Search

The decarbonization of hydrocarbons is explored in this work as a method to produce hydrogen and mitigate carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. An integrated process for power generation and carbon capture based on a hydrocarbon fueled-decarbonization unit was proposed and simulated. Ethane and propane were used as fuels and subjected to the thermal decomposition (decarbonization) process. The system is also composed of a carbon fuel cell (CFC) and hydrogen fuel cell (HFC) for the production of power and a pure CO2 stream that is ready for sequestration. The HFC is a high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell operating at 200 °C. Simulations were performed using ASPEN HYSYS V.10 for the entire process including the CFC and HFC being operated at various operating temperatures (200–800 °C). The power output from the CFC and the HFC as well as the overall process efficiency were calculated. The model incorporates an energy recovery system by adopting a counter-current shell and tube heat exchangers and a turbine. The water produced from the fuel cell system can be utilized in the plant to recover the heat from the furnace. The results showed a 100% carbon capture with a nominal plant capacity of 108 MWe produced when propane fuel was fed to the decarbonizer. The CFC theoretical efficiency is 100% and the practical efficiency was taken as 70% when all internal polarizations were considered. The results showed that, in the case of propane, the CFC power output was 89 MWe when the CFC operated at 650 °C, and the HFC power output was around 45 MWe at 200 °C with an overall actual plant efficiency of 35% and 100% carbon capture. Sensitivity analysis recommends a hydrocarbon fuel cost of 0.011 $/kW as the most feasible option. The results reported here on the decarbonization of hydrocarbon fuels are promising toward the direct production of hydrogen with full carbon dioxide sequestration at a potentially lower cost especially in rural areas. The overall actual efficiencies are very competitive to those of conventional power plants operated without carbon capture.

Paper and pulp mills generate substantial quantities of cellulose-rich sludge materials that are disposed in landfills at a large scale. For sustainability purposes, sludge materials can be bioprocessed to produce renewable fuels and useful chemicals. The enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose is the process bottleneck that affects the conversion economics directly by using zero-cost raw materials. In order to study and optimize the process, the characteristics of the sludge raw materials should be first evaluated. In this work, sludge samples were obtained from paper mills located at different locations in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Part of the sludge samples was washed (de-ashed) with hydrochloric acid while the other part remained unwashed. The samples were subjected to multiple spectroscopic analyses techniques to evaluate the morphological properties of cellulose fibers and to estimate the total structural carbohydrate content. The results showed that the de-ashing process changed some fiber characteristics and cellulose crystallinity structure in all sludge samples. Sludge sample A (obtained from Kraft pulp and recycled paper mill region) showed a high percentage of fiber, with crystalline cellulose, compared to the other two sludge samples suggesting that sludge A is a valuable source to make value-added products. Aspen Plus mass and energy calculations performed in view of the ‘zero’ cost and the reliable supply of sludge raw materials producing 2 mol H2/mol glucose. Moreover, the results showed that extracting crystalline cellulose from these sludge samples is more profitable than crystalline cellulose made from the other lignocellulosic feedstocks. The results reported here showed that the utilization of these sludge materials would be an economically attractive and promising alternative for the production of hydrogen.

Composite membranes composed of zirconium phosphate (ZrP) and imidazolium-based ionic liquids (IL), supported on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) were prepared and evaluated for their application in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEM) operating at 200 °C. The experimental results reported here demonstrate that the synthesized membrane has a high proton conductivity of 0.07 S cm−1, i.e, 70% of that reported for Nafion. Furthermore, the composite membranes possess a very high proton conductivity of 0.06 S cm−1 when processed at 200 °C under completely anhydrous conditions. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images indicate the formation of very small particles, with diameters in the range of 100–300 nm, within the confined pores of PTFE. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) reveals a maximum of 20% weight loss up to 500 °C for the synthesized membrane. The increase in proton conductivity is attributed to the creation of multiple proton conducting paths within the membrane matrix. The IL component is acting as a proton bridge. Therefore, these membranes have potential for use in PEM fuel cells operating at temperatures around 200 °C.

The present study investigates the technical possibilities of hydrogen and methane production from palm oil mill effluent (POME). The production was carried out in two stage (thermophilic and mesophilic) continuous phase with recirculation of the digestate sludge. The reactors used for the present study, up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB) and continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) were operated under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions, respectively. The UASB reactor was operated at 2 days hydraulic retention time (HRT) and 75 kgCOD m3 d−1 organic loading rate (OLR) for hydrogen production. The effluents from UASB reactor containing mainly with acetate and butyrate were directly fed into CSTR for methane production and 5 days HRT was maintained. Both UASB and CSTR reactors were operated for 120 days continuously, and a stable production of the hydrogen and methane was obtained in the separate reactors. The maximum hydrogen and methane production rate achieved was 1.92 L H2 L−d−1 and 3.2 L CH4 L−1 d−1, respectively. The cumulative hydrogen and methane yields were 215 L H2/kgCOD−1 and 320 L CH4/kgCOD−1, respectively with the total COD removal efficiency of 94%. Thermoanaerobacterium species was dominant in hydrogen reactor, while methane reactor was dominated with Methanobrevibacter sp.