Search

Introduction: CRS and HIPEC confer survival benefit in selected patients with peritoneal metatases (PM). Accurate preoperative assessment of disease burden and exclusion of distant metastases are crucial in selecting the appropriate patient. We evaluate the utility of PET-CT scans in comparison with CT and MRI scans in patients considered for CRS and HIPEC. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from patients who had been discussed for CRS and HIPEC between January 2011 and December 2015, at our institutional multidisciplinary tumour board. Patients who underwent PET-CT scan were included. Results of PET-CT were compared against traditional imaging. Patient and tumour factors were analysed to identify those who were most likely to benefit from PET imaging. Results: Four hundred and seven patients were considered for CRS and HIPEC. PET-CT was performed for 128(31.4%) patients: being the only imaging modality in 37 and used as an adjunct in 91. In the latter group, it was not beneficial in 58 patients as it provided no additional information (n = 33) or showed lesions of minimal FDG uptake (n = 25). In 33 patients, PET-CT provided definitive answers for indeterminate lesions seen on CT and MRI, confirmed the diagnosis of peritoneal disease in 10 patients (30.3%), identified extra-peritoneal disease and/or nodal metastases in 15 (45.5%) and excluded peritoneal disease in 8 (24.2%). The usefulness of PET-CT was predicted by tumour histology (p = .009), with non-mucinous tumours benefitting the most. Conclusion: Our results suggest that PET-CT can be used as an adjunct to CT and/or MRI scans, when lesions on the CT/MRI scans are indeterminate, and that it is most useful in patients with non-mucinous tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improve survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases. However, only some patients who are potentially eligible for the procedure are considered and referred to the appropriate surgical department. By studying the trends of patients being considered for CRS and HIPEC in our centre, we hope to better understand the demographics of our patient cohort and the attitudes of physicians involved towards CRS and HIPEC. Methods: Patients who were presented and discussed at our institution’s multidisciplinary tumour board (MDTB) for consideration of CRS and HIPEC, between 5 January 2011 and 16 December 2015, were identified from the institutional database and included in the study. Patient demographics and clinico-pathological data were retrospectively collected from electronic records and clinical charts. Results: A total of 407 patients were presented at the MDTB for consideration of CRS and HIPEC. Referrals were most commonly from oncology-related departments (65.8%, n = 268). This was followed by referrals from other hospitals (15.0%, n = 61), overseas self-referrals (12.0%, n = 49) and non-oncologic departments within the same institution (7.1%, n = 29). Referrals made by oncology-related departments and overseas self-referrals showed an increasing trend over the years. Of the patients discussed, 197 patients (48.4%) were recommended for CRS and HIPEC, and 134 (68.0%) successfully underwent the procedure. Conclusions: There is growing acceptance of CRS and HIPEC in patients and oncologic-related departments. However, consideration of this procedure as a treatment option remains low in non-oncologic departments. Dissemination of information and well-defined clinical recommendations may help physicians identify and select potentially eligible patients for consideration of CRS and HIPEC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is routinely used to treat selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, but can be associated with prolonged hospital stay, significant morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to assess whether patients undergoing gastrectomy as part of CRS/HIPEC were at increased risk of delayed feeding time and prolonged hospital stay. Methods: Two hundred and fourteen consecutive patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with CRS/HIPEC between 2001 and 2016 were stratified by whether CRS included gastrectomy (n = 19, 9%) and compared. Primary outcomes were time to full feeds and rate of serious morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grades III-V). Secondary outcomes were durations of ICU and hospital stays. Results: Of 214 patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC, those undergoing gastrectomy (19, 8.9%) had increased time to full feeds (8 vs. 5 days, p < 0.01), and duration of ICU (2 vs. 1 days, p < 0.01) and total hospital stays (16 vs. 14 days, p = 0.013). There was no significant increase in serious complications, although increased risk of pneumonia was noted (21% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.011). Undergoing gastrectomy was not independently prognostic in multivariable analysis including high peritoneal tumour load (PCI >12), multiple CRS procedures (number >2) and operation duration (>480 min) in which operative duration remained independently prognostic (p < 0.01). Conclusions: After surgery, early oral refeeding may be beneficial in the majority of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. However, patients found to have high peritoneal tumour load with extended surgery and those who underwent gastrectomy should be considered for early post-operative TPN due to the significant risk of delayed time to full feeds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been found to prolong survival in patients with peritoneal disease but is associated with significant morbidity. We evaluate the perioperative complications and the association with the chemotherapy agent used for HIPEC. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of CRS-HIPEC cases between April 2001 and February 2016 was performed. Patients were stratified by the chemotherapy used, and perioperative complications were compared. Results: Out of 214 CRS-HIPEC cases, 113 procedures used Mitomycin-C(MMC), 92 used cisplatin, 8 used oxaliplatin and the HIPEC regimen for one procedure was not recorded and excluded. 94 patients (44%) suffered low-grade complications (grade I-II), and 49 patients (23%) suffered high-grade complications (grade III-V). The frequency of low-grade complications for the cisplain, oxaliplatin and MMC groups were 49%, 50% and 40%, respectively, whereas that of high-grade complications were 24%, 50% and 20%, respectively. HIPEC with platinum agents was associated with a higher rate of acute renal impairment (ARI) compared to MMC (32% and 62% for cisplatin and oxaliplatin vs. 5.6% for MMC), whereas grade IV ARI requiring dialysis occurred only in the cisplatin group (5.6%). HIPEC with oxaliplatin was associated with higher rates of post-operative bleeding (25% vs. 1.1% and 0.88%). Rates of other complications did not differ significantly between the groups receiving different HIPEC regimens. Conclusions: The overall complication rates do not significantly differ after HIPEC with MMC and platinum based agents. Renal impairment tends to be more common and of greater severity when a platinum agent is used, whereas oxaliplatin is associated with significant post-operative bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study seeks to evaluate pre and post-operative CA-125 in patients undergoing complete cytoreduction surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and understand the time frame before values normalise allowing use as a surveillance tool to resume. Methods: A retrospective review was carried out of 94 patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC to compare pre-operative CA-125 values, measured within one week prior to surgery to post-operative readings within the first 30 d. Raised CA-125 was defined using as a value >35 U/ml. Results: Of 63 (67%) patients with normal pre-operative CA-125, 22 (35%) had raised post-operative CA-125, and consisted of patients with colorectal (n = 8), appendiceal (n = 6), ovarian (n = 4) or other (n = 4) cancers. The average peak CA-125 was 80 U/ml occurring on median 10th post-operative day (POD) (range 7-30). The median day of normalisation for patients with normal pre-operative and raised post-operative CA-125 was 57 (range 28-115). The median day of normalisation for patients with raised pre-operative CA-125 was POD 41 (range 1-114). Notably 10 patients had initial normalisation (median POD 1, range 1-6), followed by subsequent raised value (median POD 10, range 5-40) and re-normalisation (median POD 47, range 19-104). Discussion: For patients with raised pre-operative CA-125 an immediate post-operative CA-125 within 3 d may be useful to assess normalisation following surgery. Aside from immediate measurement CA-125 is misleading and should not be measured post-operatively within the first 3 months after surgery following which its use as a surveillance marker can resume. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Radiological imaging often underestimates the extent of low volume peritoneal disease. The benefit of laparoscopy in assessing peritoneal metastases from colorectal and gastric cancer is accepted, but is inconclusive for appendiceal malignancy. We report our experience of diagnostic (DL) and therapeutic laparoscopy (TL) in patients with appendiceal tumours to determine indications and role in assessment and management. Methods: A retrospective review of a National Peritoneal Malignancy Centre’s prospectively maintained database was performed. All patients with appendiceal neoplasms who underwent DL or TL between September 2011 and January 2016 were included. The indications and outcomes of the laparoscopy, complications and interval to laparotomy were evaluated. Results: Six hundred and eighty-five patients underwent surgery for appendiceal neoplasms during the study period, of which 73 (10.6%) underwent laparoscopy (50 DL, 23 TL). The main indications for DL were to clarify imaging and stage patients with high-risk histology. Indications for TL were an abnormal appendix without gross pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) or with low volume PMP, and concerns for fertility in the presence of PMP. DL resulted in 16 patients (32%) avoiding laparotomy because of extensive disease or no tumour found. Overall, 28 patients were assessed to have resectable disease and at laparotomy, 25/28 had complete cytoreduction with three patients unresectable. In the TL group, appendicectomy and peritoneal lavage was achieved in all four women with fertility concerns, allowing them to conceive thereafter. There were no complications. Conclusions: Patients with high-risk appendiceal neoplasm may benefit from DL, and potentially avoid unnecessary laparotomy. TL is useful in patients with low volume PMP and may aid fertility in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction:Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is increasingly being treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). We provide a review of a high-volume Asian institute's experience and survival outcomes with this procedure. Methods:Data were prospectively collected from 201 consecutive CRS and HIPEC procedures performed in a single institution between April 2001 and November 2015. Our primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality. Results:77% of patients were Chinese, 9% were Malay, 6% were Indian and 8% were other ethnicities. Primary tumours were colorectal (30%), ovarian (32%), appendiceal (20%), primary peritoneal (6.5%), mesothelioma (4.5%) and others (5%). The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 12, and 92% of patients achieved a completeness of cytoreduction score (CC) of 0. High-grade morbidity occurred in 25.8% of cases, and there were no 30-day mortalities. At 5-years, the OS was 55.1% and DFS was 20.3%. Factors associated with improved OS on multivariate analysis were PCI <15 (p < 0.001) and a CC 0 (p = 0.016). Conclusions:The combined treatment of CRS and HIPEC is beneficial and is associated with reasonable morbidity and mortality in Asian patients with PC from colorectal, ovarian, appendiceal, primary peritoneal and mesothelioma primaries. Complete cytoreduction and extent of disease are the most important prognostic factors for survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]