7.7–14.3 Gy) against propagation of the uncertainty in radiobiological parameters. This corresponded to a 20% (95% CI: 15–29%) increase in TCP. Conclusions:This study presents a model that describes the cell survival as a function of radiation dose, temperature and time interval, which is essential for biological modelling of thermoradiotherapy treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Purpose:Currently, clinical decisions regarding thermoradiotherapy treatments are based on clinical experience. Quantification of the radiosensitising effect of hyperthermia allows comparison of different treatment strategies, and can support clinical decision-making regarding the optimal treatment. The software presented here enables biological evaluation of thermoradiotherapy plans through calculation of equivalent 3D dose distributions. Methods:Our in-house developed software (X-Term) uses an extended version of the linear-quadratic model to calculate equivalent radiation dose, i.e. the radiation dose yielding the same effect as the thermoradiotherapy treatment. Separate sets of model parameters can be assigned to each delineated structure, allowing tissue specific modelling of hyperthermic radiosensitisation. After calculation, the equivalent radiation dose can be evaluated according to conventional radiotherapy planning criteria. The procedure is illustrated using two realistic examples. First, for a previously irradiated patient, normal tissue dose for a radiotherapy and thermoradiotherapy plan (with equal predicted tumour control) is compared. Second, tumour control probability (TCP) is assessed for two (otherwise identical) thermoradiotherapy schedules with different time intervals between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Results:The examples demonstrate that our software can be used for individualised treatment decisions (first example) and treatment optimisation (second example) in thermoradiotherapy. In the first example, clinically acceptable doses to the bowel were exceeded for the conventional plan, and a substantial reduction of this excess was predicted for the thermoradiotherapy plan. In the second example, the thermoradiotherapy schedule with long time interval was shown to result in a substantially lower TCP. Conclusions:Using biological modelling, our software can facilitate the evaluation of thermoradiotherapy plans and support individualised treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]