Search

Much research concerning drug use in the context of sexual activity among gay and bisexual men derives from public health scholarship. In this paper, we critically examine how the relationship between methamphetamine use and sexual risk practice is treated and understood in this body of research. While public health has made important contributions to establishing the link between methamphetamine use and sexual risk-taking, the precise nature of the relationship is not well defined. This creates space for ungrounded assumptions about methamphetamine use to take hold. We outline what appear to be two dominant interpretations of the methamphetamine/sexual practice relationship: the first proposes that methamphetamine has specific pharmacological properties which lead to sexual disinhibition, risky behaviour and poor health outcomes; the second proposes that methamphetamine attracts men who are already inclined toward highly sexualised interactions and risky practice, and that such men are likely to engage in these practices with or without drugs. We suggest that both interpretations are problematic in that they individualise and cast drug and sex practices as inherently risky and biopsychologically determined. We outline a more historically, socially and politically engaged way to understand methamphetamine use in the context of sexual activity by drawing on the concept of sex-based sociality and the ways in which gay and bisexual men may use methamphetamine and sex as social resources around which to build identities, establish relationships, participate in gay communities, and maximise pleasure while protecting themselves and others from harm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: In Australia, sterile needles are distributed to people who inject drugs through formal services for the purposes of limiting the transmission of blood borne viruses (BBV). Secondary exchange (SE) involves people acquiring needles from formal services and redistributing them to others. This paper describes the extent, patterns and contexts of SE in south east Sydney, Australia and examines whether SE is independently associated with BBV risk practices. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a cross-sectional study using surveys and in-depth interviews. Respondents were people using community-based pharmacies to obtain sterile needles and syringes. Results: Data were collected from 229 survey respondents, over half of whom (54%) reported SE in the previous month. Of these, 40% engaged in distribution only, 25% in receipt only and 36% in both. Respondents reported passing on 21.7% of their needles to others in the last month, most commonly to friends (51.6%) and partners (27.4%). Recipients of SE were four times more likely than non-secondary exchangers to report borrowing used syringes in the last month. Respondents reported supplying sterile equipment to others to prevent reuse and to reduce risks associated with unplanned drug use. Conclusion: SE is a common activity in south east Sydney but does not appear to be highly organised, usually taking place in small networks of friends and/or partners for altruistic reasons. Harm reduction programs could capitalise on the prevalence of SE to reach injecting drug users who do not use formal distribution services. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This paper explores the perceptions of 35 key informants (KIs) in a range of relevant health and community sectors regarding the stigmatisation of GBM's crystal methamphetamine use and sexual practice with view to informing stigma reduction efforts. A modified social ecological model was used to guide analysis and interpretation. At the individual level, KI participants indicated that crystal methamphetamine was used by some GBM to reduce the effects of internalised stigma. At the network level, KIs thought that some drugs and types of use could attract more stigma and that this could erode support from GBM networks for men who use crystal. KIs felt that few "mainstream" organisations could provide appropriate services for GBM who use crystal and furthermore, that there was significant work to "undo" misperceptions of the harms of crystal use. At the policy level, mass media anti-drug campaigns were seen to be a significant generator of stigma with irrelevant and patronising messages that lacked useful information. Efforts to reduce stigma about crystal methamphetamine use amongst GBM must address individual, network, organisation and policy issues and be underpinned by understandings of social power in relation to sex, sexuality, drug use, infectious status and sexual minorities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Internalised stigma experienced by people who inject drugs (PWID) is known to have negative health consequences. Research has explored factors that may protect or buffer individuals from the negative consequences of internalised stigma. Community attachment, or perceived connection to a community of like people, can have numerous health-related benefits. However, this relationship may be complex for PWID; being part of a social network of PWID may provide opportunity for more frequent drug use and equipment sharing. This study investigated the relationships between community attachment, internalised stigma, and wellbeing among PWID, while also addressing potential health risks associated with PWID community attachment.Methods: PWID (n=603) were recruited through nine peer-based drug user organisations across Australia with assistance from the peak consumer organisation. Participants completed a survey measuring community attachment, internalised stigma, personal wellbeing, injecting frequency, and equipment sharing.Results: Greater attachment to a PWID community was associated with lower internalised stigma, but also with sharing of injecting equipment and increased frequency of injecting behaviour. The relationship between community attachment and personal wellbeing was mediated by internalised stigma, however this was only the case for PWID who reported no sharing of injecting equipment.Conclusions: This research highlights the significance of community attachment for PWID while also noting the complexity of this relationship and the potential negative consequences. It is important to view networks of PWID communities as sources of positive social capital, where norms about health behaviours and harm reduction can be promoted and which can buffer community members from the harms associated with stigma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]