Search

Allergic inflammation in the upper airways represents a wide-spread health issue: Little is known about whether it increases sensitivity to airborne chemicals thereby challenging established exposure limits that neglect such differences in susceptibility. To investigate the role of pre-existing allergic inflammation, 19 subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and 18 control subjects with low risk of sensitization were exposed for 4h to ammonia in two concentrations (cross-over design): 2.5ppm (odor threshold) and 0-40ppm (occupational exposure limit: 20ppm TWA). Prior to the whole-body exposure, it was confirmed that subjects with SAR showed persistent inflammation outside the pollen season as indicated by increased exhaled nitric oxide and total immunoglobulin E in serum compared to controls. Despite concentration-dependent increases in chemosensory perceptions and acute symptoms, SAR status did not modulate subjective effects of exposure. Moreover, SAR status did not affect the investigated physiological endpoints of sensory irritation: While eye-blink recordings confirmed weak ocular irritation properties of ammonia at 0-40ppm, this effect was not enhanced in SAR subjects compared to controls. Irrespective of SAR status, exposure to 0-40ppm ammonia did not result in a cortisol stress response, objective nasal obstruction as measured with anterior active rhinomanometry, or an inflammatory response as indexed by substance P, tumor-necrosis-factor α, and high-mobility-group protein 1 in nasal lavage fluid. At least for the malodorous compound ammonia, these results do not support the hypothesis that SAR enhances chemosensory effects in response to local irritants. Before generalizing this finding, more compounds as well as sensitization to perennial allergens need to be investigated., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

The individually different effects of exposure to comparable levels of chemicals might be partly explained by dissimilar response sensitivity towards chemicals. Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) might be the clinical endpoint of this altered sensitivity. Concerning a subclinical range of chemical sensitivity, 'challenge studies' with people reporting chemical sensitivity are needed to improve the knowledge about such differences. The chemical and general environmental sensitivity questionnaire (CGES) is a standardized screening tool for the selection of this group. In the present study 24 healthy male volunteers, half of them classified as sMCS-subjects, were experimentally exposed to 2-butanone and ethyl benzene at different levels (TLV-level vs. odor threshold). The strength of self-reported sensory irritations (nasal and ocular) and symptoms of bad smell were assessed, prior, during, and after the 4 hours of exposure. The time courses of sensory irritations were affected by sMCS. Across all exposure periods sMCS-subjects showed increasing symptom scores while control-subjects did not. Symptoms of bad smell were affected by three exposure-related factors (substance, level, duration) without any additional influence from the sMCS factor. Starting from these results it could be concluded that the time-depending influence of reported chemical sensitivity is most prominent for subjective data of sensory irritations.

The study examined the assumption of a higher sensitivity of autonomic functions of subjects with self-reported multiple chemical sensitivity (sMCS) during environmental exposure. The hypothesis was tested in a laboratory study with standardized exposures. Twelve healthy male subjects (26.4 +/- 5.4 y) with and 12 male control subjects (25.7 +/- 3.8 y) without self-reported multiple chemical sensitivity (sMCS), selected by a questionnaire, were included in the experimental study. At four different days the subjects were exposed in a random order to solvents for four hours: 10 ppm or 98 ppm ethyl benzene, 10 ppm or 189 ppm 2-butanone. Heart rate and breathing rate were analysed for two 30-minutes periods of vigilance testing at the beginning and end of exposure. In sMCS-subjects both functions were elevated at the beginning of the testing periods with a tendency to decrease over the 30-minutes periods. Control subjects revealed a relatively constant level (breathing rate) and a small increase (heart rate) during the periods. These group differences were obvious for all experimental conditions across substances and levels of exposures. Furthermore, the mean of the breathing rate of sMCS-subjects was generally higher compared to the control subjects. While the assumption of a generally altered sensitivity of autonomic functions of sMCS-subjects to environmental changes seems to be supported, no specific reactions to the type or level of the chemical exposure were found.